We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tern Plc | LSE:TERN | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BFPMV798 | ORD 0.02P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.05 | -2.27% | 2.15 | 2.00 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 2.20 | 187,094 | 13:16:34 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finance Services | 66k | -10.45M | -0.0269 | -0.80 | 8.55M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/1/2020 12:56 | Poor old JonC not an effin clue!!! Shown to be a complete novice at De-Ramping. P/S hope his mate has not been sectioned. | wardy333 | |
19/1/2020 12:43 | Ridicule, I agree with your idea about the promotional video for Tern, but your proposal is flawed as no more capital will flow into Tern without a new share issue. Such a capital raise is expensive and administratively demanding which is why Tern always resorts to bucket shop raises of capital for shares. The wrong approach in the opinion of me and a lot of others, but easy and relatively inexpensive for the company. | jerseymike | |
19/1/2020 12:26 | Tag team this weekend | arab3 | |
19/1/2020 12:14 | Yeah and Home Assistants are so 'useful'.PMSL!!!!! | seewhatimean | |
19/1/2020 12:01 | They can only be memories because the shorting scum who have been selling all this borrowed stock comes unstuck and forced into bankruptcy because of s stunning RNS. As the more level headed posters have reminded us there has hardly ever been an update from a webinar and nobody should expect one. Do think(hope) that this one is different but wouldn't be confident about it, Now will everybody get off ADVFN for the rest of the day and go out to enjoy the sunshine | sweepie2 | |
19/1/2020 11:59 | JonC Stop lying re-read my post 183248, even a child could see how the investee companies are disruptive. Rather than produce any serious competition evidence, at post 183262, you produce a link, that we were all noting last week as good news for FVR. You need to keep up, but thanks for your support anyway. PS I wouldn’t pay you to short for me, even on a Sunday. | ridicule | |
19/1/2020 11:55 | If not already this week will put DA in headlights for all major companies to take note! | dave444 | |
19/1/2020 11:49 | If we are not just memories will you STFU? | jonc | |
19/1/2020 11:48 | One last blast Jon the C and Fuxy or has he already given up. I'm more than confident that by Tuesday you will both be just a memory. | likya123 | |
19/1/2020 11:46 | IoT is an expensive way of doing something that is already being done, it is not disruptive...Pretty simple to understand... People think they have a smart home because their phone or Alexa works as a remote control, that is all it is, a remote control.. | stead41 | |
19/1/2020 11:44 | So you are not able to say how the investee compnies are disruptive but you continue to make the claim. You are revealed as a ramping charlatan. However in the interest of balance I did come across this just now. | jonc | |
19/1/2020 11:42 | IMHO a big week this coming week. | ebomber | |
19/1/2020 11:34 | Ridicule, the main reason I am still here is because DA is still demonstrably 'top of the pile'. I, and I am sure others, have spent countless hours over the years analysing rival products and where I didn't understand something I educated myself until I did. If there was something out there better than DA that was being picked up by blue chips then I would have sold and moved on. Success in this sphere for a relative tiddler like DA is a binary bet. Either you have something special and the world needs it or you have something 2nd, 3rd or 4th best and you might as well pack up because no-one will want you. I think next week could be very revealing. | mike routhorn | |
19/1/2020 11:29 | No I have a better idea. You tell me how each company is unique. You are the one claiming that they are disruptive. | jonc | |
19/1/2020 11:26 | JonC, the 4 examples I gave are unique and quasi monopolies because they were disruptive and caught the market Competition napping. The 4 investee company revenue streams are modest today because the IoT hockey stick is only just beginning to form, but let me throw a challenge back to you for a change. You say there are bigger and more powerful competitors to our investee companies, so answer the following: 1. Name the company that is competing with DA and getting more traction? 2. Name the company that is competing with FVR and showing greater potential that must have been overlooked by the Mayo Clinic. 3. Name me the mesh computing company that is showing Wylde a clean pair of heels? 4. Name me the Company that is beating InVMa with it’s Keyscaler protection. | ridicule | |
19/1/2020 11:25 | Code signing for bank pos systems a key vertical? | still waiting | |
19/1/2020 10:56 | I don't need an explanation ridicule. I want someone to say what is disruptive about any of the investee companies. You give four examples but they were pretty unique or became quasi monopolies in their field. All of the investee companies have many competitors of which many have greater traction and sales that dwarf anything the investee companies do. The idea that any of the investee companies will gain market domination in any field is laughable and lacks any credibility based on what has happened so far. | jonc |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions