ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

BLZ Emblaze LD (DI)

31.00
0.00 (0.00%)
10 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Emblaze LD (DI) LSE:BLZ London Ordinary Share IL0010830219 ORD NIS0.01 (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 31.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Emblaze LD (DI) Share Discussion Threads

Showing 37076 to 37100 of 37225 messages
Chat Pages: 1489  1488  1487  1486  1485  1484  1483  1482  1481  1480  1479  1478  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
12/7/2014
07:04
Apple won. "The 10-person jury unanimously found that Apple hadn't induced any of the accused companies to infringe, but refused Apple's bid to invalidate Emblaze's patent. Apple argued at trial that the invention was obvious and anticipated by prior art."

hxxp://www.law360.com/articles/556297/jury-says-apple-didn-t-infringe-emblaze-video-stream-ipa

mertles
11/7/2014
10:31
emblaze had a patented technology that apple used illegally, they cant prove they didnt know about emblaze and even if they could its still illegal to infringe a patent , thats what a patent is for to ensure what you have invented is beneficial to you, emblaze should win but they probably wont, its crazy having a jury decide such matters, it should be a team of independant experts, even with them in charge its hard to see them going against a goliath like apple
landsker
11/7/2014
09:30
Not overly hopeful on the case (but will know soon). At least once it's out the way we might finally relist (despite being told the two are not interlinked it makes sense to wait a few days for the result). My valuation has nothing in it for the case. Not sure many juries would even understand the instructions let alone the case!
waterloo01
10/7/2014
15:21
Are the Jury now out ?
hotfinance14
10/7/2014
14:57
9 July 2014
Emblaze v Apple

Judge Grewal

Proposed final Jury Instructions

colinhy
10/7/2014
14:55
9 July 2014
Emblaze v Apple

Judge Grewal


Proposed verdict form

colinhy
09/7/2014
09:34
Might be academic.

Law360, San Francisco (July 08, 2014, 8:25 PM ET) -- Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge on Tuesday to grant it a midtrial win in Emblaze Ltd.'s case accusing the iPhone and iPad of infringing a video live-streaming patent, arguing that Emblaze failed to prove Apple induced media companies to infringe or that Apple owes $511 million in damages.

Apple lodged the motion for judgment as a matter of law after Emblaze rested its case-in-chief before the jury Monday, arguing that the Israeli company's evidence didn't prove that the accused Apple mobile devices, Apple TVs...

waterloo01
08/7/2014
18:32
we would probably get a 30p rise on the share price, if we do manage to get a bite out of the apple
landsker
08/7/2014
15:13
So IF we win the MONEY goes to everyone BUT the shareholders

WAY TO GO

moneyman18
08/7/2014
10:48
Landsker almost makes me wish we lose!

However worth remembering that IF they win, they will not only get royalties going forward but will in quick order settle with Microsoft et al so the final amount will be a lot higher regardless

waterloo01
08/7/2014
10:16
and a lot of the rest would go to naftali shani
landsker
08/7/2014
08:37
Does it matter when it is, most of it will go in legal fees.
ohwhat
08/7/2014
07:21
Ok so even if we win Apple will appeal so another 18 months before any announcement , totally Unfair to Emblaze. We are being held to ransom by Apple the robbers.So January 2016 before this farce ends...
ragewarrior
04/7/2014
08:59
I now own shares in "B.S.D. Group Limited"That was a quick name change...
ragewarrior
04/7/2014
02:09
Thanks waterloo.
mertles
03/7/2014
22:29
So we can feel safe with our investments ?
moneyman18
03/7/2014
19:17
Nice one Waterloo...
ragewarrior
03/7/2014
17:24
Would you rather pay fees dating back 5 years?
waterloo01
03/7/2014
17:17
That's a big payout to the lawyers if we win.
hotfinance14
03/7/2014
16:47
many thanks waterloo,
cheeky13
03/7/2014
14:58
Working name "benefit success development"? No idea where that came from but clean break from BLZ. UKLA going forward, all be it slowly, but once approval will relist (next 2-4 weeks?). No major issues raised by UKLA.

Only Eyal at meeting (to some consternation) and no formal presentation. Details on future will be in prospectus when approved but next 'buy' might not be food related. Happy with Willi, think they got a great deal and is undervalued at present. Looking for long term, well managed companies that will deliver solid growth and dividends. (Yes they do know what these are!)

Apple case soon (as reported here) and could be massive (or not depending on outcome and jury). If win, pushed to deliver a special divi. patent runs till 2029. Done on no win no fee (so 25% of any win to lawyers)

waterloo01
03/7/2014
14:46
Further to changes in the management, business strategy and operations of the Company, it is proposed to change the Company's name to "B.S.D Group Ltd."
colinhy
03/7/2014
13:27
I guess so ;-)

looks like a name change coming.... any suggestions... let me start the ball rolling....

Kosher Cola
Blazing Willi

fatoomch
03/7/2014
12:50
Did anyone go to the AGM.
cheeky13
02/7/2014
07:52
Come on Apple pay up....
ragewarrior
Chat Pages: 1489  1488  1487  1486  1485  1484  1483  1482  1481  1480  1479  1478  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock