We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aukett Swanke Group Plc | LSE:AUK | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000617950 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.70 | 1.60 | 1.80 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 416,162 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architectural Services | 8.71M | -2.28M | -0.0138 | -1.23 | 2.81M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/10/2004 08:29 | I'm still holding, share price and news can't get any worse, as long as the 2.5 support is holding, so will I. | tiraider | |
27/10/2004 08:19 | Very tight spread at the moment for this illiquid stock. Bid 2.778 Offer 2.82 | darkinbad | |
13/10/2004 07:11 | Does anyone know why Steven Beckers, MD European Ops got the boot last month? | darkinbad | |
12/10/2004 12:14 | At current levels i'd say yes i would get more at this price if funds were available, just hoping they will go back to 6p again soon which was my entry point a few years ago gd | distill | |
12/10/2004 11:50 | I have just bought in 105k. Hope I have made the right decision | seanspooner | |
11/10/2004 16:06 | Is ADVFN correct with the no. of shares in issue, 72M? With a market cap of 1.8M and T/O of around 13M these look cheap if they could actually deliver a profit or am I missing something. | darkinbad | |
08/7/2004 08:14 | Post removed by ADVFN | shirishg | |
08/7/2004 08:09 | so someone must know somethink or are these just drifting with the tide gd | distill | |
27/6/2004 14:51 | Just reviewed their results, there seems to be some tidying up excerise happening in Aukett, 200,000 provision for directors salaries, goodwill write offs etc, so the finals may swing the group to a breakeven postion. | norris28 | |
24/6/2004 07:59 | Surprised there is no MM reaction. Results look dreadful to me. Perhaps, I am just too critical! Rgds dell | dell314 | |
16/6/2004 10:46 | only 3p off their feb04 high o well keep on waiting perhaps pigs might fly? | distill | |
01/6/2004 08:07 | i am out that will do for me coz they were t10's good luck everyone | nissi beach | |
27/5/2004 10:05 | Very strong this morning. Will be interesting to see the trades later. | opthalmist | |
26/5/2004 17:20 | Strange, those buys occurred after the tick up. | opthalmist | |
26/5/2004 16:14 | Expecting a large 'T' buy to be reported around close. | opthalmist | |
26/5/2004 14:49 | Spread changed from 2.5/2.65 to 2.75/2.95. Quite a move. | opthalmist | |
26/5/2004 14:37 | Blimey, it moved. | opthalmist | |
25/5/2004 17:17 | Nice 130k buy and a positive RNS. Looks OK. | opthalmist | |
25/5/2004 09:16 | dell314 Cheers, i was going to sell awhile ago when they were .065p but was on holiday and all they have done since is plumit, perhaps i'll have to wait another year gd | distill | |
24/5/2004 07:58 | distill - From a quick skim through accounts, these look reasonable until you realise that the accounts are qualified by the auditors. This is never a decision taken lightly and there would have been many discussions to try and avoid qualification, so it is always serious when it happens IMO. It appears that the overdraft facilities have been reduced(expire Nov 04) and leave practically no margin for project delays or any other unforseen circumstances. Assuming the revised board have a collective IQ higher than half a biscuit, I would guess that they will be attempting to strengthen the balance sheet with further funding of one form or another. I imagine that the downward trend is for this reason... Rgds dell | dell314 | |
22/5/2004 08:39 | it looks to me when a few sellers appear they slash the price to stop others. then a few buyers appear which i have been recently but the price never goes back up even if all the stock is bought. they must be running a flat book the way the offer jumps on the 1st buy they are also trying to make sure it does not appear in the top losers/gainers because this would attract too much attention and trades (particulary buys) would increase upseting there balance | nissi beach | |
21/5/2004 15:15 | Lack of volume I would guess. Any half decent amount of buying and the price soon goes back up, so it doesn't look like the MMs have huge amounts of stock on their books. Bid ticking up as I type.. | opthalmist | |
21/5/2004 15:14 | so whats driving the price down........sentimen | distill | |
21/5/2004 11:46 | They are profitable. See the last results (December). | opthalmist |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions