We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Plc | LSE:SUP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BDT89C08 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.00 | -1.14% | 174.00 | 178,132 | 16:35:29 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172.00 | 178.00 | 177.00 | 175.00 | 175.00 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household Appliance Stores | 221.25M | 22.43M | 0.1923 | 9.10 | 205.24M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:35:29 | UT | 1,767 | 174.00 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2024 | 13:05 | ALNC |  Supreme buys Typhoo Tea for GBP10.2 million |
| 02/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Acquisition of Typhoo Tea for £10.2 million |
| 29/11/2024 | 12:17 | ALNC | TAKING AIM: Supreme "in good hands" regardless of Typhoo Tea outcome |
| 28/11/2024 | 16:18 | ALNC | Supreme in "advanced" talks over potential acquisition of Typhoo Tea |
| 28/11/2024 | 15:11 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Potential Acquisition of Typhoo Tea |
| 26/11/2024 | 14:34 | ALNC | IN BRIEF: Supreme says annual results to be ahead of expectations |
| 26/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Half-year Results |
| 25/10/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Notice of Results & Investor Presentation |
| 14/10/2024 | 10:03 | ALNC | DIRECTOR DEALINGS: Volution and Supreme CEOs, Raspberry Pi exec sell |
| 14/10/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Supreme PLC Director/PDMR Shareholding |
Supreme (SUP) Share Charts1 Year Supreme Chart |
|
1 Month Supreme Chart |
Intraday Supreme Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2024 | 16:25 | Supreme imports floats on AIM | 1,496 |
| 21/1/2001 | 21:49 | SUPERFRAME | 2 |
| 11/1/2001 | 23:00 | SPERFRAME a Super Shell ? | - |
| 11/1/2001 | 23:00 | SUPERFRAME a Super Shell ? | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:35:29 | 174.00 | 1,767 | 3,074.58 | UT |
| 16:29:19 | 178.00 | 114 | 202.92 | O |
| 16:29:19 | 178.00 | 26 | 46.28 | O |
| 16:29:08 | 173.50 | 4,711 | 8,173.59 | O |
| 16:29:06 | 173.50 | 65 | 112.78 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 03/12/2024 08:20 by Supreme Daily Update Supreme Plc is listed in the Household Appliance Stores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SUP. The last closing price for Supreme was 176p.Supreme currently has 116,611,033 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Supreme is £204,069,308. Supreme has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 9.10. This morning SUP shares opened at 175p |
Posted at 02/12/2024 08:19 by ggplyr So its a trade and assets purchase, 7.5m in stocks and trade receivables, the good bit of working capital.The other 2.7 presumably brand/goodwill. RNS says they did 20m revenue. supreme think they can do 30% gross profit i.e. 6.7m Distribution costs in Typhoo tea's accounts were 2.3m Admin expenses were 6.2, lets assume supreme strip this down to 1m (wild guess on my part) assume very little admin costs if they are getting absorbed in current Oh base. tax at 25% PAT = 2.5m Investment so far 10.2m Payback period 4 years Return on investment 25%. Looks pretty good on paper. Risks - declining market share- current year 20m revenue, prior year 25, year before 34m. Opportunities - typhoo ice tea? The news articles all read typhoo tea "saved" / "rescued"- and they reference the 100 odd employees, but from the RNS supreme arent keeping these employees. |
Posted at 26/11/2024 11:09 by ggplyr Yes they went up in october, not all shops passed them price rise on immediately, but supreme had increased their prices to retailers from october (i questioned this through investor relations when i still saw them retailing for £1 at the end of October)Sandy thought there would be zero impact on volume following the price rise. I'm not sure i can make the investor presentation today, so if anyone could ask the question "has the 10ml liquid price increase to £1.20 impacted sales volume from the EPOS data you have access to, and how much of the 20 pence is Supreme retaining as gross profit" that would be greatly appreciated. This will feed through to GP in the second half. I dont know if retailers knowing the rise was coming ordered additional stock before it did. Lets hope not, otherwise this half just reported would have inflated sales. |
Posted at 26/11/2024 07:22 by edmonda Interim Results: "margin improvement and FY25 outlook raised" - new research report freely accessible here: For the six months to 30 September 2024, Supreme reported healthy revenue growth of +8%YoY (£113m) based on both ongoing business and the acquisition of Clearly Drinks Ltd., with (adj.) EBITDA +22%YoY at £18.5m, underpinned by gross margin improvement +299bp to 29.6%. The (adj.) EBITDA margin was 16.3%, compared to 14.5% a year earlier. The improvement in profitability underlines Supreme’s breadth of market position and depth of expertise in the distribution of a wide range of household goods. The Group notes a strong start to H2 and has issued raised FY 25 (adj.) EBITDA guidance of “at least £40 million”. With our FY25 guidance raised from £37.0m (adj.) EBITDA to £40.0m, our FY26 outlook remains unchanged, principally reflecting the full impact of the ban on disposable vapes. Our Fair Value remains 225p/share. |
Posted at 31/10/2024 14:25 by ggplyr Impact of Tax on Vaping DemandCurrent Costs • 88Vape Liquid: A user consumes 3 bottles (10ml each) per week, costing £3.60 (at £1.20 per bottle). • Smoking: An average smoker consuming 10 cigarettes a day spends about £55 per week. The cheapest brand in Tesco costs around £41.13 per week. • Rolling Tobacco: Costs about 65% of the price of cigarettes, equating to £36 per week. • 88Nic Pouches: £2.50 for 20 pouches, with moderate users consuming 3-6 pouches a day, costing between £2.62 and £5.25 per week. Projected Costs in October 2026 • Vaping: £11.52 per week. • Smoking: £60 per week. • Rolling Tobacco: £39 per week. • 88Nic Pouches: Remains between £2.62 and £5.25 per week. Analysis • Vaping Costs: Despite the price increase, vaping remains cheaper than smoking. Other brands might cost £15-£17 per week, still significantly less than smoking. • Market Dynamics: Users may seek cheaper alternatives, potentially increasing 88Vape’s market share. Some users might switch to pouches being the cheapest, though they may not be as effective as vapes in mimicking the smoking experience. • Price Sensitivity: The significant price increase from £1.20 to £3.84 per bottle might lead some vapers to consider quitting or switching back to smoking. Even more so for more expensive liquid brand could be in the region of £5.50/ 10ml. This isn’t far off the price of a cheap 10 pack of cigarettes which may have a psychological pull. • Comparative Taxation: The UK’s vape tax is moderate compared to other countries. For example, Germany taxes e-liquids at €2 per 10ml, rising to €3.20 per 10ml by 2026. However, UK cigarette prices are among the highest in Europe, more than double that in Italy and Germany, making the vape tax relatively lower in proportion. Check out this: hxxps://www.numbeo.c |
Posted at 30/10/2024 14:58 by ggplyr The tax is 2.20 per 10ml. If a pod has 2ml then the tax will be 44p.Bottled liquid will will still be the cheapest way to vape per puff. The price of 10ml is now £1.20 for info. Its that price in b&m and Iceland and will be in all shops soon. (It's up the the retailers when they increase the price but supreme are have increased the price to retailers already) |
Posted at 25/10/2024 08:33 by gb904150 The thing is, the disposable ban has been signalled for a long time.SUP have prepared for it. The likely outcome imo is that the 'disposable' companies (e.g. lost mary) will adapt products so that they are no longer considered disposable. They will continue to be sold but there will be a loophole. Once the rules are explicit they'll adapt within months. SUP's exposure to that is merely as a reseller. Their core 88vape brand is already non disposable. It could see some vapers switch across. I don't think the disposable 'ban' will result in any less vaping. Just a bit of a market shift across to different products. Non-disposables are cheaper. Disposables are more convenient but wasteful. There will be hybrids of the two. I wonder if SUP will modify 88vape to target the younger crowd that have to switch from disposables? It's a difficult line to tread if they choose to target younger vapers though. |
Posted at 24/10/2024 11:44 by actscap Surprised ban not fully priced in. Slightly earlier Implementation date impacting share price perhaps? |
Posted at 29/4/2024 11:36 by carcosa Aishah,Several academic studies have found a positive correlation specifically between founder ownership and equity returns or operating performance metrics for smaller public companies across various markets. The effect tends to be more pronounced for small versus large caps. Founders with large shareholders are statistically better as investments because companies where founders retain a significant ownership stake tend to have better share price performance on average. This is because founders' interests are more aligned with outside shareholders when they have "skin in the game." Founders with large equity stakes tend to take a longer-term view in decision making versus professional managers. This can benefit share prices over multi-year periods. For relatively small market capitalisation companies, the correlation between high founder ownership and better share price performance seems to be stronger based on available research. For example: |
Posted at 04/3/2024 12:15 by gb904150 JohnDoe23 - you are calling this right.I've added a few more. It seems there is a familiar pattern. SUP announces great results, trading volumes, profits, buybacks etc. share price adds 30%. Government threatens legislation, taxes, complication. share price loses 30%. The point is regulation, taxes and govt complication favours big players like SUP who can respond, comply and consolidate by buying up the weaker players. SUP have already done that. Tax on vapes isn't going to lead to any less vaping until taxes hit a critical point where vapes are no longer be affordable. What was that price point for a pack of cigarettes? £8? £10 But vaping is starting out such a low cost it will have zero effect. Sell price on 10ml 88vape liquid - £1. What do we think cost price is on that? 30p? So 88vape make 70p. If the govt makes it so there is 50% tax. The new RRP is £2. The govt now makes £1. 88vape (SUP) will still be making their 70p. It is the consumer who will pay the tax. Not vape manufacturers. I doubt the tax will be as hefty as that to start with. Here they suggest an extra £1.40 tax on a £4 bottle of 10ml liquid. For an extra £72 or so cost for the year. Compared to cigarettes vapes are so cheap so i think the impact is minimal and it's all for show. I think around 85% of cigarette price is tax. Back in 2015 it was 83% according to this: hxxps://news.sky.com Vape duty The same report said Mr Hunt is considering a "vaping products levy" which would be paid on imports and by manufacturers of vapes in an attempt to make the habit unaffordable for children. The tax will be specifically on the liquid in vapes, with higher duties for products with more nicotine. However, to ensure vaping remains a cheaper alternative to smoking, there will also be a one-off increase in tobacco duty, with the two measures expected to raise £500m by 2028/2029, the report said. Downing Street confirmed to Sky News that the levy is being considered "as an option". |
Posted at 14/2/2024 14:50 by adamb1978 Always very hard / impossible to link buyback to share price performance, partly because volumes arent that material and partly because there are 1000 other factors driving a share priceHowever if you look at TIG, their buyback is 10% of market cap and the share price has moved up in a market which has been soft |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
