We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceres Power Holdings Plc | CWR | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.30 | -1.28% | 100.20 | 16:35:19 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102.20 | 99.40 | 102.80 | 100.20 | 101.50 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC & ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 04/6/2025 11:32 by pills1 Share price possibly moving to whatever price Bosch have agreed to sell.Plus, I suspect there’s an internal buyer within cwr contract base for Bosch stock. Doosan gets more exciting each time I read on the subject-the possibilities are huge and extremely likely to come off!THIS TIME! |
Posted at 03/6/2025 09:00 by pills1 Weird movement on prices today! Not just Cwr either! |
Posted at 07/4/2025 11:59 by scrutable It is a quirk of accounting practice to pretend that licence fees are not income. Most profitable companies, by normal reckoning, would give their eye teeth for the cash flow that CWR keeps on generating. The company spends increasing amounts of that cash building more IP and this appears to be just high expenditure. The company shares are ridiculously underpriced if one considers the sharp acceleration in asset growth from increasing intangibles. |
Posted at 03/4/2025 07:33 by book5 IMHO Only power plants operating with natural gas and SOFC and capturing the carbon can save CWRThese plants would have costs comparable to traditional gas-turbine power stations with carbon capture. However, carbon capture has yet to be widely adopted—and it may never be, as it requires massive subsidies. |
Posted at 11/3/2025 12:25 by book5 As AI saidOS-Fuel cells are not financially viable at current prices except in carbon capture projects and are not taking off at an industrial scale yet. Our customers want cheaper technologies, and SOFC is not the winner in most sectors. There is no future until SOFC power stations are cheaper than conventional ones. A ray of hope is power stations combined with carbon capture. We need government support for decades to lower manufacturing costs by 90% and subsidise industries' steel and ammonia heat integration. Shipping: It is unclear if a higher temperature range is better, so we may not win the race there. Technology must bring economic advantages to succeed quickly. CWR does not do that. It increases the costs of conventional power stations by 700%. So, this is highly speculative, and the market does not believe in it. Potential customers are not buying enough power cells, and the market is too thin. There is a worldwide tiny market for stand-backup electricity systems that our Taiwanese partners are targeting. We need Ed Miliband's carbon capture project to utilise CWR power cells. He will need several billion to buy SOFCs. |
Posted at 25/2/2025 15:47 by mr macgregor You didn’t have to be an insider. The writing was on the wall before the Bosch announcement. I wrote the following before the announcement. I’m not an insider.Mr MacGregor - 19 Feb 2025 - 13:24:46 - 3398 of 3552 Ceres Power Holdings PLC Distributed Generation - CWR The Bosch 200MW factory was supposed to get built at the same time as the Doosan 50MW factory but CWR have been rowing back on their Bosch hype for several years now. I would stop development spend on the fuel cell arm and let manufacturers carry all the risk under license if they want to. I would concentrate 100% on the electrolyser development. It’s a shame they didn’t work it that way around in the first place. |
Posted at 21/2/2025 10:38 by bmel Mr MacGregorBosch does (did) not have a SOEC license. From yesterday's RNS: " Bosch will discontinue its operations relating to the industrialisation and preparation for the production of decentralised power-supply systems based on solid oxide fuel cells." The current electrolyser licences are: Delta SOEC and SOFC Denso SOEC only Thermax SOEC only Taking a step back, we might consider the root cause of the cancellation event. Bosch has made a significant new product development mistake. This is a strategic error that has/will cost Bosch a great deal of money, but new products fail every day for a whole range of reasons. In this case, Bosch, like a great many other companies in emerging green technologies, probably planned for a much faster rate of customer adoption of their Ceres-powered remote power generator units. Customer adoption rates of new green products have been massively slower than 'everyone' thought they would be - ask any electrolyser manufacturer. This includes the German one that announced last week that it is laying off 120 people and halting the building of its new factory. Or NEL, which has cancelled plans for new PEM production capacity; PLUG, which is now drowning in an ocean of debt; or Fortesque, which has cancelled a new plant in Australia. The massive hype about multi-billion projects worldwide has not happened, and only recently are real projects starting to get FIDs. Later, smaller and much more slowly than markets imagined would be the case when CWR was £13 and ITM was £5. Bosch has spent a lot of money and will sack a lot of people costing much more money, and that will be the end of it for them. A new product development mistake was made, they recognise it as a sunk cost, write it off and move on. CWR will not get a royalty stream in future years, but they have been paid for everything already supplied and have developed intellectual property with Bosch on larger-scale manufacturing processes that they can use with other partners. They do not have an empty factory to fill, employees to sack, or a big pile of stock/WIP for their Bosch customer to write off. Ceres will move on. As an ITM shareholder I do not wish Bosch well in their electrolyser venture. However, I can say from ITM's experience - it is a lot harder than it looks - and they had 20 years of experience in PEM technology to build on. |
Posted at 19/2/2025 22:38 by book5 What is it’s technical advantage? There is spin from part of the companyI heard that Cwr SOEC’s efficiency is better only when CWR uses superheated water steam produced as a by-product of other industrial processes. The problem is that superheated steam is already used in different processes through heat exchanges. So, SOEC must compete with the current industrial processes of superheated steam and requires heavy investment to redesign industrial processes. All very complex and at early stages Good thing is we have 5 partners in Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan and India. News could come any time. |
Posted at 14/2/2025 18:41 by bmel PART 2Our directors know all this stuff and can wait out the 'hydrogen/green is a lot of sh*t' media. Trump might make that run in the USA. However, CWR are not active in the USA. Asia/Europe are running in the opposite direction and that is where CWR licences are. Our shorter is in a difficult position, smart money recognises that and will wait them out as they hope to turn a rising tide of positive announcements by Cwr and other players in the H2 market. |
Posted at 25/11/2024 22:24 by moontheloon London South EastJoin our Investor Webinar on the 3rd December 18:00-19:30, with speakers from Sunda Energy and Blencowe Resources. Please register here. Share PricesCeres Power Share PriceCeres Power Share ChatPin to quick picksCeres Power Share Chat (CWR)CWR Share PriceCWR SharePriceCWR Share NewsCWR ShareNewsCWR Share ChatCWR ShareChat4CWR Share TradesCWR ShareTrades790CWR Live RNSCWRLive RNSSponsored ContentCeres Power Information Buy CWR SharesBuy CWR SharesAdd CWR to WatchlistAdd CWR to WatchlistAdd CWR to AlertAdd CWR to AlertCWR Live PriceLast checked at 22:19:55×Share Price Information for Ceres Power (CWR)London Stock Exchange Share Price is delayed by 15 minutesGet Live DataShare Price:166.60Bid:167. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
