Thg Share Discussion Threads

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 22:46

Lets hope this is the start of further good news.

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 22:46

Could it be the trader at numis issuing the retracted note is actually a fall guy

[space_bob] 17/11/2021 22:34

At £2.10:

Bad Robot9 Nov '21 - 13:23 - 2906 of 3723
THG rise will be essentially something like Bitcoin on steroids. Everyone wants in.
At this price, this is a near sure thing.

He's down by a massive percentage just the same as he is on Darktrace and several others. Luckily we're not talking big sums as he only gambles his JSA.

[goforgold1] 17/11/2021 22:19

Short squeeze.

[bad robot] 17/11/2021 22:17

Ladies and Gents

Please lock your children in their rooms, when nonce SpazBob is lurking in our hood.

BR
IN BR WE TRUST
RED MERCURY CREW

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 22:01

Yep don't disagree its been really odd

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 21:45

Its good to have an objective viewpoint. I certainly hope your idea of a whistleblower is misplaced though

[space_bob] 17/11/2021 21:41

“…staff to wear masks as a “stop-gap measure”

So there was an issue. All the THG warehouses around the world look the same, so there is a chance there was a minor issue with non compliance with US rules. Fair chance the workers were dismissed legitimately but are then using whatever dirt they have to fight back. Lawyers probably working on no win no fee and a reasonable chance THG will settle for a million or two as a business decision as it will be cheaper than defending. All BS but it's there none the less.
The point I was making is that the case relates to dangerous materials and the skull and cross are the symbols for those, which is why the Times used that graphic. What else should they have used, a topless pic of MM?
Obviously there are 'heightened emotions' around THG at the moment, but just trying to be objective.

[goforgold1] 17/11/2021 21:16

Over the pond Reddit getting involved tomorrow looks like big squeeze coming . Should start tomorrow after 1pm about

[g2theary] 17/11/2021 21:11

Are we going to see a short term bounce here?! I mean I made money on the 1st bounce but down 10k since 240 a share ... however I feel for the share holders that paid 500p and even plus (not necessarily the + ones as much because I thought this was over valued at 800p) that being said there's nothing wrong with this company ?

[space_bob] 17/11/2021 21:04

Warning symbol for poison is a skull with a cross. Doubt the claims will succeed. They're probably hoping for an out of court settlement.

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 21:01

https://www.cityam.com/city-broker-numis-reports-itself-to-fca-over-thg-analyst-memo-that-went-a-step-too-far/

[mcmather] 17/11/2021 21:00

Aye (bob), but then again the action is going to use words such as 'poisonous' and 'dangerous' - to inflate / enhance the claims - as opposed to perfume and batteries.

All plaintiffs seem to be working (if they have been correctly ID'd) and seemingly with at least 2 in positions similar to the positions they had with THG. If their claims were substantial - long term illness or injury, PTSD, etc - that would unlikely be the case.

The red triangle, skull and red cross infers DANGER / DO NOT ENTER / STAY CLEAR. At the very best, it was a dubious image to use. Hopefully the reason behind using it was not sinister...

[senseibull] 17/11/2021 20:59

Could make a film of these twists and turns

[space_bob] 17/11/2021 20:56

"If the latter, then have they provided their own clients with the best / impartial advice pertaining to THG? Imagine if you were a client of theirs, had sold your shares at ‘X’ price following their 230p note, but only to see the share price reverting back towards £4 / £5 / £6, etc."

The fact is it hasn't reverted back to £4 / £5 / £6. Whatever the rights and wrongs, Numis clients who followed their advice have saved an absolute fortune. You're more likely to see a claim against the analysts who had a positive outlook, because they have cost their clients a fortune.

[space_bob] 17/11/2021 20:52

If you look at the details of the civil claim it's related to storage of 'poisonous' and 'dangerous' chemicals (likely perfume and batteries), so the graphic is appropriate. I doubt very much that the author mocked up the photo - it will have been sent to a graphics team who would have skimmed the article and banged that out in 30 minutes.

[mcmather] 17/11/2021 20:39

‘Murky allegations’ #3699. Great line.

The stated ‘fallout’; between THG and Numis from the IPO could make matters worse for Numis. Did they really believe a fair value for THG to be their target price of 230p, and a figure that they presumably informed their own clients of? Or was this a simple attempt at retribution against THG, dating back to the claimed post-IPO ‘fall-out̵7;?

If the latter, then have they provided their own clients with the best / impartial advice pertaining to THG? Imagine if you were a client of theirs, had sold your shares at ‘X’ price following their 230p note, but only to see the share price reverting back towards £4 / £5 / £6, etc. That would lead to questions about whether they have your best interests at heart. Or whether that is secondary to Numis just settling a score? Get one or two others throwing stuff around at the same time…

They already have serious stuff to answer here. Might this now extend to questions from their own clients? Issues re trustworthiness and credibility??

Murky.

[goforgold1] 17/11/2021 20:11

THG MUST TAKE THIS ALL THE WAY . THE DAMAGE THEY HAVE DONE IS UNPRECEDENTED ON ONE COMPANY WITH NO EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THERE CLAIMS . THG YOU HAVE 700 million in bank you have the power and money to take these down as they tried to do to you .Plus that Oliver Shah he is hiding something as well to coincidental with his write ups .

[goforgold1] 17/11/2021 20:08

RETRACTING THE CLAIMS IS TO LATE DAMAGE DONESUE THESES FUVKERS Numis "formally retracted" the claims in the original memo, and has reportedly turned to the FCA – a move that demonstrates the gravity of the situation, in the broker's eyes.It comes after Numis had already taken a tough stance on the group, which has had a tumultuous few weeks, in separate analyses leading up to the memo.Last month, analyst Simon Bowler had the lowest target for the group at 230p, and was the only investment bank analyst with a negative recommendation on the company.