ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

WRN Worthington Group Plc

87.00
0.00 (0.00%)
21 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Worthington Group Plc LSE:WRN London Ordinary Share GB00B01YQ796 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 87.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Worthington Share Discussion Threads

Showing 40326 to 40331 of 54750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1614  1613  1612  1611  1610  1609  1608  1607  1606  1605  1604  1603  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/11/2018
11:32
David,

Fully agree with your views on RAP corporate governance and abiding by disclosure rules. A convenient change of auditor has no doubt helped with passing off the valuation of assets.

However if you are seeking a dual listing, is it not a good idea to comply with the basic disclosure rules for any market?

It is entirely possible that at some later date WHET and RAP will concoct something around the warrants which have officially expired.

sweet karolina
03/11/2018
08:17
SK - "WHET may not be subject to market disclosure rules, but RAP is."

I'm not sure how strict the SIX rules are. A whopping £4.7m investment in S(c/t)reamcast has appeared in the accounts, apparently as a result of £1.5m of prepaid advertising. That's nearly doubled the net assets. Did that (very material) event get announced at the time?

I'd read very little into the silence on the option expiry therefore, esp given how sloppy RAP are corporately (the vanishing CEO shares, inability to spell their major investment, etc etc).

davidkip
02/11/2018
18:48
ALS,

POCA has been applied to specific AB assets. It may be applied to the GSC shares in AB's name (I have my doubts whether he put up the money and is truly the beneficial owner). I see absolutely no reason why POCA would apply to WHET just because of AB.

Andy,

Without a liquid listing, which enables them to raise quite a bit of cash very soon, RAP will go bust; so of course RAP is "committed" to a dual listing. The issue is can they find an exchange that will have them and if so can they afford the prospectus, DD and listing costs? With no more of WHET's cash coming RAP's way, who else is going to be daft enough to provide the reddies needed for a company with an obviously flawed business model and assets which would seem to be massively overvalued, if indeed they exist at all?

sweet karolina
02/11/2018
18:21
PAP are still saying they are committed to a dual listing.


I guess they are looking for an exchange where there will be some punters, and news may create some liquidity.

andy
02/11/2018
18:20
I still think WHET simply can't due to AB's assets being frozen.
arthur_lame_stocks
02/11/2018
17:48
They're not the only ones keeping a low profile.
arthur_lame_stocks
Chat Pages: Latest  1614  1613  1612  1611  1610  1609  1608  1607  1606  1605  1604  1603  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock