![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0675 | 0.065 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.065 | 0.07 | 43,055,151 | 16:35:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.07 | 892.9k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/6/2021 13:39 | Always best to do ones own write up: Charting Graphene’s Progress By John Tingay, Paragraf 06.20.2021 0 Share Post Graphene presents an attractive value proposition to nearly every possible engineering discipline, from heavy duty coatings through to water filtration mechanisms. However, the global semiconductor business, now worth close to half a trillion dollars a year, is where this unique material is likely to be most impactful. In this article we look at what graphene’s implications could be, both in the short term and much further ahead, for this huge global industry. Graphene is comprised of an atom-thick arrangement of carbon atoms that are held together by ultra-strong nuclear bonds., This material offers very high electron mobility, the speed at which electrons move through the material when a voltage is applied. Industry analysts at McKinsey estimate that by 2030 the annual market for graphene-based semiconductors will have reached approximately $70 billion. There is the prospect of digital integrated circuits (ICs), power discretes, displays and optical transceivers, plus various forms of next generation sensor devices all benefiting from its inclusion. ADVERTISING Graphene is a molecular network of hexagons connected together. Using graphene, the operational frequencies at which processors run could be heightened and the durability of the solid-state drives used in data storage extended. It will be possible to produce wireless devices that can address the higher end of the radio frequency (RF) spectrum, while also remaining compact and inexpensive. The overall robustness of devices could be markedly improved, with elevated working temperatures, alongside greater resilience to voltage transients and electro-static discharge (ESD) strikes. Graphene’s incredible ability to conduct generated heat will result in less room needing to be taken up by thermal management mechanisms. Its superior radiation tolerance will make it invaluable in space-oriented applications, while a combination of its optical and conductive characteristics will be pivotal in the advancement of photonics — allowing faster modulation and higher degrees of sensitivity. So, given that graphene was first successfully isolated by a university research team way back in 2004, and we are now in 2021 – why has this universally celebrated ‘wonder material’ still to see widespread adoption by chip manufacturers? The overriding problem is that, though graphene is relatively easy to make on a small scale inside a stable laboratory environment, migrating its production to volume manufacturing facilities has considerable technical challenges. Yet this is something that is clearly going to be required by the major players in the semiconductor industry. Here the investment in production equipment is huge, so acceptable profit margins can only be achieved if the output quantities are high enough. Graphene synthesis therefore needs to be done in a completely scalable manner. Lessons learnt from history Key to graphene securing adoption within this sector will be the capacity for its production to be successfully aligned with established semiconductor fabrication processes. There must be adequate provision for it to be ramped up to very high volumes, rather than just remaining restricted to small batches with overly heavy price points. To do this calls for a method via which graphene deposition can be done across a wide area. There are clear similarities here with what happened within the semiconductor industry many decades ago. The early IC prototypes put together by Jack Kilby gave some idea of what was possible, but they did not come close to offering a commercially viable end product. It was not until an efficient way of producing these devices in large volumes was found that things could really start to take off. Once this was finally achieved, a few years later, then IC sales kept growing year on year — not just gradually, but at very close to an exponential rate. The much-famed Moore’s Law took hold, and because of the increasing transistor densities this projected, unit costs kept on falling. What was needed for ICs to become a success was the means to produce them in very large amounts with little expense — and this is the same dynamic that is at play when we talk about graphene today. By finding an effective volume production method for graphene that is suitable for semiconductor integration, it will be possible to tap into the economies of scale that drive the chip industry. Re-evaluating synthesis methodologies Currently, the commercial production of wide-area graphene monolayers relies on chemical deposition onto a metal catalyst (most commonly in the form of copper or nickel foil). If the graphene is going to be applied to a useful semiconductor substrate a transfer procedure needs to be carried out. This means etching away the copper film, picking up the graphene layer, and transferring it to a semiconductor wafer, like silicon. Copper from the catalyst that the graphene monolayer was originally grown on can end up being taken with it. The contamination impinging onto the graphene layer is detrimental to device reliability and yield. In addition, structural inconsistencies are commonly witnessed, which curb the performance parameters that can be achieved. Besides the quality issues outlined above, the transfer process is highly labor intensive. This makes it difficult to integrate the process into existing manufacturing facilities and therefore and raises the cost. All the resources poured into chemical deposition of graphene onto a copper substrate have failed to produce a scalable process that produces graphene at a quality the industry needs. A new approach Paragraph has pioneered an alternative to the flawed chemical deposition methodologies, which supports large-area graphene synthesis while still ensuring product purity. Its patented metalorganic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) technique means that graphene may be grown directly onto the semiconductor substrate, rather than needing to be transferred, thereby avoiding all the issues associated with such actions. MOCVD delivers consistently repeatable results and brings graphene synthesis in line with standard processes that represent the largest proportion of today’s semiconductor production. The graphene produced exhibits high degrees of structural integrity, while avoiding the contaminant problems that are associated with other methods. Graphene deposition is the starting point for wide scale use of the material in semiconductor applications. From there, growth of dielectrics on or below the graphene, lithography, and contacting all play a part in device design and performance. Adoption of new graphene growth methods opens the industry up to take advantage of its properties and develop complementary technologies for device manufacture. It is possible for a wide variety of different semiconductor substrates to be employed – such as Si (Si), gallium nitride (GaN), silicon carbide (SiC), and silicon germanium (SiGe). All kinds of semiconductor products could thus be improved via having graphene elements incorporated into them. Furthermore, the process will be straightforward for chip manufacturers to assimilate into their existing workflows, so there will be minimum disruption. The future of graphene in semiconductors Current manufacturing capacity allows for only small quantities of devices. However, new, and existing partnerships in the semiconductor industry will enable an expansion of capacity to full product level. Graphene-based products will remain more expensive that their alternatives in the short term, until the supply chains are fully developed and the benefit of economies of scale are realised. However, there is an immediate step change in device performance available from graphene-based devices. Graphene Hall Effect sensors developed by Paragraf are now seeing increasing use, with high-energy physics among the areas of greatest traction so far. Published collaborations between Paragraf and CERN have shown that Graphene Hall affect Sensors (GHS) exhibit negligible “planar Hall effect.” This property, which separates graphene from other materials, will enable new kinds of high accuracy magnet characterisation techniques. It is expected the graphene-enhanced RF components and optical modulators will also soon start to emerge. Graphene-based semiconductors will continue to build further momentum in the coming years as this sector gradually matures. — John Tingay is chief technology officer at Paragraf. | ![]() fireball xl5 | |
21/6/2021 13:18 | RTG....Yes poor Sloppy down on his vrs investment on Fests buying recommendation and a further £100k kick in the knackers on top! | ![]() smythe2 | |
21/6/2021 12:52 | What are you on Smythe?Whatever that nonsense is, it's nothing to do with me! | ![]() festario | |
21/6/2021 12:20 | Fest...DING DONG....Sloppy would not be in this predicament if you had not recommended this investment upon him..... If you got him into this mess why did you not get him out of it and sell like you claimed to have done and made monies. SHAME ON YOU! | ![]() smythe2 | |
21/6/2021 12:18 | Name one other lie, just one, and that question might deserve an answer. | ![]() festario | |
21/6/2021 12:01 | Fest.... you have clearly stated on this thread several times that you have made several trading transactions and made monies so what is the problem. This is high risk speculative investing on the aim not blue chip. So have you made monies or is it just more lies? | ![]() smythe2 | |
21/6/2021 11:14 | Seriously?To deliver literally nothing for shareholders since 2017? Despite 100s of tweets, podcasts and bullish RNS's?In what other walk of life would you tolerate this type of failure? | ![]() festario | |
21/6/2021 11:10 | Dear flatcoat1, Do you own a residential property of 3000 sq foot.... In your name, not someone else. Just curious as I know if you say anything liable there will be many people very interested I think you mean 'libelous' rather than 'liable'. No, I don't own a 3000 sq foot house. I would be absolutely terrified to own such a dwelling if the the Mighty Neill and his army of lawyers came knocking at my rather insignificant door, obviously. Wouldn't everyone? I have been at my wits end ever since superg1 said he was going to track down all critics and cause them to suffer in all kinds of horrible ways. That is equally terrifying, and has caused me no end of sleepless nights. | ![]() tweetingceo | |
21/6/2021 11:09 | Fest....It’s still a job in progress ( probs bigger than envisaged).The court will see this and make a judgment accordingly. | ![]() smythe2 | |
21/6/2021 10:42 | Debs, .. on your point 1.The defendant simply has to demonstrate that the things he has said could be true on the balance of probabilities.In this case, that's cut and dried. | ![]() festario | |
21/6/2021 10:42 | Do you own a residential property of 3000 sq foot.... In your name, not someone else. Just curious as I know if you say anything liable there will be many people very interested | ![]() flatcoat1 | |
21/6/2021 10:38 | kemche, bbm Sorry for ytpos. Therer are a number of problems over Libel laws which a defendant has to consider. 1. The first being its up to the defendant to prove that he hasn't libeled the claimant which is normally the reverse in normal case law. 2. The second problem for a defendant is if Neil Rickets taken advice on what he has bublished it can help his claim. I havent read claim particuars and it would be of interest if someione who has accest to publish those otherwise posters are speculating in the dark. | ![]() debsdowner | |
21/6/2021 10:34 | So we produce in Cambridge, Forest of Dean, South Korea and I sincerely hope in the EU (Gnanomat) at some time . Then maybe under licence others join in.Or maybe the price/weight ratio is such that projected area fulfill s our Unicorn Wishes?. | ![]() alchemy | |
21/6/2021 10:26 | I thought it was Sloppy in court facing legal proceedings not the ceo. | ![]() smythe2 | |
21/6/2021 10:20 | And not too far from Hereford in case VRS needs some serious protection from some of our more ruthless shareholders lol | ![]() shavian | |
21/6/2021 10:18 | No time like the present. Why not now? | ![]() bbmsionlypostafter | |
21/6/2021 10:18 | Indeed, or why not just follow through on just ONE of the grandiose promises from 2017 or 2018?That would blow away any doubters, but no. | ![]() festario | |
21/6/2021 10:15 | If and when the ceo and vrs become successful it would be the ideal time for the ceo to take out legal or just total discredit tw for what he is. | rudog1 | |
21/6/2021 10:13 | The danger that TW woulld face is NR probbaly taken advice on whatever he has published and got there lies the problem for TW. In English pls. Don't know what you are trying to say. | ![]() bbmsionlypostafter | |
21/6/2021 10:00 | debs, Do you foresee any problems for NR at all? | ![]() kemche | |
21/6/2021 09:58 | bbm, typo error corrected.. Whether NR decides to take on TW is another matter later on. TW seems to have it in for NR from what I can gather and ruin his reputation. The danger that TW woulld face is NR probbaly taken advice on whatever he has published and got there lies the problem for TW. | ![]() debsdowner | |
21/6/2021 09:42 | mutantcar 20 Jun '21 - 17:10 - 6185 of 6190 0 8 0 I believe the reason he's not taken action is that the way TW has his companie(s) etc. set up means it is difficult to get any money out of him. So now it's not so much about Ricketts clearing his good name(sic) & more about him making money? If you believe that then the logical conclusion is there is literally nothing that TW cannot say & Ricketts will still do nothing. That's odd, and obviously not the real reason NR is not suing TW. | ![]() bbmsionlypostafter |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions