[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Angus Energy Plc LSE:ANGS London Ordinary Share GB00BYWKC989 ORD GBP0.002
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.05 -5.88% 0.80 0.75 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.80 4,771,038 08:42:03
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.1 -2.5 -0.4 - 8

Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10576 to 10599 of 14875 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  427  426  425  424  423  422  421  420  419  418  417  416  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
28/9/2021
16:47
Uclot- "Say what you like about JTids and JA... but they've been proven to be RIGHT far more times than you ...(IN)Sincerio" Ok here is just some of jtisadlys recent predictions..just the 17 completely incorrect, please post 18 times I have been incorrect.... good luck with that as they don't exist , you have just made it up .. this will FINALLY show you that you have been brainwashed. seek help. 5.7.21 "placing this week or next" 8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months" 9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested" 14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year" 21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 18+ weeks ago. " share price into the sixties shortly " 19+ weeks ago. "oga approval doubt" . " financing doubt" . " running out of money " weekly prediction for last 9 months. " 0.15 by end of year". " placing soon " daily prediction for last 9 months. "its a pump & dump" - it wasn't. "gas to Shell at current prices from New Year until July in decent volumes. I' put the chances of that at about 1%" "you should be pleased - that 0.70p re-entry level of yours is just round the corner. They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" - And from the interim : As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".
sincero1
28/9/2021
16:29
lets also not forget Jtisadly's "They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" and this was supported ferociously by Ja51"contractvoid"oiler "THEY WERE OUT OF MONEY!!!" And lets look at the rns from the interim : As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".... complete fruit loops fabricating to suit and the weak minded believe it..dear oh dear...
whocares765
28/9/2021
16:09
Say what you like about JTids and JA... but they've been proven to be RIGHT far more times than you & others (IN)Sincerio. They questioned the purchase of Saltfleetby (aka Poundland) and it's low asking price at the time - for instance. They also predicted delays on delivery back in 2020 and again in 2021 which have played out in full. They predicted issues on all the oil assets(?) and questioned their liabilities. They have also asked pertinent questions about the MD's supposedly "temporary" post... the office move (which never happened) and the reason we are still paying Jonathan Tidswell? Their current argument for clarity on the hedges is a vitally important one which the company should address as a matter of urgency! They are both well researched and pose legitimate questions that should be of concern to shareholders and would-be investors IMHO. CQ ;-)
clottedq
28/9/2021
15:51
lets also not forget Jtisadly's "They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" and this was supported ferociously by Ja51"contractvoid"oiler "THEY WERE OUT OF MONEY!!!" And lets look at the rns from the interim : As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".... complete fruit loops fabricating to suit and the weak minded believe it..dear oh dear...
sincero1
28/9/2021
15:32
jtisadly"Any mug punter who’s persuaded by their piffle.." lets see some of this imbeciles recent posts: 5.7.21 "placing this week or next" 8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months" 9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested" 14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year" 21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 17+ weeks ago. " share price into the sixties shortly " 18+ weeks ago. "oga approval doubt" . " financing doubt" . " running out of money " weekly prediction for last 9 months. " 0.15 by end of year". " placing soon " daily prediction for last 9 months. "its a pump & dump" - it wasn't. "gas to Shell at current prices from New Year until July in decent volumes. I' put the chances of that at about 1%" "you should be pleased - that 0.70p re-entry level of yours is just round the corner. Its posts like these that are mentally damaging the below average intelligent followers...shame on you .
sincero1
28/9/2021
15:31
Calling Saltfleetby "PoundLand" is fitting IMHO. There's no disguising the fact that good old George trumped it up as a cheap way of making money for shareholders... only he underestimated the costs by circa £10 million and the company is now heavily indebted and over a barrel to its financiers as a result. Anyone with half a brain realised that this was just "TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE" at the time (and many said so!) so why didn't our finance expert George Lucan recognise the pitfalls? As I said: let's see what happens... but the current geothermal rhetoric reminds me of the gas rhetoric before it which helped to transition us from the oil rhetoric before that... healthy scepticism IMHO. CQ ;-)
clottedq
28/9/2021
15:28
uclot -" I would like to see Angus SUCCEED - .....Equally, I would genuinely like to see Angus FAIL..." The other old grey window lickers have got you into such a spin you have lost the plot and no longer make any sense...they did it to clickbait and now you are another victim. seek mental health support as a matter of urgency.
