We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Velocys Plc | LSE:VLS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B11SZ269 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.2725 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
23/8/2018 09:52 | Short covering in progress! | seadiver | |
22/8/2018 20:41 | We seemed to have cleared all stop losses! We should start to hit buy stops heading north! | seadiver | |
22/8/2018 17:13 | Another blue close....momentum shift imo back up to 10p + sharply | laptop15 | |
20/8/2018 17:48 | Filling that 750K buy? | mikemine | |
20/8/2018 17:35 | Has the stop loss hunting finished ? | seadiver | |
20/8/2018 14:47 | Excellent reply Highgate cemetery making room already | hampton58 | |
20/8/2018 08:53 | Obituary column? | goodgrief | |
19/8/2018 22:26 | Mentioned in Sunday telegraph | hampton58 | |
17/8/2018 18:30 | Spurious, I agree with most of what you said but not this "I have news for you the leak has been identified and fixed " You are correct if you are referring to the unaffected reactor but, unless you have information that we don't have, the affected reactor remains dormant and presumably "unfixed". It may have been fixed but I can think of no reason they wouldn't be using it again if it was. Surely the insurance company wouldn't object as it would mitigate further losses. Arguing over who pays for what would continue while production continues. | mikemine | |
17/8/2018 15:48 | Thanks you are right, I was half sleep! | seadiver | |
17/8/2018 11:38 | I made a spurious comment in my previous note. TRI's gasification technology which Velocys will be using in the Natchez plant will be used in Fulcrum's plant not the Red Rock Biofuels one. This is actually even more positive since the Fulcrum plant is further along. | fluky | |
17/8/2018 11:17 | Seadiver (2101) "VLS has technical now how to make £££ Shouldn't that "now how" be "how now" as in "How now, brown cow"? P.S. it's spelled "know" as in "knowhow". | arf dysg | |
17/8/2018 10:20 | Buy low sell high | seadiver | |
17/8/2018 10:04 | I am read to purchase more shares if the goes down. Will start selling above 50p. | seadiver | |
17/8/2018 10:02 | By this time next year we will be trading above 30p | seadiver | |
17/8/2018 10:00 | The future is clean fuel/air and VLS has technical now how to make ££££££££ | seadiver | |
17/8/2018 08:56 | wanski Your concern for my financial welfare and those other muppets on this BB touches my heart but we really don't need your concern because we're big boys who don't cry every time the share price moves a few decimal points so grow up and shut up because the more drivel that spills out of your ugly gob the more of an idiot you look | spurious | |
16/8/2018 22:44 | Poke hard enough and its amazing what crawls out from under the rock | spurious | |
16/8/2018 22:29 | I'm afraid the lunatics are well and truly out of the assylum | spurious | |
16/8/2018 21:57 | spurious - So what you saying once the insurance is validated the plant can be restarted. After this hiccup, how long do you think potential customers would require for testing the plant before convincing themselves it is a viable product. One year or maybe two, personally I would like to see it running at full capacity for at least a year, with no hiccups...whoevers fault it is... | beeezzz | |
16/8/2018 21:00 | Well folks it was only a matter of time till Wanski's alter ego appears Fluky post 2090 exact quote "It does not matter who is to blame, or whether the insurance will pick up the costs, the project developer will take the hit. The longer it takes to fix the issue, the worse Velocys looks as the ENVIA project developer." An exact quote from another deep thinker or should I say Wanski's alter ego Let us deal with this line by line from another delusional with a clear agenda to mislead (1)it does not matter who is to blame What a stupid remark Well It clearly does as the fault has nothing to do with Velocys technology as stated by the company but that of ancillary kit If it had been then Velocys would indeed suffer reputational and financial damage (2) You also say it does not matter whether the insurance will pick up the costs Have you truly lost your marbles The millions of pounds that will come from a successful claim will mean any losses suffered by Envia inc loss of income will be made good and as a 33% stakeholder in Envia, Velocys will suffer no material losses (3) You say the longer it takes to fix the issue the worse Velocys looks as the Envia project developer I have news for you the leak has been identified and fixed We await the insurance company validating the claim That is all that is holding up an announcement Fluky you like to pretend you have some technical knowledge to impress any who would give you time You throw in a positive comment about Red Rock to seem impartial but the overwhelming tone is one of total negativity based on lies and deceit. You are clearly an embittered ex employee with a grudge who will twist and lie to suit your agenda I hope all on this board will see you for what you are A cheap fraud | spurious |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions