ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

CBI China Bio

13.50
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
China Bio LSE:CBI London Ordinary Share VGG211791097 ORD USD0.01 (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 13.50 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

China Biodiesel Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1476 to 1498 of 1550 messages
Chat Pages: 62  61  60  59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
16/6/2010
10:47
Tender closes 25 June, but the company delists in mid-July. What happens in between? Will the share price bomb? If anyone wants to hold on to their stock, there might be a buying opportunity. Presumably stock in play will be limited though, confined to people who missed deadlines etc.
tim00
16/6/2010
10:21
i phoned around the MMs yesterday and the best i could get for my line of stock was 14.5 so not sure whats going on here
aim11
16/6/2010
08:05
yes, I think so.
tim00
15/6/2010
22:40
two options:
Do not tender(default): XXX
Tender offer: XXX

so if I would like to take the offer, I should put number of shares after the option of "tender offer"?

qipincha
15/6/2010
22:09
hi guys, I got email regarding tender offer from dealer, how about you?
qipincha
15/6/2010
10:15
even now MM's are trying to rip off the small PI- bid now at 14.5 and flip into the tender at 16.5. complete disgrace.
aim11
15/6/2010
09:38
yep agreed re wcc. A great long-term play. Notice there are CBI sellers! I'd sell at 16p to invest elsewhere, but not under 15!
tim00
15/6/2010
09:31
tim00 - imho v few people are aware of the wcc story, most of the ones in it a few months ago were just buying for the hk list and didn't have much of a clue about eps or even what the strategy of the biz was etc etc. that's another reason its languishing down where it is, not many understand it'll do 120p this yr (and imho it'll be closer to 135-140p).
aim11
15/6/2010
05:53
£1.20 is the estimated eps for 2010.
tim00
14/6/2010
22:43
great! thanks tim.

all my stocks are doing well today!

I read a few RNS of WCC, but cann't find the £1.2profit per share. Maybe I missed some RNS. thought was about 50p by the end of 2009?

qipincha
13/6/2010
23:22
qip, wcc is making about £1.20 earnings per share this year, giving a current p/e of 4. Competitors trade on p/e ratios of over 10, implying the share price should more than double. Results for H1 will be announced early September. The company has delayed its move to the HK exchange, hence the fallback.
tim00
13/6/2010
21:20
tim, thanks to point it out
I thought the company is under valued.
so why wcc in August?
I watched it a while, saw it rocket up and then fall back, not sure what it is doing now

qipincha
12/6/2010
21:44
Cornishman

Another way to do it might be to decide how many shares you want to keep, get your nominee to issue you a certificate for that many, and then tender the remainder in your nominee account. Even though it's not your entire holding, I don't see how they could refuse (or even know about it).

I don't know if there would be time to do this. If you have a wife you could transfer some to her, perhaps.

zangdook
12/6/2010
15:37
qip, re: PMHL, forget the property angle, the reason to buy is that the company has over £50 mn allocated to buy back shares in order to close the gap to NAV (somewhere north of £3). Whatever value you put on the property assets, it doesn't alter the fact that the company's share purchases will force the share price substantially higher, probably during July. The majority shareholder already owns 60% of the shares, so the supply will be limited, but the new demand (via buybacks) will be overwhelming.
tim00
12/6/2010
14:19
Thanks for the replies all.

As a couple of posters have pointed out, the tender offer is on an all-or-nothing basis with regard to existing shareholdings, but I would see no reason (before the record date) why one could not reduce a shareholding in the market to a level that one would be comfortable keeping in the unlisted company (perhaps reclaiming the original investment cost), declining the offer and then withdrawing the remaining shares from nominee into certificated form.

The downside of that would be that one would have to accept a lower price, miss the dividend and incur higher charges than simply accepting the offer would involve.

I'm going to dwell on this a little longer I think. I don't want to maintain an unlisted shareholding in a company where minority shareholders are not wanted or seen as a nuisance (past experience has taught me this can be a recipe for disaster), but if the board were happy to keep a few small shareholders around then this appears to me to be an interesting company in a potentially highly lucrative area.