sincero1
28/9/2021
15:26
Even your derogatory term for Saltfleeby says it all... I suspect you are intent to see this company fail and blow out all Angus Energy shareholders...
whocares765
28/9/2021
15:25
My current issue is the sudden enthusiastic rhetoric around "Geothermal" seems to me to be an intentional distraction by management. I doubt anyone invested here is desperate for news on a geothermal project that could take several years to prove up? They invested in gas that was just around the corner "supposedly"... but this is what Anguish keep doing: They promise one thing... kick the can on another thing... then fail to deliver on either. This repetitive cycle needs to be broken... and they need to CONCENTRATE ON DELIVERY AT POUND LAND! Then everyone would be happy. Myself included. CQ ;-)
clottedq
28/9/2021
15:22
Even your derogatory term for Saltfleeby says it all... I suspect you are intent to see this company fail and blow out all Angus Energy shareholders....
whocares765
28/9/2021
15:19
WhoCares, Why is that a negative bias? I am saying that I want to see Angus succeed - if they fulfil their latest promise. And if they don't, I think they should be struck off - having already had a string of failures to their name, I don't think anyone could argue that they are fit for purpose anymore at that point - do you? I am prepared to wait to see how PoundLand fares. CQ ;-)
clottedq
28/9/2021
15:17
CQ That suggests to me, with the negative bias your desire is No 2----I think he is past the point of caring tbh regrading the outcome. I suspect JT is in the same boat. However there is a reason people paid 4p/5p not so long ago......The asset is there we just need somebody to do their job properly and get it out the ground.
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:15
I would like to see Angus SUCCEED---We all want that. I don't want it to fail but I do want management held to account if they don't deliver against the business plan.
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:13
CQ That suggests to me, with the negative bias your desire is No 2. Well I am a long only investor and therefore will always be countering your views. Good luck!
whocares765
28/9/2021
15:11
WhoCares: I am a reasonable man: 1) I would like to see Angus SUCCEED - so long as they fulfil their promises and finally make some profit for their long suffering shareholders. or: 2) Equally, I would genuinely like to see Angus FAIL - if they continue to squander shareholder's hard earned money making spurious claims that are never fulfilled. Under these circumstances I feel it better to have bad managers struck off, so they are unable to cause further hardship to honest hard working private investors. Reasonable & fair in my book? CQ ;-)
clottedq
28/9/2021
15:09
Geothermal update tomorrow, lets see what that brings. Good night everyone
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:09
Until then, I remain deeply suspicious about this BOD's motives and their alignment with private investors. I will continue to keep a close eye on their statements and measure these against their delivery in the fullness of time---Please do , its important to have different opinions on forums.
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:09
CQ: I’ve filtered them all - the Cudswallop crew. I haven’t filtered Mark. I quite enjoy his, though deplore the homophobia. Any mug punter who’s persuaded by their piffle is, as I’ve said before, destined to lose his money in some ill-advised gamble or other. It might as well go on keeping His Lordship in Rouser Trousers and natty blue and pink shooting attire, what?
jtidsbadly
28/9/2021
15:08
If the company come good on any promise in the future... I will walk away-----That's investing, you may walk away with a profit or a loss. Everyone should do their own research. Cheerleaders/rampers/ de-rampers/ stale bulls make no difference here. The share price has been flat for 6 months
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:07
Private investors should be free to make their own mistakes, but they should hear BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY first. Lies should be rightfully called out to enable new investors to make a judgement based upon FACTS. Balanced free speech is all I have ever strived for here----Agree
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:06
I was hoodwinked myself by The Weald "Story" claims of U-Dog and Anguish - expectations which proved to be unfounded despite repeated assurances from the BOD's of both companies-----LTHs have not been treated well, no doubt about that. But that was under a different management and a different business plan
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:05
Simply telling it "as it is"... and as it "has been" for as long as I have been unfortunate enough to be invested here----Some people that are new investors like myself are also telling it how it is from my view point
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
15:04
There are too many cheerleaders here trying to rope in newbie investors on spurious claims-----There is also a bit of de-ramping as well ;)
ultimatejustice9
28/9/2021
14:56
CQ that's absolutely fair enough... But you have failed to answer my last query ...Would you like to see ANGUS ENERGY go bust?
whocares765
Chat Pages: Latest  427  426  425  424  423  422  421  420  419  418  417  416  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
ANGS
Angus Ener..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211202 15:16:22