We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ascent Resources Plc | LSE:AST | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BJVH7905 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.20 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 2.20 | 700,813 | 08:00:14 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 581k | -41.89M | -0.1004 | -0.22 | 9.18M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/2/2024 15:22 | We have secured "after the event" insurance so there won't be a problem. The next twelve months they'll be talking about "disclosure" ! | chinese investor | |
30/1/2024 13:18 | "In litigation, the usual position in relation to costs is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the successful party’s recoverable costs. Such costs may be substantial, especially when dealing with cases involving a foreign element which gives rise to additional costs, eg travel, expert evidence on foreign law, etc. While a defendant may be confident of their ability to defend the claim, they may nevertheless have concerns about potential difficulties in recovering costs that are provided for in any costs order against the claimant. The purpose of a security for costs order, which is an interim remedy, is to alleviate that concern by requiring the claimant to pay money into court, or to provide some other form of security, as a precondition to being able to continue with the claim. Where an order for security for costs is made, the proceedings will often be stayed, pending payment or provision of security" | razoblade | |
29/1/2024 10:23 | ICSID Latest :- November 20, 2023 The Respondent files a request for security for costs. December 5, 2023 The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s request for security for costs. December 12, 2023 The Respondent files a reply to the Claimant’s response on the request for security for costs. December 19, 2023 The Claimants’ file a rejoinder to the Respondent’s reply on the request for security for costs. January 5, 2024 The Respondent files a further reply on the request for security for costs. January 12, 2024 The Claimants file comments to the Respondent's further reply for security for costs. So there is an ongoing conversation between us and them ! There could be an agreement at any time ! | chinese investor | |
25/1/2024 23:04 | razor- it is not what you should do in Slovenia it is what you can do "because of who you know", Governance is for outside of Slovenia, If you are in Slovenia the rules do not apply. But, Fortunately where we are taking Slovenia for £650M+ the jurisdiction is outside of Slovenia (& the EU) where they have ZERO control. Thankfully!. This whole debacle just explains 100% why the 27 states of the European Union will never be a success as they are unable to follow Government guidance/policies, they will agree to policies but then ignore them..... I am 100% certain we will all be Compensated fairly in time, But for now Back in the bottom draw for a while but just amazed how some supposedly developed world jurisdictions act. SO GLAD THE UK IS OUTSIDE OF THE EU MAFIA. | linesal2 | |
22/1/2024 14:36 | I wonder why the court agree to a hearing and then make a decision without one. Arbitration Courts should also be informed how part gov owned company goes bust when told to cough up to 8 million. | razoblade | |
19/1/2024 16:17 | well, that stinks of the Slovenian government. Not over yet. | linesal2 | |
15/1/2024 13:44 | If we are claiming circa £8m in revenue for the period 2019-2023 if we did take over geo the turnover must be greater than £3m a year, can't seem to find geos balance sheet as behind a paywall. | linesal2 | |
15/1/2024 13:41 | Good to see allign adding to their holdings,RNS out. | linesal2 | |
15/1/2024 10:05 | Can't gloss over the fact last week's news was dreadful but if we take over the Joint Partner's operation we might be getting a really good income stream from ALL of the wells. Those local companies still need gas ! | chinese investor | |
15/1/2024 07:06 | The only correct decision, But I am surprised given Slovenia's track record. was a shame so many sold thinking everything was lost, expect a big bounce. Keep the faith. Looks like my buying over for a bit (well dip buying anyway). Taking over all Geo assets sounds nice! | linesal2 | |
15/1/2024 07:03 | RNS out. Great news | dodd5y | |
10/1/2024 00:00 | you may be right. you pay your money and take your chances. or you bail. each to their own, there is no cut-and-drawn answer. | linesal2 | |
09/1/2024 19:46 | Not worth the risk reward now in holding | ic0gcds00 | |
09/1/2024 17:39 | I am still topping up, I appreciate now a higher risk but so is the potential reward. It just seems very convenient for Geo to file for insolvency just as they are about to get a big claim to pay, this stinks of the government colluding with Geo, I am sure AST's lawyers will be putting that forward along with the criminal case for the directors. I believe if production had stopped AST would have suspended the shares. | linesal2 | |
09/1/2024 17:32 | Nothing has stopped the claim against The slovenian government- in fact it is now even more in AST's favour due to the current corruption, might be a wait but already been over 18 months. | linesal2 | |
09/1/2024 14:28 | I sold up here at a loss since there is now no hope at all. | luckyabbeygale | |
09/1/2024 11:47 | Does that mean work on PG-10 and PG-11 has stopped ? | chinese investor | |
08/1/2024 17:33 | what a crooked country slovenia is..no wonder their flag is the same as russias | iceagefarmer | |
08/1/2024 16:07 | No they don't not if they're in the EU. All the Ukrainians did in 2013-14 was to vote for a trading alliance with Russia rather than the EU and next thing they had an orange revolution instigated by cia snipers shooting at civilians at demonstrations instigated by newly created NGO owned media stations. Slovenians would have noted that even if western media/populace still live in denial over what happened. | bad gateway | |
08/1/2024 15:52 | Ouch. Unfortunately the problem is Slovenia can stick two fingers up to AST. They have got Russia to do trade with. Eastern block comrades always been the same and corruption is expected when dealing with each other. | digger2779 | |
08/1/2024 15:45 | Thankfully the Slovenian Government is deeply in the companies involved, so AST will get paid out one way or the other. This will do tremendous damage to Slovenian investor relations if they do not step in before court action. | linesal2 | |
08/1/2024 15:23 | Well, it is all happening in Slovenia, Seems like a few more Slovenian crooks are going to get locked up. Interesting times ahead. | linesal2 | |
05/1/2024 19:39 | other than the main claim (£650M+) we have the circa £8m payout by the end of qtr1 which was April so brought forward?, so the current claim of £8m equates to £2m a year (2019-2023 £8m/4) we will now be getting the money from all the wells which could take our £580k per year to circa £2.5m per year if those wells are still producing, none of that is priced in at all IMHO once the actual payout is known we will know the expected future figures, there could be some good surprises to the upside this year starting with the payout award. I am currently adding on dips (not large amounts but enough). | linesal2 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions