Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[rodinswan2] 22/12/2016 18:25

Not me Poco, I lose the will to live whenever I see one of his or Cut's posts.

And Oilman, sweetie, I didn't introduce myself to you at the AGM. Know why?

That's right. Didn't want to. I'd rather cover myself in sausage meat and stuff a chestnut up my @rse. (With apologies to the ladies present)

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 18:21

I did, good points raised.


Much more interesting than reading you projecting your incest fantasies so you can read them over and over again. Done well here haven't you, lol,lol,lol



pocopicu22 Dec '16 - 18:15 - 530646 of 530646 1 0
Blimey. Is anybody else going to bother to read Bitter Joseph's incoherent ramble? If so, please provide a precis. I would hate to miss out on the pearls of wisdom.

[joseki] 22/12/2016 18:20

The answers were in the Muppets Munch

[pocopicu] 22/12/2016 18:15

Blimey. Is anybody else going to bother to read Bitter Joseph's incoherent ramble? If so, please provide a precis. I would hate to miss out on the pearls of wisdom.

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 18:07

From what I can see a lot of it is based on `he said, she said` (some of it years ago) Breaking down sentences and taking every word literally which isn't much basis for any complaint. But a complaint is lodged and thats fair enough,anyone is entitled to do that.

I dont filter anyone 1712, and yes you can see this under one of your numerous avatars

[1712notout] 22/12/2016 17:59

1712notout22 Dec '16 - 17:51 - 530640 of 530642 0 0 Edit
Like buses 😇😇😇😇8519;🐩Ԁ41;🐩🐩;
--/////


Oilman6322 Dec '16 - 17:35 - 530636 of 530639 1 0 (Filtered)

Fake Taxi22 Dec '16 - 17:42 - 530637 of 530639 2 0 (Filtered)

Fake Taxi22 Dec '16 - 17:43 - 530638 of 530639 2 0 (Filtered)

Fake Taxi22 Dec '16 - 17:46 - 530639 of 530639 1 0 (Filtered)
Oilman6322 Dec '16 - 17:54 - 530641 of 530642 0 0 (Filtered)


They just can't stop
😊😊😊😊8522;😊

[1712notout] 22/12/2016 17:59

Edit
WR
They are organised criminal con artists
Who aren't worth the effort to engage
As it's their ralson d'être and why they here
Aside from the headcases
(I know there's a large Venn overlap 😊)
Hence the filter handy😇ԅ19;😇😇;

You'll note their key characteristic
They never filter me bob you etc
IE anybody positive the company / assets👍€077;👍㈇7;

[oilman63] 22/12/2016 17:54

Fake

It's my understanding that the FCA are not taking Bob seriously.

Send a thousand emails and makes a nuisance of yourself and people ignore you.

Anyway Bob what happened to the police and operation Blue Tick or has it all boiled down to just reporting people to ADVFN ???

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 17:46

You have nothing,give us all a motive please under criminal or company law. Im sure the FCA is inundated daily with information regards many companies, big deal, you have taken that avenue but always seem to be suggesting that it goes beyond that.



You raised the question:

'why haven't you brought an action against any of the directors, past and/or present?'

perhaps you would explain to us the basis in company law under which shareholders can take action against individual directors?
FCA is aware of a number of issues concerning GKP including the concealment of information. I would have thought that you, apparently being some sort of legal person already would be aware

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 17:43

Again, whats the motive????


WildRider722 Dec '16 - 17:15 - 530634 of 530637 1 2
lol faketaxi #530627

'You are claiming it has been done under the noses of 35,000 shareholders and the likes of M&G, right?'

=> the very same M&G that brought 4 directors on the board to have three of them hitting the revolving door.... and vanished without a trace
all part of the Shenanigans it seems
also what does it matter 35,000? what do big numbers have anything to do with what is true?

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 17:42

All makes sense now, its all a big concealment with no motive, thats what your saying now. Common sense tells me that statement makes no sense at all, its either done for fraud or some illegality unless you can give us all another reason.



oil_investor22 Dec '16 - 15:02 - 530628 of 530636 2 3
Oh dear.

I have not alleged fraud at all. You are just making it up.

The FCA have details of various matters involving Anastasia Vvedenskaya and the concealment of information. Quite where it will all lead is anyone's guess.

[1712notout] 22/12/2016 17:30

WR
They are organised criminal con artists
Who aren't worth the effort to engage
As it's their ralson d'être and why they here
Aside from the headcases
(I know there's a large Venn overlap 😊)
Hence the filter handy😇ԅ19;😇😇;

You'll note their key characteristic
They never filter me bob you etc
IE anybody positive the company / assets👍€077;👍㈇7;

[wildrider7] 22/12/2016 17:15

lol faketaxi #530627

'You are claiming it has been done under the noses of 35,000 shareholders and the likes of M&G, right?'

=> the very same M&G that brought 4 directors on the board to have three of them hitting the revolving door.... and vanished without a trace
all part of the Shenanigans it seems
also what does it matter 35,000? what do big numbers have anything to do with what is true?

[wildrider7] 22/12/2016 16:55

Lardner,

faketaxi jumps into conclusions in order to refute whatever it is that I have to say. like many on here,
So does Joseki, Oilman, Hearts ... a whole bunch of them actually.
the GKP boards are infested with non investors that operate pretty much the same way day in day out pretty much 24/7. To quote LJ Clarke 'why are you here'?

We (I mean long term investors) have indeed unearthed a lot of evidence, contradictions, conflicting info, concealment and also downright lies and other untruths . The case for the directors is weak imo. There is too much in the public domain in electronic form

when JF started he used to call Shaikan a 'World Class Discovery' and also 'Major Commercial Discovery' (these are actual quotes).
I have just checked the company wesbsite and i see 2 prominent references by the company to Shaikan being a 'World Class Discovery'.
you see some of the tracks are still warm!
more recently JF in his RNSes referred to it as a 'Major Commercial Discovery'
has he forgotten what is on the company website? Why does he simultaneously use different descriptions. why in one place that it is 'World Class' and then in an otherplace just call it 'Major Commercial Discovery'
does it depend upon his mood? in the whim of the moment or was just it drafted for him to push? Isn't it the case that there should be consistency in what is said about this key asset.
JS described Shaikan in a formal presentation as a 'Super Giant', and JS used that description when the OIP for Shaikan was significantly lower than it is today.

'Big fields get bigger' JG was telling us, Except when it happens to be a GKP's managed asset. Were they all misleading or what?
in which case it resembles a lucky dip where it's the luck of the draw what description of Shaikan you happen to pull out of a hat


You raised the question:

'why haven't you brought an action against any of the directors, past and/or present?'

perhaps you would explain to us the basis in company law under which shareholders can take action against individual directors?
FCA is aware of a number of issues concerning GKP including the concealment of information. I would have thought that you, apparently being some sort of legal person already would be aware

[hearts1] 22/12/2016 16:43

I thought your LSE therapist told you not to post on public forums?Maybe he could also help David with his issues with violence to women?

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 15:04

MASSIVE CLIMBDOWN

Sleep well.

[oil_investor] 22/12/2016 15:02

Oh dear.

I have not alleged fraud at all. You are just making it up.

The FCA have details of various matters involving Anastasia Vvedenskaya and the concealment of information. Quite where it will all lead is anyone's guess.

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 14:59

So now its untruths, uh, thats a bit of a climb down from outright fraud. Untruths in the market usually tend to be exaggerations by directors, timelines that aren`t met etc, the list is endless. You are alleging a lot more than that, or at least you have been alleging a lot more.


Quite rightly if you believe there is wrongdoing and fraud which you allege you have gone to the FCA, theres no "oh dear" about it.

As I said you have proven nothing, lets see what the FCA say shall we, then you can show us all its proven to be wrongdoing if you are right.

[oil_investor] 22/12/2016 14:45

Oh dear.

The issue of the concealment of the 13 March 2014 CPR webcast - and the untruths told by certain persons at GKP about that concealment - are with the FCA.

That webcast was announced in RNS and it therefore forms part of the RNS. One might as well argue that black is white as to claim that nothing has been concealed. The concealment is real, it is proved, and untruths have been told by certain persons at GKP about that concealment. There are documents which prove that untruths have been told.

[fake taxi] 22/12/2016 14:42

Nothing you have said is proven.

You are claiming fraud, right? You are claiming certain individuals have acted fraudulently, right? You are claiming it has been done under the noses of 35,000 shareholders and the likes of M&G, right?.... No you wont say it, because you cant prove it at all. Its just a small group, yourself and a few others spamming bulletin boards, it comes to no more than that.

I am claiming that its only a small group of people, who have not been subject to the data room that are saying there is anything wrong, ie yourselves. No one else anywhere has made any claims of cover ups, fraud wrong doing etc, have they?

It takes a jury of 12 to convict or exonerate, 18 were in the data room, not yourselves, common sense is telling us this is not worth anywhere near the outrageous claims being made here, and that by saying nothing, its clear none of them felt anything was being hidden from them or was untoward.

You keep enjoying your sleepless nights.