We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Plc | LSE:SUP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BDT89C08 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.50 | 4.53% | 150.00 | 118,927 | 16:35:18 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145.00 | 154.00 | 150.00 | 143.50 | 144.00 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household Appliance Stores | 221.25M | 22.43M | 0.1923 | 7.77 | 167.38M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:35:18 | UT | 13,895 | 150.00 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/2/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Total Voting Rights |
| 31/1/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Total Voting Rights |
| 02/1/2025 | 13:57 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Holding(s) in Company |
| 02/1/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Block Admission Return |
| 31/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Total Voting Rights |
| 02/12/2024 | 13:05 | ALNC |  Supreme buys Typhoo Tea for GBP10.2 million |
| 02/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Acquisition of Typhoo Tea for £10.2 million |
| 29/11/2024 | 12:17 | ALNC | TAKING AIM: Supreme "in good hands" regardless of Typhoo Tea outcome |
| 28/11/2024 | 16:18 | ALNC | Supreme in "advanced" talks over potential acquisition of Typhoo Tea |
| 28/11/2024 | 15:11 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Potential Acquisition of Typhoo Tea |
Supreme (SUP) Share Charts1 Year Supreme Chart |
|
1 Month Supreme Chart |
Intraday Supreme Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/3/2025 | 09:03 | Supreme imports floats on AIM | 1,548 |
| 21/1/2001 | 21:49 | SUPERFRAME | 2 |
| 11/1/2001 | 23:00 | SPERFRAME a Super Shell ? | - |
| 11/1/2001 | 23:00 | SUPERFRAME a Super Shell ? | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 16:35:18 | 150.00 | 13,895 | 20,842.50 | UT |
| 2025-03-14 16:29:27 | 150.00 | 2,550 | 3,825.00 | O |
| 2025-03-14 16:15:16 | 145.00 | 9 | 13.05 | O |
| 2025-03-14 16:15:16 | 154.00 | 400 | 616.00 | O |
| 2025-03-14 16:15:16 | 145.00 | 5 | 7.25 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 15/3/2025 08:20 by Supreme Daily Update Supreme Plc is listed in the Household Appliance Stores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SUP. The last closing price for Supreme was 143.50p.Supreme currently has 116,641,536 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Supreme is £174,379,096. Supreme has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 7.77. This morning SUP shares opened at 144p |
Posted at 05/3/2025 15:10 by sphere25 This move down looks like one seller in size who has given the order to Berenberg.They are sat at 151p on the offer with the other market makers sat at 155p. Similar thing happened at ASTO and it had a pop when the seller (Griffiths) was done. There are currently five market makers sat on the bid at 150p. Had a go at 151p to see if it can bounce here. If it falls under 150p, I will exit and try again. I think this move ties in with the trade attempt I had here a short while back when the price was around 177p. There were aload of 500k prints hitting the book making it look like someone was coming in to buy big, but they then turned out to be false prints and were corrected. The cynic in me wonders whether some were keyed on purpose to make it look like a big buyer was coming in to attract buyers, because it is very evident now that somebody wants out. Nonetheless, it looks worth a watch for a bounce when this seller is cleared. It could be a forced seller, as per most of the market, unless someone has news? There are alot of these downward moves out there, which are now exacerbated by Trump's tariffs. SUP were trading strongly with that natural divisive stance on Vaping. I wrote on the BEG board yesterday that the selling in the US could test Trump's pain threshold (he clearly likes to be judged by the market moves) and later on in the day, they have already blinked abit with Lutnick almost being forced by the market selling to make a comment and now some compromise type statements coming out. It is hard to know how companies are being affected by these tariffs when they keep yo-yo'ing about like this...this country, that country....this amount....oh now...a a pause...oh no pause now....oh now abit more on China.....oh now maybe a compromise and meet in the middle. Negotiating tactic for some, outright stupidity for others, but that is what we are all dealing with. Can SUP bounce here? How much gloom is in the price here. It looks oversold, but hard to call bottoms...especially in this market. Let's see. All imo DYOR |
Posted at 17/2/2025 09:31 by gb904150 ACTSCap - nice analysis.Yes, SUP is a high quality growth business led by an enterprising founder and majority shareholder. They will adapt and pivot to the best opportunities available to them. Meanwhile, big tobacco need to pivot to NGP's (smokeless). In BATS most recent results their target is to be >50% revs from NGP's by 2035. Currently £26bn revs. Smokeless is 17.5% of that. - £20.685bn combustibles - £4.5bn smokeless New categories: - Vapour - £1.7bn - Heated products - £0.9bn - Modern oral (pouches) - £0.8bn - Traditional oral (gum) - £1bn In short, they need vapour category to increase significantly. To do so they will need to add millions of new users. That will not come organically, it will come through acquisitions. SUP have no need to sell. The segment is very profitable and the overall SUP business is very profitable, cash generative and unleveraged. SUP just need to keep converting smokers to vapers. The more customers they have, the more attractive that segment is for big tobacco. When the price is right I've no doubt they will sell it. Meanwhile the acquirers are very cash rich and have KPI's that require them to grow the NGP's segment. People's bonuses at big tobacco will depend on that KPI of growing NGP's. So you can be sure that in time, they will acquire to ensure those KPI's get hit! No idea how long that will take however. But in the meantime there's a growing, profitable business, paying divi's. Maybe big tobacco think the point of maximum opportunity is when UK regulations kick in that require all the extra compliance and taxes. But that means another year or two of not hitting their targets. SUP would do well to acquire more low budget vape companies like Liberty flights in the meantime as they integrate them very efficiently. Or perhaps expand into Europe where they could no doubt expand market share. Shame their brand name of 88Vape translates to quatre-vingt-huit in French. Does exactly roll of the tongue. Quick rename to 8-vape and all is good though if you ask me. Huit-vape rolls of the tongue a bit like vite-fait. Has a 'Quick vape' kind of ring to it. Perhaps I'll suggest it to Sandy! |
Posted at 30/12/2024 09:24 by gb904150 The important point is that SUP have the resources to navigate and adhere to new regulation. The tiny vape co's that pop up from time to time don't have those resources.More regulation will mean more consolidation. Liberty flights was a perfect example and there are loads more out there. SUP can integrate them into their distribution platform with ease and gain several thousand new customers. A wider ban on all vape advertising is possible but that doesn't stop existing vapers. Amongst young people the advertising is word of mouth via other vapers. An ad ban would have limited effect. So in summary I'd say an ad ban is pretty unlikely to happen, even if it did happen it would take a while to come in, if it came in it would have limited effect. |
Posted at 02/12/2024 08:19 by ggplyr So its a trade and assets purchase, 7.5m in stocks and trade receivables, the good bit of working capital.The other 2.7 presumably brand/goodwill. RNS says they did 20m revenue. supreme think they can do 30% gross profit i.e. 6.7m Distribution costs in Typhoo tea's accounts were 2.3m Admin expenses were 6.2, lets assume supreme strip this down to 1m (wild guess on my part) assume very little admin costs if they are getting absorbed in current Oh base. tax at 25% PAT = 2.5m Investment so far 10.2m Payback period 4 years Return on investment 25%. Looks pretty good on paper. Risks - declining market share- current year 20m revenue, prior year 25, year before 34m. Opportunities - typhoo ice tea? The news articles all read typhoo tea "saved" / "rescued"- and they reference the 100 odd employees, but from the RNS supreme arent keeping these employees. |
Posted at 26/11/2024 11:09 by ggplyr Yes they went up in october, not all shops passed them price rise on immediately, but supreme had increased their prices to retailers from october (i questioned this through investor relations when i still saw them retailing for £1 at the end of October)Sandy thought there would be zero impact on volume following the price rise. I'm not sure i can make the investor presentation today, so if anyone could ask the question "has the 10ml liquid price increase to £1.20 impacted sales volume from the EPOS data you have access to, and how much of the 20 pence is Supreme retaining as gross profit" that would be greatly appreciated. This will feed through to GP in the second half. I dont know if retailers knowing the rise was coming ordered additional stock before it did. Lets hope not, otherwise this half just reported would have inflated sales. |
Posted at 31/10/2024 14:25 by ggplyr Impact of Tax on Vaping DemandCurrent Costs • 88Vape Liquid: A user consumes 3 bottles (10ml each) per week, costing £3.60 (at £1.20 per bottle). • Smoking: An average smoker consuming 10 cigarettes a day spends about £55 per week. The cheapest brand in Tesco costs around £41.13 per week. • Rolling Tobacco: Costs about 65% of the price of cigarettes, equating to £36 per week. • 88Nic Pouches: £2.50 for 20 pouches, with moderate users consuming 3-6 pouches a day, costing between £2.62 and £5.25 per week. Projected Costs in October 2026 • Vaping: £11.52 per week. • Smoking: £60 per week. • Rolling Tobacco: £39 per week. • 88Nic Pouches: Remains between £2.62 and £5.25 per week. Analysis • Vaping Costs: Despite the price increase, vaping remains cheaper than smoking. Other brands might cost £15-£17 per week, still significantly less than smoking. • Market Dynamics: Users may seek cheaper alternatives, potentially increasing 88Vape’s market share. Some users might switch to pouches being the cheapest, though they may not be as effective as vapes in mimicking the smoking experience. • Price Sensitivity: The significant price increase from £1.20 to £3.84 per bottle might lead some vapers to consider quitting or switching back to smoking. Even more so for more expensive liquid brand could be in the region of £5.50/ 10ml. This isn’t far off the price of a cheap 10 pack of cigarettes which may have a psychological pull. • Comparative Taxation: The UK’s vape tax is moderate compared to other countries. For example, Germany taxes e-liquids at €2 per 10ml, rising to €3.20 per 10ml by 2026. However, UK cigarette prices are among the highest in Europe, more than double that in Italy and Germany, making the vape tax relatively lower in proportion. Check out this: hxxps://www.numbeo.c |
Posted at 25/10/2024 08:33 by gb904150 The thing is, the disposable ban has been signalled for a long time.SUP have prepared for it. The likely outcome imo is that the 'disposable' companies (e.g. lost mary) will adapt products so that they are no longer considered disposable. They will continue to be sold but there will be a loophole. Once the rules are explicit they'll adapt within months. SUP's exposure to that is merely as a reseller. Their core 88vape brand is already non disposable. It could see some vapers switch across. I don't think the disposable 'ban' will result in any less vaping. Just a bit of a market shift across to different products. Non-disposables are cheaper. Disposables are more convenient but wasteful. There will be hybrids of the two. I wonder if SUP will modify 88vape to target the younger crowd that have to switch from disposables? It's a difficult line to tread if they choose to target younger vapers though. |
Posted at 24/10/2024 11:44 by actscap Surprised ban not fully priced in. Slightly earlier Implementation date impacting share price perhaps? |
Posted at 29/4/2024 11:36 by carcosa Aishah,Several academic studies have found a positive correlation specifically between founder ownership and equity returns or operating performance metrics for smaller public companies across various markets. The effect tends to be more pronounced for small versus large caps. Founders with large shareholders are statistically better as investments because companies where founders retain a significant ownership stake tend to have better share price performance on average. This is because founders' interests are more aligned with outside shareholders when they have "skin in the game." Founders with large equity stakes tend to take a longer-term view in decision making versus professional managers. This can benefit share prices over multi-year periods. For relatively small market capitalisation companies, the correlation between high founder ownership and better share price performance seems to be stronger based on available research. For example: |
Posted at 04/3/2024 12:15 by gb904150 JohnDoe23 - you are calling this right.I've added a few more. It seems there is a familiar pattern. SUP announces great results, trading volumes, profits, buybacks etc. share price adds 30%. Government threatens legislation, taxes, complication. share price loses 30%. The point is regulation, taxes and govt complication favours big players like SUP who can respond, comply and consolidate by buying up the weaker players. SUP have already done that. Tax on vapes isn't going to lead to any less vaping until taxes hit a critical point where vapes are no longer be affordable. What was that price point for a pack of cigarettes? £8? £10 But vaping is starting out such a low cost it will have zero effect. Sell price on 10ml 88vape liquid - £1. What do we think cost price is on that? 30p? So 88vape make 70p. If the govt makes it so there is 50% tax. The new RRP is £2. The govt now makes £1. 88vape (SUP) will still be making their 70p. It is the consumer who will pay the tax. Not vape manufacturers. I doubt the tax will be as hefty as that to start with. Here they suggest an extra £1.40 tax on a £4 bottle of 10ml liquid. For an extra £72 or so cost for the year. Compared to cigarettes vapes are so cheap so i think the impact is minimal and it's all for show. I think around 85% of cigarette price is tax. Back in 2015 it was 83% according to this: hxxps://news.sky.com Vape duty The same report said Mr Hunt is considering a "vaping products levy" which would be paid on imports and by manufacturers of vapes in an attempt to make the habit unaffordable for children. The tax will be specifically on the liquid in vapes, with higher duties for products with more nicotine. However, to ensure vaping remains a cheaper alternative to smoking, there will also be a one-off increase in tobacco duty, with the two measures expected to raise £500m by 2028/2029, the report said. Downing Street confirmed to Sky News that the levy is being considered "as an option". |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
