We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aviva Plc | LSE:AV. | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BPQY8M80 | ORD 32 17/19P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.70 | 0.35% | 490.30 | 490.30 | 490.50 | 491.30 | 487.60 | 489.40 | 5,777,679 | 16:35:03 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance Carriers, Nec | 41.43B | 1.09B | 0.3962 | 12.38 | 13.43B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
09/4/2018 08:29 | Cannot read that link. Any clue as to what it says? | edmundshaw | |
08/4/2018 20:58 | Just came across this. Decent summary if anyone is interested. hxxps://wordpress.co | morph7 | |
05/4/2018 16:06 | Ops thanks | jaycee10 | |
05/4/2018 16:01 | Hi is the drop in price today related to the preference share issue? | jaycee10 | |
05/4/2018 13:33 | Effectively up 5.5p today | villarich | |
05/4/2018 12:46 | So it should. Aviva worth much more than this. | adelwire2 | |
05/4/2018 12:38 | Holding up well | mj19 | |
03/4/2018 09:13 | xd on 5th April 19p | a0148009 | |
29/3/2018 17:09 | Aviva are mentioned in our recent blog post here: | sharesoc | |
29/3/2018 00:29 | I think I saw somewhere that the number of prefs sold in the 2 weeks between 8 March and the 23 March announcement was something like 10 million. Total value lost by vendors would therefore be around £3m-£4m. Almost a rounding difference for a company making £3bn. The smart move would have been to get ahead of the game and immediately announce a compensation plan. As it is the reputational damage continues and will probably get worse as the complaints just seem to be mounting. Plenty of letters going into the FCA and Treasury Committee from what I have seen on other bulletin boards. Seems there was a pref share cancellation idea that was being touted around the City by an investment bank, a bit like the sort of dodgy tax planning that used to be fashionable. Not sure if this is linked with what Aviva did - but people are asking the question. Management are fast losing control of the narrative. | coleridge4 | |
28/3/2018 17:23 | Mmmmmmmmm, always a good idea to 'sue' the company you have 'invested' in. Then watch your share value sink due to the disruption! | bothdavis | |
28/3/2018 08:42 | It would be ironic(and quite reasonable IMHO) if Aviva ended up having to compensate all the holders that directly lost out through their outrageous actions. It would also be nice to see Slaughter and May sent packing with a flea in their ear, though that might be too much to ask.... | cwa1 | |
27/3/2018 17:26 | edmundshaw, you wily old sod, I'm mildly jealous of your preference share punt now :-) | cordwainer | |
27/3/2018 12:18 | So who here is pressuring the directors to refund those holders that panicked, sold and lost money?This was a case of taking value from a minority group of shareholders and passing to the majority shareholders. | muffster | |
27/3/2018 11:59 | I think it shows a level of arrogance on the part of the board. Assuming everyone would just roll over and accept it. To admit the mistake so quickly proves it was flawed from the start. Very poor. | villarich | |
27/3/2018 08:39 | Slaughter(how appropriate) and May seem to have been the guilty legal party-BUT they only gave the advice-as Edmund says it is the board's decision whether to go with it or not. IMHO they made a "Ratners" style decision, that could easily come back to haunt them, without putting enough thought or due diligence in to the consequences of their actions. | cwa1 | |
27/3/2018 08:27 | Legal counsel did what they were paid to do, work out the legalities of the plan. But the FD and CEO should have bonked the idea on the head at once, they have the wider picture, should have seen the consequences - FFS even I could see it was a bad idea after an initial enthusiasm, once I looksed at one of the prospectuses. CEO might have some very feeble excuse as his is perhaps not a legal detail role; I don't see any for the FD, he just didn't do his job. | edmundshaw | |
27/3/2018 07:25 | Not only stupid but also why they’re in the role in the first place If they couldn’t see the downsides then clearly they’re in the wrong job | joe say | |
27/3/2018 07:18 | You just have to ask how they could be so stupid - and I mean stupid. | lord gnome | |
23/3/2018 13:55 | I sold AV. and bought LGEN with the money. Similar yield, P/E much better. On the other hand, I invested similar amounts on similar 'market-annuity' terms 20 years ago in Aviva and Prudential - and the Aviva investment is paying no less than 40% more.... | dennis russell |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions