We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angus Energy Plc | LSE:ANGS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWKC989 | ORD GBP0.002 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.425 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.425 | 0.425 | 0.43 | 318,342 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 28.21M | 117.81M | 0.0325 | 0.13 | 15.21M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
26/10/2021 09:15 | Investors here have had plenty of time to see the trading patterns: Anything over 1p is "always" sold into... mainly because of options / warrants being exercised, but also because Anguish will need more cash and will most likely (IMHO) take the opportunity of an share price rally to do another raise. The Market need proof before Pudding - this time - George! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
26/10/2021 09:15 | jtisadly - another desperate attempt at negativity from this disingenuous, discredited, ridiculed old fool... so predictable... who's up next to post another attempt at negativity ... uclot, ja51contractvoidoile | sincero1 | |
26/10/2021 09:05 | The hedged volumes in the table late in the report refer to over 5mmcfd from October. The profitability assumptions are based on volume data provided by Anguish in February 2020 and unrevised since then. So it all depends on their meeting the volume predictions. Is this correct? Over 5mmcfd hedged from October? That doesn’t sound like a very conservative figure, does it? There’s no mention as far as I can see of what happens if volume disappoints and there are clauses in the new report dissociating the authors from responsibility for the volume projections. So, do you think they’ll be producing gas by July at volumes that will meet the hedge terms? That’s the only question that matters. Nothing in this report has changed, apart from the loan terms, gas prices and the start date. It all depends on data provided by Anguish. There are, however, some dates in here. The remaining 100 metres of pipe to start being laid this week. So expect another RNS in the next 3 days. The sidetrack is scheduled for early January - assuming this vital piece arrives from the US by then. Presumably, it’s already in the sea lanes. We had an assurance re this last week from the Interim MD, didn’t we? | jtidsbadly | |
26/10/2021 08:19 | how long until we get "its a pump and dump" post from one of our resident grey old disingenuous window lickers... | sincero1 | |
26/10/2021 08:07 | This should be 2p+ | gaffer73 | |
26/10/2021 08:05 | told you so..so predictable | johncasey | |
26/10/2021 07:53 | i still think ironveld is the share to be in though..extroadinary volume in that one last two days..only going on way | johncasey | |
26/10/2021 07:41 | 13reallneedsahobby47 | sincero1 | |
26/10/2021 07:37 | Problem is the same negative troll could be right about Angus, just like about Vast. For me I couldn't risk it again on the ones they post on. | luckyabbeygale | |
26/10/2021 07:32 | think i might have to buy more today...cracking update | johncasey | |
26/10/2021 07:31 | Just more of the same from Anguish, cost overruns and delays. They've been telling us they were drilling experts for years but now have to engage drilling experts? It was the same with the finance. Brockham's a dead duck as far as I'm concerned as is Lidsey but why haven't they updated market about the appeal (or not as the case may be) with Balcombe? They clearly informed market (and AJ Lucas for that matter) that they would lodge an appeal, so what's happened to it? | 1347 | |
26/10/2021 07:24 | Another 100 million slots on the bottom line 7p | markbarker | |
26/10/2021 07:24 | rns out and another slap in the mutton chops of our resident disingenuous grey old window lickers....embarrass | sincero1 | |
25/10/2021 21:48 | Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam, spam spam spam egg and spam; ...spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam, egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam; | 1347 | |
25/10/2021 16:00 | 3Put appears to be the spam in a troll sandwich, what? | jtidsbadly | |
25/10/2021 15:18 | some old grey disingenuous window lickers from insulate britain sticking themselves to the roads again today...and the resident old grey disingenuous window lickers aren't posting here today ... coincidence ?... obviously uclot doesn't post until he is told what to think so that explains his absence... hopefully he is getting mental health support... | sincero1 | |
25/10/2021 14:50 | Why don't we have any trolling today? | 3put | |
25/10/2021 09:10 | posting at the weekend ... tut tut ... disingenuous ... | sincero1 | |
24/10/2021 11:18 | Come on look on the bright side, the CATF will have given Anguish Energy a clean bill of health, no danger of any hydrocarbons or their by products at any Anguish site is there. | 1347 | |
23/10/2021 17:12 | HITS: I should think the OGA’s file on Anguish is getting quite thick. What about the decision not to conduct a well test on the putative sidetrack? | jtidsbadly | |
23/10/2021 16:06 | Sudden new plans for Brockham, utterly coincidentally just one week before the latest OGA licence extension is set to expire... wonder why? This is the latest example of the desperation shown by onshore O&G micro-caps to make out that once named "assets" that have all been repeatedly proven to be drier than Gandhi's flip-flops are actually worth yet another crack... honest, guv! (Despite the additional teensy important fact that none of them have enough funds available to take yet another futile punt anywhere). No, this is all about pretending there's still life in a long-dead licence to avoid the need for said licence not being renewed and abandonment costs being required. Norwegian Blue comes very much to mind here... is the OGA still sufficiently dense to fall for this again? | headinthesand | |
23/10/2021 14:53 | 1347: I’m afraid that AAOG has drawn down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. Mr. Forrest’s activities there are a mystery to me and if he’s still hoping to make his fortune by getting his noble chums to bring Poundland to fruition for £2.5mm, that boat has sailed. And Poundland is rapidly taking on water. Yes, UKOG is further into borrowed time even than is Anguish. And Mr. Vonk appears to have been a genius compared with this lot. No wonder Jonathan was so assiduous in his support, what? Good luck with that 4p. Michael only wanted 2.4p. He must still be invested here, poor chap. Still, the memory of those one or two lusty blows must compensate to some degree, I should think. | jtidsbadly | |
23/10/2021 14:17 | "They need to stop all this nonsense" Well that's what Lucan said he would do, he made it a 'selling pont' when he arrived as a recall. No I see no sign of the nonsense stopping, in fact I'd say it's worse now than when Vonk was around and will only stop when the FCA or the OGA or someone else with authority bring it to a shuddering halt. However they appear to be asleep on the job so that could be a while yet and I hope it will be after I can grab that escape hatch on a decent king tide. Incidentally UKOG is no better, possibly worse, so hopefully Karma kicks in for both at some point. PS: Heard anything more about AAOG and their potential acquisition of part of Poundland? | 1347 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions