Tavistock Investments Share Discussion Threads

[doubledippers] 15/4/2021 12:58

The notion that this management team can all of a sudden deliver a higher valuation is disingenuous. After more than seven years of abject failure, their word is meaningless. They are running out of ideas and the latest delaying tactic is nothing more than a bluff. Open up the books!

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 21:37

40.90%. A BIG FIGURE OF SUPPORT for Tavistock.

And that does not include the multitude of other investors who are ALSO AGAINST the potential bid but who have not given public Letters of Intent to Tavistock.




In effect, this means the 75% needed for a Scheme of Arrangement is stone-cold dead.


It also demonstrates that the 50% needed for a hostile hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[mandarin4] 14/4/2021 21:28

I’ve said before I would like to hear more of his views, he makes some valid points, BUT it’s like dealing with an adolescent and tiresome.

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 18:01

40.90%. A BIG FIGURE OF SUPPORT for Tavistock.

And that does not include the multitude of other investors who are ALSO AGAINST the potential bid but who have not given public Letters of Intent to Tavistock.




In effect, this means the 75% needed for a Scheme of Arrangement is stone-cold dead.


It also demonstrates that the 50% needed for a hostile hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[nicholasblake] 14/4/2021 17:29

Tavistock have made this fairly easy for TEAM advisers.

* Approach those who've given LOIs in support of rejection and ask what price they WOULD support.

* Then announce that TEAM would CONSIDER offering that price, conditional on DD.

Would be very difficult for management not to open books.

EGM removal territory if they refused.

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 16:27

40.90%. A BIG FIGURE OF SUPPORT for Tavistock.

And that does not include the multitude of other investors who are ALSO AGAINST the potential bid but who have not given public Letters of Intent to Tavistock.




In effect, this means the 75% needed for a Scheme of Arrangement is stone-cold dead.


It also demonstrates that the 50% needed for a hostile hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 15:48

40.90%. A BIG FIGURE OF SUPPORT for Tavistock.

And that does not include the multitude of other investors who are ALSO AGAINST the potential bid but who have not given public Letters of Intent to Tavistock.




In effect, this means the 75% needed for a Scheme of Arrangement is stone-cold dead.


It also demonstrates that the 50% needed for a hostile hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 13:44

40.90% AGAINST.

And that does not include the multitude of other investors who are ALSO AGAINST but who have not given public Letters of Intent.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 13:35

Tavistock mention that the opportunistic Team bid has been "supported by a small grouping of former employees and disaffected shareholders".


A not-uncommon story of disgruntled former employees who bear festering grudges and try to cause irritation to their former employer.

No-one is interested.

It is informing to read Team's RNS's detailing letter of intent commitments.


It is obvious which posters on this bulletin board fall into this bracket.


They are to be ignored.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[raph_andrew] 14/4/2021 11:06

The moment any decent point gets raised, QP comes back with his usual nonsense content.

[makeamillion3] 14/4/2021 11:05

Here we go again.... Dont you have figures that need your attention?

I don’t think anyone doubts the potential here QP, it’s had this potential for years once all the funds were aligned to a in house fund management team as opposed 3rd parties.

What is concerning however is how this has been allowed to drop to such a low market cap and yet 2 people almost demand rewards for getting it back to something like realistic. Like that is even acceptable in any way.

I hate to repeat myself but you appear to forget you have posted exactly the same comments about 10 times now.

Let say I manage a portfolio for a client for £750k....

Due to my poor management and awful performance the investment is now worth £130k

Someone else is interested in taking this over so I somehow get the value up to £250k and tell all how amazing the last 2 months have been.

I then demand from the client that if I can get the value back to 700k (below start point) I want a big bonus payout for my amazing performance.

Laughable. Disgusting.

Oh and while the values are incredibly low, I’ll buy in with mates to ensure I secure I get a bottom price before the increase.

Priceless. How do people sleep?

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 10:52

Tavistock mention that the opportunistic Team bid has been "supported by a small grouping of former employees and disaffected shareholders".


A not-uncommon story of disgruntled former employees who bear festering grudges and try to cause irritation to their former employer.

No-one is interested.

It is informing to read Team's RNS's detailing letter of intent commitments.


It is obvious which posters on this bulletin board fall into this bracket.


They are to be ignored.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[makeamillion3] 14/4/2021 10:32

I don’t think anyone doubts the potential here QP, it’s had this potential for years once all the funds were aligned to a in house fund management team as opposed 3rd parties.

What is concerning however is how this has been allowed to drop to such a low market cap and yet 2 people almost demand rewards for getting it back to something like realistic. Like that is even acceptable in any way.

I hate to repeat myself but you appear to forget you have posted exactly the same comments about 10 times now.

Let say I manage a portfolio for a client for £750k....

Due to my poor management and awful performance the investment is now worth £130k

Someone else is interested in taking this over so I somehow get the value up to £250k and tell all how amazing the last 2 months have been.

I then demand from the client that if I can get the value back to 700k (below start point) I want a big bonus payout for my amazing performance.

Laughable. Disgusting.

Oh and while the values are incredibly low, I’ll buy in with mates to ensure I secure I get a bottom price before the increase.

Priceless. How do people sleep?

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 10:08

Excellent recent performance by the newly-installed Chief Investment Officer who has rapidly managed to promote all ACUMEN funds to TOP QUARTILE.

Such performance was lacking in the past.

Outstanding recent Trading Update bodes well for an exceedingly bright and INDEPENDENT future.

ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 14/4/2021 10:04

Tavistock mention that the opportunistic Team bid has been "supported by a small grouping of former employees and disaffected shareholders".


A not-uncommon story of disgruntled former employees who bear festering grudges and try to cause irritation to their former employer.

No-one is interested.

It is informing to read Team's RNS's detailing letter of intent commitments.


It is obvious which posters on this bulletin board fall into this bracket.


They are to be ignored.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[doubledippers] 14/4/2021 09:43

It's easy to lose track of why the share price is trading down here.

The facts are grim. The company has been grossly mismanaged by the board and no one has been either held accountable or responsible for failure. This must change immediately.

Raven and Cooke have had more than seven years to create shareholder value, but instead they have wasted every opportunity and focused on lining their own pockets. Team Plc and any other interested parties should be allowed access to the books to conduct due diligence.

Let’s see if there are any other skeletons hiding along side the “alleged”; captive cell insurance facility!

[tomgold] 14/4/2021 08:38

Still slightly better than the current board trying and failing to steal the company from ordinary shareholders 3 times.

5p a share for this company is a very rich valuation, no one in their right minds would pay over a 100% premium especially with Crooke and Raven stripping the business at the going rate.

Don’t get me wrong I want this to go as high as possible but you would have to be pretty wreckless to come in at 5p without sight of the books.

[origami74] 14/4/2021 08:36

TEAM are prepared to offer more (if the company is worth more) but in order to do so want access the the books and a proper set of results. Support for TEAM does not endorse the 2.5p offer all it does is allow TEAM to have more information to make a more informed offer.

5p may be the magic number but TEAM will not offer it without more information. They do not want to over pay for a complete can of worms - Why would you make an offer of 5p for something which was recently trading at 1.4p without due diligence.

Looking at the backing of TEAM they can raise the cash for deal but the backers will not support them without due diligence.

[mandarin4] 14/4/2021 08:04

Time is running out for TEAM. I am not surprised by the poor support they have achieved for their deal as I have said before they are trying to steal the company by offering a tiny piece of paper. Unless they have secured at least another 10% they are dead in the water. Only a significant increase of their offer will save them now I think.

[red army] 10/4/2021 19:01

20p my sell out with this customer base