Another poster suggests different China plays; I already have China Shoto & Griffin Mining and have looked at WCC more than once. The reason I would be interested in maintaining a holding here is the green energy aspect and what I perceive to be an extremely conservatively managed company in terms of its balance-sheet.

The main downside, as others have pointed out, is that obviously there is no guaranteed way for crystalizing value from the remaining shareholding. If I recall correctly the majority shareholder has tended to decline his own right to claim dividends, whilst allowing other shareholders to be paid. I really value this kind of behaviour, but I wonder if a dividend is likely to be maintained once the holding is de-listed? I'd guess not and then obviously there is the issue of how one would eventually exit the holding if that were desired. At that stage, I guess one would be dependent on a director or other interested party within the company buying the shares but I agree their desire to take-out very small holdings might well be limited.

If I did not already have a holding here I would be buying at these levels and so it's a bit disappointing to be effectively forcibly ejected. The same thing happened with Indian Films Co. but I wasn't so keen on the business there model there.

I guess the honourable thing to do is to take the profits, say thanks, let the majority shareholder have his company back and wish him well.

It's a real shame though...

Thanks again to all who replied.

Regards,

TC

thecornishman2
12/6/2010
12:34
tim, I have briefly look at the PMHL, not sure about their move to enter property business. could be dangerous to get into property market at the moment
qipincha
12/6/2010
11:06
TaurusTheBear - 12 Jun'10 - 01:37 - 1450 of 1453

Question is, how you actually "tender"!?
------------------------------------------

There's some paperwork here

zangdook
12/6/2010
08:48
that's impressive Mike. I hold 4% of the outstanding shares. The question is, if we were all buying so many (I know you use spread bets but presumably the counterparty has matched positions), how come the share price didn't rise? I guess we had IIs selling out. The share price is very disappointing, but with liquidity so poor a positive is that it presents an exit, when none existed. I doubt there is much that can be done, but good luck!
tim00
12/6/2010
08:11
Totally agree that small shareholders are being royally shafted.I would guess we are being taken out on a pe of less than 3.Speaking for about 33% of the outstanding shares I intend to see if anything can be done.The Worldspreads stake is mine and I know where another 1.2m are.
mikeja
12/6/2010
06:50
Personally I think a Chinese relist would be a long time away, AIM is not that burdensome, nor expensive. Companies the size of CBI are really too small to be quoted. The hope must have been that without the global recession, CBI's share price would have been on an upward trend rather than the opposite, and they could have used AIM to raise further funds to expand more rapidly. (They've mentioned other provinces now have minimum useage of biodiesel for example.) I agree the most likely opportunity to sell would be to a Director, Ye or Gloria He, but would Ye bother to buy shares from a tiny holder and if he did, would he give you fair value? He would have a massive information advantage over the seller, and might offer you 16.5p. WCC and PMHL are excellent opportunities at the moment. One strategy is to sell CBI at close to 16p in the market by late June, buy PMHL then sell PMHL late July and invest in WCC. Excellent chance of more than doubling your money on a three month horizon.
tim00
12/6/2010
01:37
Question is, how you actually "tender"!?

As I see it, it's just an MM situation. 16p bid was going today. Post-divi, that would seem a good price to me. :0)

taurusthebear
11/6/2010
21:18
imho and having said that, there are other equally good opportunities out there without this hassle of having to hope they relist somewhere else eventually. i will be tendering mine at 16.5 and moving the money into something like wcc on 3.5x which i expect will get the move to asia in h2 and at least keep a listing, albeit in hk - not a prob for me.
aim11
11/6/2010
21:14
I thought about it. I might be tempted if it were possible to tender some and keep some, even though I only have a small holding, but they won't allow it and as it happens it's come along just as I was trying to find a way to raise a little cash.

Having said that, it's possible that Mr Ye would always be glad to mop up anyone who held out, and eventually, once you've left AIM and its low valuation behind, perhaps he'd be willing to pay a better price?

zangdook
Chat Pages: 62  61  60  59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock