We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Berkeley Energia Limited | LSE:BKY | London | Ordinary Share | AU000000BKY0 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.20 | -0.97% | 20.40 | 20.00 | 20.80 | 20.60 | 20.40 | 20.60 | 77,500 | 11:54:55 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 0 | -1.37M | -0.0031 | -129.03 | 178.32M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/3/2016 16:32 | "Likely, it depends on what you wrote in the (e)mail" Straightforward question from a potential shareholder. Nothing sensitive. Polite. Good punctuation. Spelling up to scratch. Not even an acknowledgement and a brush off. Not impressed. Have you tried? | bookvan | |
01/3/2016 16:11 | Anyone any thoughts on the EDF Union position at Hinckley c could it mean a reduction in demand for the product? Or alternatively if the French don't do it will someone else step in? | fatboy20 | |
01/3/2016 15:56 | apols, double click | rhuvaal2 | |
01/3/2016 15:56 | Likely, it depends on what you wrote in the (e)mail | rhuvaal2 | |
01/3/2016 12:27 | If he is so keen to talk to shareholders could you ask him why I have tried mailing the company and not had a response? Have posters on this board tried and had better luck or is my experience normal? | bookvan | |
01/3/2016 09:13 | Paul Atherley is going to be up in Manchester at the Shares evening next week on 10th March. A very approachable guy and keen to spread the message and talk to shareholders. Also there will be C4X Discovery (C4XD) and eg solutions (EGS). Link here www.sharesmagazine.c | tradervic | |
01/3/2016 08:41 | I read somewhere about an institution buying on the open market. I can't think why it should rather than take a placing and I can't think where I read it. It might not even be this share. Does it ring a bell with you? | bookvan | |
29/2/2016 14:48 | Hi Brookvan The first one at 23.139p was subsequently cancelled and reissued at 23.15p which is why it's showing twice. Still, on its own, it's a very sizeable investment. We know there are institutional investors increasing their stake here and this is more evidence. I have more funds available soon which I will park here and in my usual style, I will post here when I've bought | 1628386 | |
29/2/2016 12:57 | Google finance is now showing 2 trades of 5 million each, one at 9.36 and the second at 12.34. That's as much as several months normal volume in 3 hours. Has any reader the slightest idea what's going on? I thought I read somewhere that an institution had said it was going to buy on the open market but can't find the reference. | bookvan | |
29/2/2016 10:29 | Very large trade this morning. Isn't there supposed to be some large investor who stated their intention to buy on the open market or is memory playing tricks? | bookvan | |
25/2/2016 10:45 | Herlat1 Spot on. QP is stifling debate here and it's a great shame. QP... If there is a purpose (against the company), why not set your own thread up, so that people who feel the same will join and discuss with you? I think everyone seems agreed that we don't want to engage with you | 1628386 | |
25/2/2016 09:49 | QP Having your relentlessly negative views questioned doesn't make the responders rampers. You are not a shareholder and far from being a potential future investor it is increasingly clear from GWR7's posts you have form as a bit of a pest elsewhere.Is there any particular reason why this Company irks you so much?It is not clear to me that they are doing anything wrong. Am i missing something? | herlat1 | |
25/2/2016 09:14 | You are certifiable. No wonder your posts are REMOVED on other threads. QP | quepassa | |
25/2/2016 08:52 | I gave you fair warning. | gwr7 | |
25/2/2016 08:21 | The inability and hostility of the rampers to discuss and tolerate the tough questions being asked in an open and polite forum is of course counter-productive. Anyone reading this increasingly nasty thread is most likely to be put off immediately. And that is, of course, wholly counter-productive for them and not very good at all for their ramping campaign. ALL IMO. DYOR. QP | quepassa | |
25/2/2016 07:49 | GWR7 Please don't feed the trolls | piedro | |
25/2/2016 07:46 | Just insane. QP | quepassa | |
25/2/2016 07:10 | 1628386 - agreed. | snowyflake | |
24/2/2016 19:07 | QP I agree with GWR7. You have been ruining this board for ages. I probably would have shared a lot more of my research here if it wasn't for your nonsense. | 1628386 | |
24/2/2016 16:41 | Deluded. Off his trolley. QP | quepassa |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions