Tyratech (DI) Share Discussion Threads

[techair] 09/10/2015 18:40

Sorry Micheal I have the unfortunate misfortune of being involved with TYR placings before those ones! Go back a little further with the RNSs

[michaelsadvfn] 09/10/2015 11:55

They have very little stock @ under 4p, in fact everything that was sold sub 4p has gone so I can't work out where they are coming up with these buy/sell prices.

[michaelsadvfn] 09/10/2015 10:02

techair 9 Oct'15 - 09:28 - 152 of 153 0 0

Sorry Michael heard it all before with TYR.

No you haven't, you're just repeating something you have read countless times on other threads.

The last 2 placings were in March 2013 when AMVAC took 50m shares for a 29.3% stake and then in July 2014 to get the UK market up and running. Directors also subscribed for 3.1m shares in that first placing.

You insinuate Tyratech has one discounted placing after another which is simply just not the case.

Try posting something sensible.

[techair] 09/10/2015 09:28

Sorry Michael heard it all before with TYR. All imho!

[michaelsadvfn] 09/10/2015 09:23

Why would there be a placing?

Based on the Company's existing cash, its current operating plans, anticipated revenues from product sales and collaborative arrangements, and the ability to control costs, the Company's revised forecasts indicate that it will have sufficient cash resources for at least the next twelve months.

Perhaps you should stop just repeating what you read on these boards?

[techair] 09/10/2015 09:17

MMs just don't want to hold this stock. Normally a precursor to a placing imho

[michaelsadvfn] 09/10/2015 09:02

Just took 50k @ 3.4825.

There has to be a bottom somewhere...

[michaelsadvfn] 08/10/2015 16:30

I begin to think we have a seller.

MM's have never taken in stock below 3.5p to sell on at a profit so why 3.5p on the offer? I don't understand this anymore.

The same happened at KIBO where they drove the price down to ridiculous levels, 1.3p, then in the space of 2 weeks they hit 12p.

[al h] 07/10/2015 10:16

Don't think trading has much to with it. Clearly the monkeys have just walked the share price back onto their previous scripted downward trendline.


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com


True there's little buying, but there's also relatively limited selling. No doubt the spivs will spike it back up at some point, nice gap above to tempt punters with. All a big game of churning the pot to make some money, up, down ... makes no difference.

[michaelsadvfn] 07/10/2015 09:51

...and down she goes on the first sell of the day. No support whatsoever...

[michaelsadvfn] 05/10/2015 13:56

Without any buying interest the only way this share can go is....down.

Is this share really such a pile of garbage? I think not, unfortunately I appear to be in the minority.

[al h] 05/10/2015 12:52

Perhaps if you sell 5 lots of 10 shares each you can get the share price down to a penny. Seems that's all it takes, a few beer money sells clearly means the share is worthless.

[michaelsadvfn] 02/10/2015 09:40

71k @ 4.1999. That's a hell of a price.

[michaelsadvfn] 02/10/2015 08:31

Good spot Al H. Not sure where the 100k fits into that but hey ho...

[al h] 02/10/2015 08:25

275K = the sum of those 25, 50 and 100K trades yesterday, suspect they're related, smoke and mirrors

[michaelsadvfn] 02/10/2015 08:08

275k dumped @ 4.125 yesterday, hence the drop.

4.25 to buy. Never thought I'd see that.

[michaelsadvfn] 01/10/2015 09:53

Blimey, 2 buys before 10 a.m., we'll be in auction at this rate...

[michaelsadvfn] 30/9/2015 15:34

Laughable indeed.

They drop the price by 5.6% on a 20k sell, in comes a 69k buy and they don't move.
No wonder the AIM market has such a bad reputation.

[al h] 30/9/2015 11:25

LOL ... and again, bent as they come the old monkeys, 800 quids worth, totally laughable

[michaelsadvfn] 29/9/2015 10:48

Yes, that's right. Problem is there isn't a buyer in sight.

Think all this has to be blamed on which ever analyst came up with the forecast for 2015. IIRC they were looking for $9m...from 900k for 2014, 10x thus. 'Materially better' would suggest at least $4m for the second half resulting in $7.5m for the year. Not really far out if you consider they had no history on which to base their estimate.

Just have to wait for the second half to pan out & hope for decent Vamousse sales.

[al h] 29/9/2015 10:38

About half the volume to drop it back as it took to go up in the first place ...

[michaelsadvfn] 29/9/2015 10:18

I don't blame the mm's, they are just doing their job. It does also work the other way when the share price rises.

If someone is happy to sell 170k @ 4.375 there's nothing we can do about it. Let's see how many nutters want to give them away for 4.25p so they can go off and chase 'the next best thing'.