Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[sincero1] 15/6/2021 09:01

jtisbadly " Quite a few people here have researched it in some detail " 27.5.21 - "poor angus 0.2 soon " still too soon ? " share price into the sixties shortly " still too shortly ?

[sincero1] 15/6/2021 08:58

and uclot makes your point sharemaster.... i just point and laugh ...

[jtidsbadly] 15/6/2021 08:57

Thesharemaster: everyone on this board other than a few company shills welcomes reasoned debate on the merits of investing in Angus Energy. Quite a few people here have researched it in some detail and all who have are extremely sceptical of what the management tells the market. It is a little one sided though so I for one would welcome your input. Why do you think this is a good investment?

[clottedq] 15/6/2021 08:56

Thesharemaster - Dear oh dear...you couldn't be more transparent if you tried.

And: nobody is "happily invested" in Anguish!

CQ ;-)

[clickbait] 15/6/2021 08:52

I THINK EVERY TIME NOW THAT ANGUS RELEASE AN RNS THE MARKET HAS A GOOD LAUGH AND IGNORES...

[clottedq] 15/6/2021 08:28

Lucan should have learnt by now:

The inexperienced need to learn to crawl before they can run!

It's Poundland or bust IMHO... the old Weald Fairy-tale assets are going nowhere without massive risk and yet another pot of shareholder's gold to pay for the pursuit of this folly.

Shows you how valuable these other assets are when Alba have to actually pay us to take them!

CQ ;-)

[jtidsbadly] 15/6/2021 08:27

...not Law Debenture, that is, but Mercuria.

[jtidsbadly] 15/6/2021 08:26

gkb47: I read it as meaning that they hold the shares as security for the loan. I don’t recall mention of this in the RNS’s. Basically, though, they’re the puppet masters here now, what? I mean to say.

[sincero1] 15/6/2021 07:43

thesharemaster - you have to realise that the resident window lickers here can't accept that anyone can trade angs shares successfully , ja51"contractvoid"oiler gets particularly upset because he claims to be well researched and well informed and still lost all his money trading angs . I wouldn't worry you seem to be doing ok, get satisfaction from his jealousy. The recent ramp up in anger here is due to serious worry . There is a question on the angs website asking what the company is doing or might do about libellous posts in online forums. Since then these old duffers have been in meltdown ..... i wonder why ...

[jtidsbadly] 15/6/2021 05:36

I see that Law Debenture now holds 75% or more of the share capital of Angus Energy Weald Basin No.3. This is the Angus group's operating subsidiary and the owner of the tax losses. I’d missed this earlier. Is it significant?

[jtidsbadly] 14/6/2021 21:19

..I should have mentioned also that in August there was a nice little ramp which got Rupert out nicely, wasn’t there? I’m sure these things are not connected but I doubt this could have been achieved if the market had known, as the Anguish Board did, that the Saltfleetby project was £12mm. over budget.

[jtidsbadly] 14/6/2021 21:05

gkb47: yes, a lot of nonsense, they’re hardly going to draw attention to their own past activities are they? Particularly in the cases of Captain America and the company chairman. And the principal culprit in terms of misleading shareholders is, of course, the interim MD. Six months from March to September last year with no mention of the need he’d identified, about the time of the publication of the CPR, of a £12mm. shortfall on a £2.5mm. project. Of course, the share price was very low in March/April 2020, he may have thought it couldn’t bear more bad news. Nevertheless, an RNS should have been released, and updated regularly.

I think the reason this person is on this site is because they're worried about the research being shared here. And because the system here allows posters to alter retrospectively, or delete, the text of their posts. He’s changed some of his posts a few times already. He did it today. I’ve screenshot a few sample pages of his contributions, in case he decides to wipe them. I did it at random, they’re pretty well all the same. I’ve an idea who he is.

[clottedq] 14/6/2021 20:38

"AIM LIfestyle company" is a terminology invented by disgruntled investors who saw the BOD's of their company repeatedly FAIL to deliver on deadlines / operational milestones and profitability whilst directors rarely - if ever - invested themselves and yet awarded themselves generous salaries regardless of their performance - which was usually dreadful anyway!

Does Anguish tick any of these boxes?

It ticks "ALL" of them IMHO

CQ ;-)

[clottedq] 14/6/2021 20:08

Napoleon is still posting I see... and although he questions my terminology, I note that he hasn't yet denied my diagnosis!?!?!

One very sad little man :-(

In the meantime (and the reason prospective investors bother to read these pages) Anguish BOD are still languishing in the realms of fantasy: "hoping" to pump oil.... "hoping" to pump gas and "hoping" - in a rainbow land very very VERY far away - to contribute to geothermal energy.

Personally, I abide by tried and tested logic:

If someone is incapable of achieving a goal you set for them the first time... it's reasonable to give them a second chance "under stricter supervision". If they fail a second time... the sensible, TAKE NO PRISONERS!
For anyone foolish enough to still believe their bullsh*t for a third time or more... well... you deserve everything you get IMHO.

How many goes "at getting it right" have Anguish had to date? Sorry, I seem to have lost count!

CQ ;-)

[jtidsbadly] 14/6/2021 19:44

Yes, that just shows what kind of person you are. You’re Anguish’s Tom Riddle, aren’t you? A thoroughly unpleasant piece of work. When the inquiry starts into the misleading of shareholders here, you’ll doubtless dob them all in. It’s your stock in trade. What?

[sincero1] 14/6/2021 18:56

uclot - a simple Google definition of syndrome and complex will show what a cretin you are. try not to worry to much..tricky i know after what you published online as fact....

[sincero1] 14/6/2021 18:53

ja51"contractvoid"oiler now denying the share price has ever been 0.50..again just making stuff up to suit narrative. you would think in his postion he would be careful what he says...anyone can see what the share price was in late march to early april 2020...was 0.425 23rd march, 0.41 1st april. What an imbecile. embarrassed and ridiculed again...

[jtidsbadly] 14/6/2021 18:01

JA51: yes, there’s a lot of it about. Mercuria and the new boys will be wanting to monetise the shares with which they were paid at a value of 0.9429p, what? They need the price higher. There’s quite a large share overhang here, what, what? And more shares to come soon under the loan agreement. Then there’s this disputed invoice.. Bad show, what? Then there’s g&a expenses and some outstanding creditors to pay, from when they ran out of money a couple of months ago, what, what? Where will those come from? They’re not in the loan agreement, are they? They need the share price higher for, dare I say? - a placing. Yes, a placing! Or, to put it another way, a working capital buffer.

[ja51oiler] 14/6/2021 17:22

"Got in at 0.5" ? Now there is something that Syndromecero1 should look into ! When exactly did you manage that extraordinarily lucky trade.... 1 post "Thesharemaster"?

[sincero1] 14/6/2021 17:16

jtidsbadly 27.5.21 - " 0.20 soon " still too soon ? what about "share price into sixties shortly" ? what's your definition of shortly ? or soon for that matter ?

[jtidsbadly] 14/6/2021 17:09

Yes, and the poor chap was given the bum’s rush recently at Challenger too, wasn’t he? So he’s had the time on his hands to offer lots of verbiage but absolutely no analysis here, what? Is he off the port circulation list too?

[sincero1] 14/6/2021 16:55

uclot - i was clearly being generous when i said you were of below average intelligence . you found the most mickey mouse website to justify yourself but let's not let the truth get in the way of your narrative , it appears to be a running theme with you . I prefer to research on proper websites . I know you are very worried but you really seem to be losing it .