We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xlmedia Plc | LSE:XLM | London | Ordinary Share | JE00BH6XDL31 | ORD USD0.000001 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.25 | -1.89% | 13.00 | 12.50 | 13.50 | 13.25 | 13.00 | 13.25 | 169,755 | 11:54:04 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advertising, Nec | 73.74M | -9.44M | -0.0359 | -3.62 | 34.14M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
09/11/2017 14:54 | Fine igoe but where is the video? | pshevlin | |
09/11/2017 14:38 | Heres another link via his twitter site, XlM one of his top buys/ tips at the moment. | igoe104 | |
09/11/2017 14:31 | Thanks Panic Investor. | rhubarbcrumble | |
09/11/2017 13:59 | Great top up opportunity very soon. Just waiting ready to go ? | esther1975 | |
09/11/2017 13:50 | Replace xx with tt | panic investor | |
09/11/2017 13:43 | igoe104. My computer will not access the site you have mentioned. sounds interesting. May I ask if the URL is correct? | rhubarbcrumble | |
09/11/2017 12:56 | Video - "no real risks with XLMedia - world leaders - resourceful and creative" | panic investor | |
09/11/2017 12:15 | Well! Just guessing a 160p crinkley bottom, buy order in for 161. | alphapig | |
09/11/2017 12:00 | Latest chart channel wise - hTTps://mobile.twitt | panic investor | |
09/11/2017 10:57 | Fantastic interview with Leon Boros, talks about what a great company XLM is, and one of his top tips. | igoe104 | |
09/11/2017 10:50 | Lets hope it's the catapult and not the knicker elastic! | pshevlin | |
09/11/2017 10:37 | I tend to think of this action as pulling back on a catapult prior to letting go of the slingshot. If the soothsayers are correct we are heading for a Christmas Present price of say £2. So go with the flow | acamas | |
09/11/2017 09:49 | It would be encouraging if the share price stopped going down. | pshevlin | |
09/11/2017 09:28 | Test buy of T+20 for 35k offered at 162.35p, so looks like most of yesterday's and today's reported sells are actually buys ? Encouraging. | santangello | |
08/11/2017 15:01 | thanks busterdog, yes I meant $ of course. Looking at the last three years, the second half adj EBITDA has been an average 16% higher than the first half. I suspect this may just be reflective of natural growth rather than any Seasonality? Having achieved $23m in H1, I agree with busterdog that $45m must be a reasonable expectation, and it must be possible to achieve $50m+ if things go well and previous average 1H/2H split applies. | simso | |
08/11/2017 14:37 | Think your £ should be $, however got to be looking at adjusted EBITDA of $45m surely. | busterdog2 | |
08/11/2017 13:36 | Picking up garglebuster's point about performance, and whether the Brokers View is too prudent. The first problem is establishing what current expectations actually are! The last proper note I can find is Cenkos in August who said 13.4p for FY 17. I see the XLM Stocko page today puts consensus at 14p, so only a rounding difference from the August Cenkos note, implying their Forecast is still fairly current. Anybody know any different / more recent Market views? Cenkos fcst adj EBITDA in Aug was £39.1m v £34.6m last year...so an increase of £4.5m on LY. Given that the Interims on Sept 11 showed adj EBITDA of £22.9m which was +£5.8m (+30%) above last year, it implies a reduction of £1.3m v LY for the second half. Even in absolute terms, a Forecast of £39m when £23m has already been achieved in H1 looks very, very light/prudent. Given the curent momentum in the bsuiness, it is hard to believe the business profits could start going backwards. I wish I hadnt written this, as have convinced myself to buy even more! | simso | |
08/11/2017 12:32 | Sorry to be off topic but yeah... Barclays. I just checked the exact dates and it took 5 months for them to move just a couple of holdings. In 1917 I dare say the transfer would of been done in a few weeks with share certificates. And here we are in 2017....it beggers belief. Luckily for me my few holdings performed well in those months, with XLM doing the heavy lifting. Needless to say I have broken all business with Barclays, and will never use them for anything ever again. | morph7 | |
08/11/2017 12:19 | Totally unacceptable performance from Barclays. Things must be bad when Barclays make the extremely modest II look highly professional by comparison. | mount teide | |
08/11/2017 12:10 | Bloody useless as I said | panic investor | |
08/11/2017 12:08 | I've just received an email from my SIPP provider who have been constantly chasing Barclays. Barclays confirmed minutes ago that they can see my XLM dividend in my closed account. Will take 5 days to get it moved back to my provider and into my new share account. I'm guessing the other barclays accounts will see it very soon. | morph7 | |
08/11/2017 11:32 | Alphapig - unlikely. I am still waiting for the ones in my Sipp to be paid by Tilney Bestinvest. 8 days of phoning them and a snotty email have produced absolutely nothing. | the juggler | |
08/11/2017 11:08 | Any update on Barclays? ???? | alphapig | |
07/11/2017 21:56 | Am still trying to get my head around why forward eps projections are so low for xlm (relative to growth in previous years). I can see the affiliate model producing far higher revenues/profits than projected (albeit that this is not the only iron that xlm have in the fire). Bear in mind that a high proportion of punters do not burn out but continue to have a flutter, and those that do are being continuously replenished in any case. Also there is no downside if punters are successful under the affiliate model (unlike the hit that bookmakers can take when favorites do well). There is some evidence that some bookies are no longer taking on affiliates which may actually be an advantage to the likes of xlm going forward. The only thing that makes sense imho is that xlm/their brokers are under-promising and will over-deliver in due course. And that of course is a good reason for the directors to be filling their boots - which they are! | gargleblaster | |
07/11/2017 17:08 | Totally agree but Barclays are just corrupt and won't change - just look at the last 8 years of management | panic investor |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions