
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worthington Group Plc | LSE:WRN | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01YQ796 | ORD 10P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 87.00 | GBX |
Worthington (WRN) Share Charts1 Year Worthington Chart |
|
1 Month Worthington Chart |
Intraday Worthington Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
10/11/2023 | 08:02 | Whats App | 2,455 |
02/11/2022 | 21:17 | The WRN litigation thread | 103 |
21/10/2022 | 08:24 | Worthington Group - Shell possibility | 826 |
08/2/2020 | 01:20 | looking for 7willt18 | 4 |
08/2/2020 | 01:18 | hoping for news of trading starting soon again | 20 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 23/5/2023 22:56 by spikeyj looks like LSE admin have re-enabled postings to the WRNchatboard. new posts from 13/5, after gap since oct ‘22. |
Posted at 31/3/2023 14:05 by spikeyj bbms, i understand that some brown envelopes were indeed sentout, at long last, but apparently there was some terrible mix-up so those brown envelopes ending up going through the letterboxes of the WRN 5 summoning them to appear in court themselves. oops. |
Posted at 25/3/2023 14:23 by filthylucre01 6 weeks since the pro wrn poster alluded to one of the Wrn 5 dying and still no confirmation of the news. A poster writing they’ve ‘just heard’ of a death amounts to nothing and just makes me more sceptical, if that’s possible. |
Posted at 04/3/2023 09:30 by arthur_lame_stocks Don't get me wrong David, but had I lost money in WRN and Whetstone you can bet your cotton socks I'd be wishing them ill. |
Posted at 04/3/2023 09:12 by filthylucre01 Unless the pro wrn poster states the name of the person that has allegedly died, I will find it extremely hard to believe. |
Posted at 10/2/2023 11:55 by filthylucre01 I recall SK mentioning a prelim court hearing for the alleged fraud committed by the WRN crew this March, can anyone confirm if that's correct? |
Posted at 25/1/2023 22:37 by spikeyj meanwhile, no sign of our dear old pal copperwindow93 sinceearly november ‘22, when he said he was going to see if the FCA could help him get his money back from all those massive life-changing losses on DVRG. … unclear just how sympathetic FCA would be to copper, since he had invested lots of money in DVRG thinking that he was getting info privately from a BoD member (which copper seemed to think gave him a sneaky advantage over other punters just relying on corporate RNSs). a bit off-topic for WRN, soz! … just passing the time of day while we wait for the trial to begin. (wonder if some plea-bargaining underway?) |
Posted at 23/11/2022 12:39 by sweet karolina2 The old adage you can't con an honest person does spring to mind. Also what the judge who sent AE down last time said:"Judge Denis Lloyd told Earley: ''When you deal with other people's money and public money, you must account for how you do it.'' The Judge added that he felt little sympathy for greedy investors who had given Earley their money." However there were a lot of ordinary decent people who bought their shares in Main Market (forget to mention Standard) Official List WRN in the normal ways PIs buy shares. Yes it looked too good to be true and indeed it was not true, but only some were tipped the wink to get out before suspension, whilst others were piling in to what they had been led to believe, through RNSs and other IR comms channels was going to be a multi £Bn global conglomerate (classic pump and dump). This was not a victimless crime and did not just impact the stupid and greedy. That is why there are laws to protect ordinary people against this sort of thing and why regulators exist to prosecute those who break them. The WRN 5 are being prosecuted because FCA have sufficient evidence to bring the charges, it has nothing at all to do with what anyone has posted or will post on a BB and those who try to insinuate that it does are clearly the real slimeballs. The trouble is it will be 10 years after the event by the time the verdict is in and nearly everyone will have forgotten the ordinary victims. However, in the morning and at the going down of the WRN 5, we will remember them. |
Posted at 19/11/2022 00:08 by sweet karolina2 Perhaps with all the talk about needing to be proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt it is worth reminding ourselves of just one of the many bits of evidence FCA have to show who was really running the scam at WRN:This one shows them attempting to move pensioners' assets so creditors (including HMRC) can't get them. That is what AE got struck off for at one of his many other failed companies. Couple of other familiar names there too, who are not among the famous 5. From: Doug Ware > Date: 11 January 2013 at 13:40 Subject: RE: Draft RNS To: Aidan Earley > Hi Aidan, Such good news about Karen, you both must be so relieved. Attached is RNS with my comments, we need a plan as to when the litigation against Rangers International will be commenced & made public. Also attached is an updated Briefing note which I sent to Craig yesterday. With regard to the security, we all understand that this is a safety net for the investors in case WRN is forced into insolvency by the Pension Trustee or the Pension Regulator/PPF not accepting a deal. There is no safety net for me. In the event that the land in Keighley and the shares in Trimmings by design come under our control we need to agree in advance the plan for managing these assets. I suggest that the assets are placed in an SPV. I will secure the planning application & manage the TBD shareholding. After the cash outstanding has been repaid from the sale of the land with planning permission, and possibly the TBD shares to the other shareholders, I suggest that the remaining proceeds are split in the following way: 32% to each of AE, CW & DW 4% to be given to John Taylor as he will be the "man on the ground" doing all the leg work on an unpaid basis. I hope that you & Craig can agree to this & raise the necessary cash next week to secure the position. Is Richard Beresford on board? If so I suggest you get him to draw up the required security documentation for filing at Companies House & the Land Registry, remember we need to be able to control the assets in an insolvency situation. Warm regards, Doug From: Aidan Earley [mailto: aidanearley@blueyond Sent: 08 January 2013 22:26 To: dougware Subject: RE: Draft RNS Wrong one - correct attached From: Aidan Earley [ mailto:aidanearley@b Sent: 08 January 2013 22:21 To: dougware Subject: Draft RNS A first attempt |
Posted at 18/11/2022 18:36 by spikeyj “The shame for the wives and the children.”saracen, ? yes perhaps, but in some cases these things could be more about shared guilt rather than shame? - particularly in certain kinds of fraud situations where folk wanted to keep things in the family, so to speak. the FCA will be well aware who WRN’s ‘Harriet’ accused. - ? but what did she actually understand at the time about the nature of WRN? … hopefully she will be asked to give evidence on oath in court. (that might help clarity matters.) |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |