ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

VRS Versarien Plc

0.07
-0.0243 (-25.77%)
Last Updated: 14:07:01
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Versarien Plc LSE:VRS London Ordinary Share GB00B8YZTJ80 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.0243 -25.77% 0.07 0.067 0.07 0.075 0.068 0.08 347,343,171 14:07:01
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec 5.45M -13.53M -0.0091 -0.08 1.4M
Versarien Plc is listed in the Chemicals & Chem Preps sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker VRS. The last closing price for Versarien was 0.09p. Over the last year, Versarien shares have traded in a share price range of 0.058p to 1.90p.

Versarien currently has 1,488,169,507 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Versarien is £1.40 million. Versarien has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.08.

Versarien Share Discussion Threads

Showing 62376 to 62396 of 204625 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  2497  2496  2495  2494  2493  2492  2491  2490  2489  2488  2487  2486  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/10/2018
16:26
Loglorry, would you please stop with your "the video was saying $300m MC by 2025"? Why not report all the other estimates you can find on the net? What about the ones that were shared by Neill on Twitter today?
mryl
09/10/2018
16:25
Aim Company of the Year?
doubleorquits
09/10/2018
16:24
Campbed - anything to report from the NPL conference in Teddington #38612
mjatkin82
09/10/2018
16:21
That will be the flippers and hopefully Katie out of the way, onwards and upwards.

I did wonder whether any of the II's buying on p/b would flip them and that question has been answered I would guess.

What was that about a TR1 and the 'cornerstone investor' as I thought they may have been flipping for profit too?

luckyorange
09/10/2018
16:20
Tim/log.
You know very well that the major collaborations started less than 12 months ago.

If we're wrong about vrs then that's our risk. We'll still be able to get on board with XG because they seem to be struggling to get rid of their ipo shares.

You've warned us, so now kindly do one.
Thanks in advance.

magic beans
09/10/2018
16:20
Adding around here. (again)
scottishfield
09/10/2018
16:19
Bounced a couple of times from 148p now. Could bode well
volsung
09/10/2018
16:15
Looking like a lost cause for the rampers now. They can't accept that they've been led up an ever lengthening garden path. I notice Lucian Miers has got this lot sussed as well.
rainbow23
09/10/2018
16:06
Log, why do you think it has to be XG or VRS? The market is going to be massive, with plenty of room for different companies.
------------

I don't at all. In the GEIC video they estimate a market size of $300m by 2025. That's not amazing. If VRS take 20% of that at say 20% net margins that's $12m of profit by 2025 not exactly knock the lights out sort of stuff is it for a £275m m/c company.

You are right though there is plenty of competition here. VRS seem quite a way behind here so you are effectively betting on them having the best product but other than NR and SuperG telling you so there is no real evidence of that. The adoption rate has been very very slow from collaborations which go back 3 years now.

loglorry1
09/10/2018
16:02
sp playing at submarines now but still a long way off the bottom.
rainbow23
09/10/2018
16:01
What a slaughter of the share price. Unfortunate. Only real news will do something here not tweets.....
thecrunk
09/10/2018
15:56
Log, why do you think it has to be XG or VRS? The market is going to be massive, with plenty of room for different companies. Having read the quality of the questions you have previously asked Neill, it shows you have a very limited knowledge of the science, so I'm not sure why you think you can advise other people on the subject.
occultusverum1
09/10/2018
15:53
Been busy

Just to reiterate. One in particular needs to buy a LOT to get out of his short position.

Nice song by the B52s by the way

Some shorts are T trades with the countdown clock ticking louder each day.

Amazing how much they will lie for gain.

Thank fk for XG and their lies a godsend for bear lies😂

superg1
09/10/2018
15:48
Tim/log
No need to thank me for pointing out that XG actually have falling quarterly revenues.
Their financial statement looks like a train wreck. Looks like they always miss their eoy revenue targets too.
Why are you on this board anyway? Surely not for our benefit?

magic beans
09/10/2018
15:45
Xg Sciences Inc's Revenue rose by % in II. Quarter (Jun 30 2018) year on year, to $1 million and declined by -4 % sequentially.

Xg Sciences Inc is Expected to report next financial results on November 06, 2018.





loglorry - if you are going to try comparing VRS with rivals, you could perhaps find a better example than XG? Or is that the best you've got?

grabster
09/10/2018
15:44
Lots of filtered posters today, wonder what they are saying 😂
richardc77
09/10/2018
15:43
Shaping up for a dive into the close now. Roll on tomorrow for another red ten.
NR has overegged the pudding big time here. A common trait in AIM CEOs.

rainbow23
09/10/2018
15:42
"At the end of the day sales are the acid test and VRS is falling way behind."

Are they really?

Even unprofitable sales?

Some business owner you'd be............

herschel k
09/10/2018
15:42
9 degrees re 38946
Share Centre are still messing about with my lot.
You are not alone

devereaux
09/10/2018
15:42
"You are assuming fewest layers is best always and that's simply not true. There are plenty of other factors that come into it."

I haven't said that, but let's see how much research you've really done - what other factors?

herschel k
09/10/2018
15:36
@HK yes I've done plenty of research. You are assuming fewest layers is best always and that's simply not true. There are plenty of other factors that come into it. In any case the spec sheet for Nanene uses Raman Spec to measure layers that's not even the certified way as per the ISO PAS standard which specifies BET so we don't even know if the numbers there are to be relied upon.

At the end of the day sales are the acid test and VRS is falling way behind.

loglorry1
Chat Pages: Latest  2497  2496  2495  2494  2493  2492  2491  2490  2489  2488  2487  2486  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock