Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Belhaven Grp. LSE:BHG London Ordinary Share GB0000905397 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p - - - - - - - - -
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Unknown - - - - 0.00

Belhaven Grp. Share Discussion Threads

Showing 301 to 314 of 325 messages
Chat Pages: 13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
26/10/2006
11:45
a friend of mine just nicked their chief brewer for his own brewery,
ivor bongo
04/10/2006
08:20
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
20:28
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
20:16
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
20:13
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
20:12
And the fantasists and deceivers cannot bring themselves to read this either; "The initial floor collapse occurred due to the aircraft impact damage and the resulting eccentric loading of the core columns." "CONCLUSIONS  An analysis of the energetics of the WTC collapse events has shown that the kinetic energy of the aircraft collisions and the subsequent gravitational energy released by the descending blocks of floors were quite sufficient to destroy the twin towers in the manner observed. The use of explosive devices in either of the two towers is not necessary to explain the collapse events and is considered to be highly unlikely.  The times calculated for the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2 show good agreement with the observed collapse times verifying the basic assumptions of the momentum transfer model used in the calculations.  The calculated times represent the minimum theoretical times of building collapse. If shorter times are to be physically achieved they must involve an unknown additional source of energy acting in a downward direction. Such a source of energy does not appear to have been involved in the collapse of the twin towers.  The kinetic energy of the collapse events was sufficient to crush the WTC floor concrete in both towers to particles 100 m in diameter, or smaller, which is consistent with the observed WTC debris particle size distribution.  From a consideration of the strength of the WTC columns, and the effective area of support they provided, it is demonstrated that the conditions necessary for the initial floor collapse were initiated by the aircraft impacts and made irrevocable by the subsequent eccentric loading of the core columns. The fires that were initiated by the jet fuel spilled within the towers certainly weakened steel in localized areas in the impact zones. However, it is suggested that the total collapse of both towers would have occurred even without the jet fuel fires. F.R. Greening greening@sympatico.ca Original version, (1.05): March 1, 2005 This version, (2.06): February 16, 2006 A proper scientific approach to the problems; (bhg will struggle with the whole document no doubt). http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf regards T..
tradx666
03/10/2006
20:10
http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/index.php?title=Controlled_demolition Pay particular attention to the section on 'free-fall'... soon it becomes very clear that the conspiracy nutters are also consummate liars and deceivers. All they are doing is working hard to obscure the real truth, as opposed to their fantasist world derived from a simple hatred of Americans and the US. regards T..
tradx666
03/10/2006
19:42
Slipping away taxi, tut tut How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. To compound the problem. Not only do we have that massively strong structure collapsing at freefall speed implying no resistance, we have complete pulverisation of the buildings and contents which would mean MASSIVE resistance. How can these contradictions be resolved?
bhg
03/10/2006
18:59
joe moon, and your problem is? Tell it to the widows and relatives of the victims or the 50% Americans that want to know or all the dead Iraqis and Afghanis as a result of it. Some think about things other than shags - bomfins your man.
bhg
03/10/2006
18:52
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
18:28
Oh look taxi, loonies aplenty. No answers though eh. Here taxi, if ANYONE can answer the questions below I will donate to your favourite loony bin - the one you felt best in perhaps? How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. To compound the problem. Not only do we have that massively strong structure collapsing at freefall speed implying no resistance, we have complete pulverisation of the buildings and contents which would mean MASSIVE resistance. How can these contradictions be resolved?
bhg
03/10/2006
18:14
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
03/10/2006
17:37
bhg, LOL!! Keep your head in the sand...you really are getting desperate eh? Never mind, you only have to try and keep this nonsense up for the rest of your 'life'... Got any money yet? regards T..
tradx666
03/10/2006
17:29
ATTA boy taxi, you have attracted a genuine loony to help keep it to the top. No answers though eh. Here taxi, if ANYONE can answer the questions below I will donate to your favourite loony bin - the one you felt best in perhaps? How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. To compound the problem. Not only do we have that massively strong structure collapsing at freefall speed implying no resistance, we have complete pulverisation of the buildings and contents which would mean MASSIVE resistance. How can these contradictions be resolved?
bhg
Chat Pages: 13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:41 V: D:20161205 04:30:45