ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

TOM Tomco Energy Plc

0.0385
0.00 (0.00%)
03 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Tomco Energy Investors - TOM

Tomco Energy Investors - TOM

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Tomco Energy Plc TOM London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 0.0385 07:46:55
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385
more quote information »
Industry Sector
OIL & GAS PRODUCERS

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 29/4/2024 17:42 by 1dutchman
It is difficult to understand how investors are still holding. There is no hope of finance and either administration or another massive dilution are only days or weeks away. Even the rampers have given up and gone home. I'm guessing that anyone still holding have written off this dog.
Posted at 26/4/2024 12:37 by 1dutchman
TD - No 18302 - "...the TOM board have failed to understand that even if you run a narrative company, you still have to invest in the narrative." Sad but true.
In retrospect, it is hard to believe that even a narrative company could have based its tale on a CEO with no relevant experience(in fact, worse than inexperienced - - he led his previous company to bankruptcy), an engineering narrative without employing a single engineer, a dependency on a money-grubbing contractor (Byle's Valkor) that failed to deliver on a single promise.... And yet, TOM got away with it for years.
Still, investors in AIM companies would do well to spend a few minutes researching the leadership before investing their hard-earned cash.
Posted at 25/4/2024 15:25 by 1dutchman
Still, without Byle leading JP by the nose, it is assured that TOM has absolutely no strategy. JP made a go of it for so long simply by aping Byle’s lies. JP didn’t even have to understand what he was saying. It probably helped that the Chairman and the Board also had no operational experience in the industry, as they wouldn’t have even known the right questions to ask. But they surely would have known their ‘gig was up’ when Byle broke it off with JP. When was that, and how long have investors continued to be milked since the Board became aware of the split? Given the reliance TOM had on Valkor, surely this should have been announced to shareholders?
Posted at 25/4/2024 14:51 by lopodop
1Dutchman
It seems Byle and JP have fallen out.How on earth can TOM move forward with no cash to speak of and no business relationship or business.
On the other hand look at Groat’s remuneration and that of JP - surely the principal investors must be factoring this into their sums - why?
Posted at 05/4/2024 17:34 by 1dutchman
Diddy - it's not just one week that has been wasted. It is several years and millions of shareholder's pounds that have been wasted. And it was all so predictable, as you and several others on this thread have expounded over the years. The litany of issues is long, but it starts with a Board and CEO who collectively have no experience in operating an oil company - - or a sand company, if it pleases Goulding. Would you hire a plumber to fix your car? A roofer to wire your house? Of course not. But both the Board and most investors deemed it ok to hire a caterer to build their oil company. And to keep him on, even when the results were nil. Kudos to Potter, I suppose, for he has got away with it now for over six(!) years, pocketing over a million pounds for having produced absolutely nothing. One way or another, the end is nigh, but I do hope that the Board is suitably called out for their ineptitude and profligacy and blocked from future Board roles. The AIM Regulation should also review what has gone on here; there are supposed to be safeguards in place so that AIM companies don't mislead investors in this way.
Posted at 07/2/2024 11:21 by 1dutchman
TOM could be a case study for the psychology of retail investors. Despite all the evidence that there is no value in the business (and no plans to create value), long term investors are still unwilling to sell. Misplaced loyalty or simply disbelief that a share price that has dropped this far can drop even further?
Posted at 23/1/2024 13:33 by goulding1215
LOL. I see that the Diddyman still selling crooked policies out ofHorsham. Fenderbender still posting rubbish after 20 years. He must be stupid, because only a stupid moron (is that an oxymoron?) would continue a journey to nowhere. Keep going guys and show everyone how gormlous you both are feeding rubbish on here giving posters a laugh. Don’t forget the investors a laugh, and in danger of being sued by thecFCA for passing false information to investors, which, of course, is a criminal offence. The stupidity of your lifes is only surpassed by Russian tank drivers. I wish I could say good luck to you pair of dopes, but you will never learn as is obvious, from your perpetual spewing of rubbish.
Posted at 09/1/2024 15:10 by 1dutchman
It still boggles my mind that anyone could have felt good about investing in an oil company with no actual oil and gas expertise in the management or on the board. OK, I guess for long-term investors this may have morphed over time, but for anyone putting money into this in the last three years, I am am inclined toward the view that those investors are now reaping what they sowed.
Posted at 16/10/2023 15:48 by the diddymen
By way of reflection on last week's charity shop RNS you can see how the discussion might have developed between the investor (RNS shortly) and TOM.

It would indicate that despite the Board's confidence in the going concern section of the last Financial Statements, TOM cannot rely on institutions to raise any more funds.

On that basis the next port of call for this fund raise was existing investors. Very sensible.

TOM advises the investor that the company is unable to raise any more cash on the markets and that the CORT funding is not yet in place. For the investor he/she is faced with the reality that their investment is worthless, unless of course they intervene.

The discussion then develops to establish how much time TOM need to deliver the funding. The £100k will reflect the cash burn for that time. As for the price of 0.008p, it does not really make any difference. The investor cannot be accused of putting him/herself at a preference, if the CORT finance is delivered everyone will be happy and £100k is small beer, and/or there is just an outside chance that the gamblers thread will pile in on the 'signal content' and lift the price above 0.008p.

A word of caution to the gamblers - that looks like the last call to me. No CORT financing and that is it. No more three years of strategic flip-flopping and frisking shareholders. The end game is close. Nothing to suggest that the company will not continue but it will be with new risk capital.

On another topic any other MIAs detected recently?
Posted at 06/6/2023 20:42 by lopodop
TD
Mr Campbell the former senior partner of PKF Littlejohn would never have allowed a report to be issued on TOM's accounts, moreover he would have asserted to GROAT that TOM had no business - it was simply a costly expense operation largely to support excessive directors costs - all funded by investors who were mislead into thinking that TOM was a business, not a narrative set up.
Anyway GROAT is fortunate in having a bunch of simple, naive and trusting investors who have been groomed into accepting whatever TOM threw at them.
Interesting to see how this plays out - most investors will accept the script and few if any will challenge the Board out of embarrassment - the dear auditors who followed BDO .walked right into a NONSENSE scenario. So here is the ludicrous situation, Groat Potter etc walk away with investors' cash leaving PKF Littlejohns to be pilloried by the regulators.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock