ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

BUR Burford Capital Limited

1,226.00
13.00 (1.07%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Burford Capital Limited LSE:BUR London Ordinary Share GG00BMGYLN96 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  13.00 1.07% 1,226.00 1,226.00 1,228.00 1,235.00 1,201.00 1,201.00 98,278 16:35:12
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt 1.39B 610.52M 2.7883 4.40 2.69B
Burford Capital Limited is listed in the Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BUR. The last closing price for Burford Capital was 1,213p. Over the last year, Burford Capital shares have traded in a share price range of 900.00p to 1,387.00p.

Burford Capital currently has 218,957,218 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Burford Capital is £2.69 billion. Burford Capital has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 4.40.

Burford Capital Share Discussion Threads

Showing 14876 to 14896 of 26050 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  598  597  596  595  594  593  592  591  590  589  588  587  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
10/12/2019
20:05
Devalpha IC is an FT publication.
stentorian
10/12/2019
19:59
You make some good points stockvalue.I would go further....the musings, predictions and opinions of all analysts and financial journalists should simply be ignored.They don't mean anything. All that matters in the long run is factual business performance. That's what will determine the correct share price given time.Factual reporting on business performance is too hard for most financial journalists.The sensational story is easy, and doesn't require much research. Share price currently going up....great business....going down...dog.....MW short.....must be a dog.The IC in particular was a great supporter of Burford until the MW short, then they reversed course overnight.Why?The share price went down... the calibre of their analysis was basically that if the price crashes it must be a dog respite it being an ardent supporter previously.It's all nonsense.Look at the available facts and form your own opinion whatever that may be.Ignore everything else.Good luck to all long term holders and anyone with a genuine interest.What's really
devalpha
10/12/2019
18:02
GRS - really it just boiled down to an observation that sometimes papers can't publish all they know.
You're entirely entitled to think otherwise.

trident5
10/12/2019
17:43
trident5 seems to be good at making statements he can’t back up with any evidence or fact! Have you thought about becoming a politician trident?
gettingrichslow
10/12/2019
17:29
I'm glad most 2 year olds don't speak like Chimers
bristol97
10/12/2019
17:13
@trident5 I knew you could not give a real world example, that's why i asked.
stockvalue
10/12/2019
16:57
I can't remember the detail now Stockvalue, but just recall a journalist at the Sunday Times, I think, making it clear that sometimes readers need to read between the lines of some stories especially when papers revisit certain subjects.
trident5
10/12/2019
16:53
@trident5 Could you please provide just one real world example for your Thesis?
stockvalue
10/12/2019
16:46
Winsome - my point was that sometimes the press bangs on about something because they know more than they can print.
trident5
10/12/2019
16:46
Onup- chimers whatever you view why is your language like 2 year olds ?
onup
10/12/2019
16:44
MM trash the price to let someone pick up 200000 shares at 7-44 crooks
borg45
10/12/2019
16:41
trident - poor comparison. I'm no genius at investing but from day one of the woodford empire I always thought he'd never beat the market with the billions he had to allocate and that he would have to start speculating to generate higher returns from what was otherwise a proxy tracker fund. Turned out to be a real basket case from many directions.
winsome
10/12/2019
16:36
Winsome - the FT reported a lot on Woodford too, and looked what happened there.
trident5
10/12/2019
16:32
Oh and by the by ...the FT has a phone number...HELL YEAH so was I!!!

So it seems even a "person" can "phone" them.

Whatever next...

chimers
10/12/2019
16:27
Seems for a while now that the FT have been working against BUR with someone else with a grudge or a short position. Hardly neutral, are they? And the most recent article about Petersen was a comprehensive mud fling at the Petersen case, as if written by a 3rd party and provided to the journalist. Then MW move in for the kill. It ignores a lot of the actual facts recently stated by Bogart.

I'd like the FT to confirm where they get all their stuff (stuff being the right word).

winsome
10/12/2019
16:27
Related party transaction?
trident5
10/12/2019
16:26
But with the two sources of equity being under common management?
And not seen as being worthy of disclosure?
If true, this would add to the concerns over governance.
Add seriously to those concerns.

galatea99
10/12/2019
16:26
I would have thought that an "own fund" would be a related party under the terms of IFRS - and therefore such a sale should have been disclosed as a related party disclosure, had it occurred?
kirkie001
10/12/2019
16:17
Own fund means different equity - so still a third party sale
williamcooper104
10/12/2019
16:10
How does the buy out actually work if the offer is lower than the price you bought are you forced to sell ?
borg45
10/12/2019
16:03
‘... even if they have, I can’t see it being a major issue’

You jest - surely?

monte1
Chat Pages: Latest  598  597  596  595  594  593  592  591  590  589  588  587  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock