We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angus Energy Plc | LSE:ANGS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWKC989 | ORD GBP0.002 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.05 | -13.33% | 0.325 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.375 | 0.325 | 0.38 | 15,747,930 | 15:40:11 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 3.14M | -111.95M | -0.0309 | -0.10 | 11.59M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/6/2021 13:11 | jtidsadly " Personally, I think they’ll need a placing for these purposes, probably two, in the next few months" pahahaha .. so not only have we had the weekly "placing soon " post , he has doubled it up " probably two " pahahahha... i will add that to this mystics " 0.2 soon" "share price into the sixties shortly " "oga approval doubt" " financing doubt" and the 50 or 60 " running out of money " " placing soon" posts.. all that have been proven not true .. and still this fruit loop keeps saying it ... cuckoo cuckoo.... | sincero1 | |
21/6/2021 12:59 | The PR boys and rampers forget that it's impossible to argue with HISTORICAL FACTS (well they can and do... but just appear like complete fools because of it!) FACTS: Lucan has FAILED to deliver on each and every deadline, operational milestone and financial target he has set himself since the day he started... if that's justification to some for believing he's suddenly turned over a new leaf... then more fool you! That's not even factoring in that Anguish - in all it's history - has NEVER met a single deadline, milestone or target EVER. And they say we can learn from HISTORY? Clearly some folk don't - or else they choose not to! p.s: I am an invested LTH (more fool me)& I speak for myself - as I see fit - and for myself alone. Not paid by anyone (sadly). CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
21/6/2021 12:50 | HITS: the Anguish Board has done very well to assure itself of another 6-9 months’ salary etc. That’s assuming the loan deal allows anything for this. Personally, I think they’ll need a placing for these purposes, probably two, in the next few months, since the £12mm., as discussed in the 29 September presentation, doesn’t include an allowance for Board expenses and Anguish has no other means of support with which to pay them. It’s probably not going to end well for shareholders. The Board has a record, as you've rightly pointed out, of non-performance on either deadlines or budgets. Ever. Re share purchases by Directors, he said they’d consider it. The rampers on the other site are telling porkies. | jtidsbadly | |
21/6/2021 12:33 | uclot - you clearly have no conviction in your claim that 1p will not be achieved this year or next so you bottled my challenge, ran away , hid for a few days , hoping it would be forgotten ... how shameful. Now you are stating , online and publicly, that Angus bod cannot be trusted. Ja51"contractvoid"oi | sincero1 | |
21/6/2021 12:26 | What's far FAR more abnormal is the flat denial of the reality of things. The market clearly couldn't give a rat's behind about any of George's three recent "jam tomorrow...this time... honest" puff and spinfests. It isn't ascribing a shred of value or credibility to a single prediction, promise, forecast, assurance or estimate he's given - and I'd refer you to the current ANGS shareprice to evidence that. What's actually clear is that the market will not get interested in ANGS - one way or the other - unless and until first gas has started to be pumped out of Poundland AND production volumes have been independently audited. This is hardly surprising, given ANGS's unrelenting track record of total non-delivery of anything at all under both historic and current regimes. As for Weald oil re-re-re-re-re-re-re So (and unfortunately for me), the market has priced in fully justifiable cynicism on ANGS, so IMV the share price is not going to move much between now and Q1 2020, at which time we may find out if Poundland is able to be made a going concern or whether it's another Brockham style "sub-commercial" duster. | headinthesand | |
21/6/2021 11:47 | History "always" offers the most accurate research IMHO... ... and trawling through Anguish Energy's history under Lucan (as well as before - although BOTH under Tidswell!) history suggests that: A) Any given deadlines CANNOT BE TRUSTED. B) Any given financial estimates CANNOT BE TRUSTED. C) Any given operational goals CANNOT BE TRUSTED. Nothing has changed - as far as I can see - except the current "story" spoon-fed to shareholders. CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
21/6/2021 11:17 | The "Moron" obviously isn't acquainted with the "The bard"......It's ironic that a ramptastic 3P claim is ignored, but a Half tongue-in-cheek reply is pounced on?.... In reality, if the sidetrack from 5 times failed SF7 isn't successful 0.3p could be a generous valuation! | ja51oiler | |
21/6/2021 10:58 | ja51"contractvoid"oi | sincero1 | |
21/6/2021 09:42 | 3p or 0.3p.....That is the question! | ja51oiler | |
21/6/2021 09:05 | Ultimatejustice9: he was asked whether the Directors would consider buying shares. He replied after a short hesitation that yes, the Directors would consider it. | jtidsbadly | |
21/6/2021 07:15 | so uclot has gone quiet ,wouldn't back up his statement . clearly made up this claim of share price not reaching 1p this year or next ..what a surprise , a spineless coward talking complete nonsense. The shame you feel must be unbearable ... totally discredited again . | sincero1 | |
20/6/2021 23:33 | Did I read that the directors are going to buy? They really should not be saying this before informing the market. I'll reserve judgement until they actually buy shares | ultimatejustice9 | |
20/6/2021 23:32 | Did I read that the directors are going to buy? They really should not be saying this before informing the market. I'll reserve judgement until they actually buy shares | ultimatejustice9 | |
20/6/2021 23:32 | Did I read that the directors are going to buy? They really should not be saying this before informing the market. I'll reserve judgement until they actually buy shares | ultimatejustice9 | |
20/6/2021 18:51 | Chick: yes, you did, they also did some work on other renewables and of course they must have been scrutinising the wording of the multiple loan, security etc. documents. They did well to get the new Lidsey seismic done in such detail, in the circumstances, what? But these are all red herrings. It’s all about Poundland and their ability to meet the loan terms as they start to fall due next year. On this topic, the interim MD is already saying 6-7 months to complete Poundland. That’s into the new year then, before first gas. He’s fudging the date of the sidetrack and whether there will be one or two. Does anyone know now when the first one will be drilled? Will they have to defer first gas, or interrupt it once it’s flowing, to drill a sidetrack? And is a second one planned and if so, when and from which existing well? And will that interrupt gas flow? I think he must be very concerned indeed about meeting the timetable he’s been set. I also think he needs to maximise production for sure by mid-year to ensure that the gas produced exceeds the volume of gas they’ve hedged. But if they drill two sidetracks in year one, at £2.3mm. each, how will they pay/repay the first loan interest/capital repayment on time next June? The issue on the hedges seems to me to be quite important, as I’ve said before (a few times). I imagine Mercuria has set the bar at a demanding level for a reason and I don’t think their interests and those of Anguish shareholders are aligned - unless the Board finds some of the organisational ability and hard work that’s been missing to date. They’ve underestimated budgets and timescales from the very start of the Poundland project, both by huge margins. The AEWB3 accounts were published on 23 June last year. Will it be this Wednesday or will they take a leaf out of their Poundland partner’s book and miss the deadline? | jtidsbadly | |
20/6/2021 18:07 | Did I read that Anguish had spent 60% of their time on the geothermal pixie dust? Why have they not been spending 100% on trying to get this sack of .... working first? | clickbait | |
20/6/2021 18:01 | I can 100% guarantee that I will never break even with this company let alone make a profit. There will be many other shareholders waiting to belt it for the door taking huge losses 1p plus if the mm’s have a tight spread. Not in the year 2021 INMO. | clickbait | |
18/6/2021 17:18 | HITS: I agree about these shysters but it’s probably the only living they can make. Once the coffee shops and fast food restaurants are all open again they may find opportunities elsewhere. I also agree about the interview yesterday. Hopeless. And he didn’t say he’d buy shares, as the shysters on the other bulletin board are claiming, he said they’d consider it. It’s not the same thing, is it? You could add another section to your AIM oiler CEO questionnaire on the lines of: You've given an expensive shareholder presentation of developments at your company and your plans for the intermediate future. The reaction is a fall in the share price on pathetic volume. Do you: 1. Resign? 2. Do some work, to try to make the company a success/save it from bankruptcy? 3. Employ more paid shills to disguise the appalling state your company is in, and carry on as before? 4. Ignore the situation at your AIM company and spend more time on your other business interests? AND: The money you have borrowed has to be spent on just one of your projects. You are not permitted to borrow any more money and you have no money for Board salaries, club memberships, subsistence, Wilton’s, port etc. Do you (you may select up to 2 options)? 1. Resign? 2. Reduce Board and other expenses to the bone? 3. Buy lots of shares in your own name to encourage investors that all is well? 4. Wheedle money from the project budget to defray these justifiable expenses? 5. Employ more PR people and paid shills to ramp the share price before having a share placing? | jtidsbadly | |
18/6/2021 16:36 | For the record, I'm only staying around and not dropping my sell order trigger because my irritation with the clueless shysters on the ANGS board ("board" in the sense both of BoD and the PR drone/short-term trader infested bulletin board next door) is a lot higher than any need to cash out. Despite the furious pompom waving following George's latest (and by now, frankly embarrassing) damp squib interview, I really wasn't holding my breath for a 1.0p close today. | headinthesand | |
18/6/2021 15:45 | i'm off to enjoy my weekend, no doubt relaxing and sleeping well. I predict that uclot will not accept my challenge as he knows he is talking nonsense, oh the shame of having to accept he was wrong . Ja51"contractvoid"oi | sincero1 | |
18/6/2021 15:06 | In order for libel to be actionable, a defamatory statement must be "of and concerning" the plaintiff : JA51OILER - 31 Mar 2021 - As JT has pointed out, if there was a contract still in place with Shell as you maintain, Angus would be in breach for non-delivery and it would now be void. Oh dear ja51"contractvoid"oi brown trousers on standby ... | sincero1 | |
18/6/2021 15:00 | seems lucky-strike is as keen as our resident "moron" to answer tricky questions over on the other side......cut from the same cloth no doubt? | ja51oiler |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions