We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angus Energy Plc | LSE:ANGS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWKC989 | ORD GBP0.002 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.375 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.38 | 1,453,570 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 3.14M | -111.95M | -0.0309 | -0.12 | 13.4M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/6/2021 10:52 | It’s getting frenetic on the other site. Is this the start of the pre-placing pump and dump? | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 10:13 | Jonathan will be unlikely to want public attention to be drawn again to the insalubrious and humiliating events of a few years ago, what? Or of the Captain America saga. The Chairman would doubtless be more comfortable in the absence of self-inflicted Press coverage of his recent history as a protector of shareholders’ interests in his capacity as a non-executive director, what? The interim MD’s reputation would not be enhanced by a public examination of his assurances as to Anguish’s financial condition last summer, either. Among other claims. No, I don’t think there’s any basis for, or likelihood of, libel proceedings. But I’d be happy to be proved wrong. These things justify a proper public airing and the participation of two Earls would guarantee red-top newspaper attention and might even be the catalyst for the long overdue process of clearing out the Augean stables that AIM has become. | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 09:55 | uclot - you seem to be very very agitated ,are you worried about something ? I am merely pointing out when you post fabrication and you clearly don't like it. Perhaps if you try and stay truthful i won't have the need to reply , that goes for everyone else. Remember truth is a good defence " bad feedback " is not.... hehehehe | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 09:51 | I see that Anguish are getting a couple of days’ worth of working capital, for 5% of a worthless asset of which they owned 75% and were writing off 18 months ago. Then, of course, they discovered they needed the balance sheet to include the abandonment costs, so they wrote it back in. Excellent creative management. The Chairman at least should be happy with it, he’s had plenty of experience of observing that kind of thing as Chairman of NMC’s Audit Committee. Still, it’s a few thousand they weren’t otherwise getting.. Brockham is a a distraction. So is Lidsey. Their usefulness as a distraction is their only value. It's interesting that Anguish’s assets are now held in a sort of escrow account by Law Debenture. The latest accounts are due next week for AEWB3, aren’t they? I dare say they’ll be late, in common with those of SEL and Forum. Though I suppose it makes little difference, they belong to Angus only technically now. And for how much longer? | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 09:49 | Dear Napoleon, Get over yourself... Nobody gives a sh*t... least of all me. My last EVER response to you. I'm here to enjoy the next episode of the "Anguish Energy Soap Opera"... and you're like an annoying little kid constantly rattling sweet wrappers behind me. CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
15/6/2021 09:46 | How do you prove libel UK? The defendant must have communicated a false statement as fact. The statement must have identified or referred to the plaintiff. The statement must have been published, for example online. | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 09:19 | uclot "Thesharemaster is just another insincere alter ego - and there have already been so many." - that is completely untrue ... i would've thought you would be careful what you write considering what trouble you may well already be in ... | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 09:15 | JT, Thesharemaster is just another insincere alter ego - and there have already been so many. Boring! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
15/6/2021 09:11 | I see the share price mini spike has already been punctured by cold hard reality... in truth all that has happened is Al(iba)ba have got rid of a worthless asset and Anguish have gained a greater percentage of one - together with a few valuable(LOL) Al(iba)ba shares... God give me strength! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
15/6/2021 09:01 | jtisbadly " Quite a few people here have researched it in some detail " 27.5.21 - "poor angus 0.2 soon " still too soon ? " share price into the sixties shortly " still too shortly ? | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 08:58 | and uclot makes your point sharemaster.... i just point and laugh ... | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 08:57 | Thesharemaster: everyone on this board other than a few company shills welcomes reasoned debate on the merits of investing in Angus Energy. Quite a few people here have researched it in some detail and all who have are extremely sceptical of what the management tells the market. It is a little one sided though so I for one would welcome your input. Why do you think this is a good investment? | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 08:56 | Thesharemaster - Dear oh dear...you couldn't be more transparent if you tried. And: nobody is "happily invested" in Anguish! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
15/6/2021 08:52 | I THINK EVERY TIME NOW THAT ANGUS RELEASE AN RNS THE MARKET HAS A GOOD LAUGH AND IGNORES... | clickbait | |
15/6/2021 08:28 | Lucan should have learnt by now: The inexperienced need to learn to crawl before they can run! It's Poundland or bust IMHO... the old Weald Fairy-tale assets are going nowhere without massive risk and yet another pot of shareholder's gold to pay for the pursuit of this folly. Shows you how valuable these other assets are when Alba have to actually pay us to take them! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
15/6/2021 08:27 | ...not Law Debenture, that is, but Mercuria. | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 08:26 | gkb47: I read it as meaning that they hold the shares as security for the loan. I don’t recall mention of this in the RNS’s. Basically, though, they’re the puppet masters here now, what? I mean to say. | jtidsbadly | |
15/6/2021 07:43 | thesharemaster - you have to realise that the resident window lickers here can't accept that anyone can trade angs shares successfully , ja51"contractvoid"oi | sincero1 | |
15/6/2021 05:36 | I see that Law Debenture now holds 75% or more of the share capital of Angus Energy Weald Basin No.3. This is the Angus group's operating subsidiary and the owner of the tax losses. I’d missed this earlier. Is it significant? | jtidsbadly | |
14/6/2021 21:19 | ..I should have mentioned also that in August there was a nice little ramp which got Rupert out nicely, wasn’t there? I’m sure these things are not connected but I doubt this could have been achieved if the market had known, as the Anguish Board did, that the Saltfleetby project was £12mm. over budget. | jtidsbadly | |
14/6/2021 21:05 | gkb47: yes, a lot of nonsense, they’re hardly going to draw attention to their own past activities are they? Particularly in the cases of Captain America and the company chairman. And the principal culprit in terms of misleading shareholders is, of course, the interim MD. Six months from March to September last year with no mention of the need he’d identified, about the time of the publication of the CPR, of a £12mm. shortfall on a £2.5mm. project. Of course, the share price was very low in March/April 2020, he may have thought it couldn’t bear more bad news. Nevertheless, an RNS should have been released, and updated regularly. I think the reason this person is on this site is because they're worried about the research being shared here. And because the system here allows posters to alter retrospectively, or delete, the text of their posts. He’s changed some of his posts a few times already. He did it today. I’ve screenshot a few sample pages of his contributions, in case he decides to wipe them. I did it at random, they’re pretty well all the same. I’ve an idea who he is. | jtidsbadly | |
14/6/2021 20:38 | "AIM LIfestyle company" is a terminology invented by disgruntled investors who saw the BOD's of their company repeatedly FAIL to deliver on deadlines / operational milestones and profitability whilst directors rarely - if ever - invested themselves and yet awarded themselves generous salaries regardless of their performance - which was usually dreadful anyway! Does Anguish tick any of these boxes? It ticks "ALL" of them IMHO CQ ;-) | clottedq |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions