We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belhaven Grp. | LSE:BHG | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000905397 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | - | 0.00 | - |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/10/2006 17:28 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
03/10/2006 17:20 | ATTA boy taxi, keep it to the top - a useful idiot indeed. Here taxi, if ANYONE can answer the questions below I will donate to your favourite loony bin - the one you felt best in perhaps? How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. To compound the problem. Not only do we have that massively strong structure collapsing at freefall speed implying no resistance, we have complete pulverisation of the buildings and contents which would mean MASSIVE resistance. How can these contradictions be resolved? | bhg | |
03/10/2006 17:12 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
03/10/2006 17:05 | Here taxi, if ANYONE can answer the questions below I will donate to your favourite loony bin - the one you felt best in perhaps? How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. To compound the problem. Not only do we have that massively strong structure collapsing at freefall speed implying no resistance, we have complete pulverisation of the buildings and contents which would mean MASSIVE resistance. How can these contradictions be resolved? | bhg | |
03/10/2006 17:00 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
03/10/2006 08:49 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
03/10/2006 08:41 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
02/10/2006 22:17 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
02/10/2006 20:44 | taxi, here was me thinking you were just another idiot, but no, you are a useful idiot. Keep it to the top, I'll help you out. This is probably the best documentary to date that leaves no doubt that the WTC buildings were brought down by some form of controlled demolition. Anyone with a genuine interest can see for themselves the overwhelming evidence that has led to such high numbers globally who now know the official conspiracy theory is worthy only of ridicule. | bhg | |
02/10/2006 20:39 | How can a building (WTC) collapse at freefall speed or even a speed approaching freefall which implies no resistance when it is made of massively strong steel collumns? For this to happen it would mean these hundreds of masively strong collumns gave way SIMALTANEOUSLY - a veritable miracle. | bhg | |
02/10/2006 20:32 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
02/10/2006 18:44 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
02/10/2006 18:34 | removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
11/10/2005 09:27 | Just sold my shares for 625.75. Can't see any reason to hold onto them now. Might have a little punt on partypoker for a laugh - although the chart isn't looking to great, the company certainly is making good profits. Probably not a company to buy into if you aren't a 100% gambler. | rmillaree | |
10/10/2005 15:04 | Didn't see the bid at 630, else I would have sold the few I have left. Why on earth would anyone want to buy any now, and for 636!! | domtheone | |
16/9/2005 11:58 | Well, there it is. All ending quietly. Little Belhaven shuffles meekly into the arms of capacious (rapacious?) Greene King. There would have been a strong independent future but for the Scottish smoking ban. Mustn't grumble, made a few quid out of it. Where next for me? Giving it some thought. | ed 123 | |
12/9/2005 23:24 | May have been a case of cricket interference, but price dropped to 607/610 at one point As you say, looked stronger at the close. See what tomorrow brings. | ed 123 | |
12/9/2005 17:14 | Surely just hopes fading for a counterbid - settling at the 625 level now. | huttonr | |
12/9/2005 16:31 | SP collapsing leading into the close today. Expectations that bid will fail? What a change from hopes of a counterbid at 660p-ish. Some holders will get a shock when they check the price after a day at work. It's not over yet, all the same. | ed 123 | |
09/9/2005 16:51 | Nope, not trying for any loan notes, don't look attractive to me. You could check your client conditions with iDealing and Halifax. What does their small print actually say about such situations? | ed 123 |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions