ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

SUP Supreme Plc

172.50
-5.00 (-2.82%)
Last Updated: 09:15:36
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Supreme Plc SUP London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
-5.00 -2.82% 172.50 09:15:36
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
177.50 172.50 177.50 177.50
more quote information »
Industry Sector
SUPPORT SERVICES

Supreme SUP Dividends History

Announcement Date Type Currency Dividend Amount Ex Date Record Date Payment Date
26/11/2024InterimGBP0.01805/12/202406/12/202410/01/2025
02/07/2024FinalGBP0.03222/08/202423/08/202424/09/2024
28/11/2023InterimGBP0.01507/12/202308/12/202312/01/2024
05/07/2023FinalGBP0.02231/08/202301/09/202329/09/2023
29/11/2022InterimGBP0.00815/12/202216/12/202213/01/2023
05/07/2022FinalGBP0.03801/09/202202/09/202230/09/2022
07/12/2021InterimGBP0.02216/12/202117/12/202114/01/2022

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 06/1/2025 18:18 by scubadiverr
What's are Stocko's ranks for SUP?
Posted at 30/12/2024 09:24 by gb904150
The important point is that SUP have the resources to navigate and adhere to new regulation. The tiny vape co's that pop up from time to time don't have those resources.

More regulation will mean more consolidation. Liberty flights was a perfect example and there are loads more out there.

SUP can integrate them into their distribution platform with ease and gain several thousand new customers.

A wider ban on all vape advertising is possible but that doesn't stop existing vapers.

Amongst young people the advertising is word of mouth via other vapers. An ad ban would have limited effect.

So in summary I'd say an ad ban is pretty unlikely to happen, even if it did happen it would take a while to come in, if it came in it would have limited effect.
Posted at 29/11/2024 09:29 by adamb1978
Happy to trust SUP with this one given their prior track record.

Big brand name too
Posted at 07/11/2024 10:40 by actscap
SUP have a diverse range of revenue streams and these streams are pretty consistent. I'd be surprised if there are many other players with such a range of consistent cash generative revenues. Further entrenching Supremes ability to respond to all the changes esp relative to new entrants and smaller players
Posted at 05/11/2024 00:40 by actscap
Whatever the hit to vape earnings, long term holders can reasonably assume SUP has a nice cash engine to power growth over the foreseeable, even if this growth in vapes could flatline or start to decline at some point.
Posted at 05/11/2024 00:34 by actscap
Licensing - positive for SUP as curbs black market and rogue players. Advertising - BATS Vuse advertised on formula one, so directly effected. However, 88vape already has significant market share and hasn't done any major advertising for some time. Generic Products and shelf space - SUP already made several changes and well prepared for this. Worth noting the above falls under classic regulatory capture type moat whereby it is v difficult for new entrants to get a foothold given restrictions on advertising and prominence in store. Should deeply embed and protect the 88vape brand much like it did to incumbent tobacco firms years ago.
Posted at 25/10/2024 08:33 by gb904150
The thing is, the disposable ban has been signalled for a long time.

SUP have prepared for it.

The likely outcome imo is that the 'disposable' companies (e.g. lost mary) will adapt products so that they are no longer considered disposable.

They will continue to be sold but there will be a loophole. Once the rules are explicit they'll adapt within months.

SUP's exposure to that is merely as a reseller.

Their core 88vape brand is already non disposable. It could see some vapers switch across.

I don't think the disposable 'ban' will result in any less vaping. Just a bit of a market shift across to different products.

Non-disposables are cheaper.

Disposables are more convenient but wasteful.

There will be hybrids of the two.

I wonder if SUP will modify 88vape to target the younger crowd that have to switch from disposables? It's a difficult line to tread if they choose to target younger vapers though.
Posted at 03/7/2024 15:04 by edmonda
Supreme plc - video recording - Investor Presentation (FY Results)- 2 July 2024

Link to full video:

Sandy Chadha (CEO) and Suzanne Smith (CFO) of Supreme plc hosted an Investor Presentation covering details of their results for the year ended 31 March 2024. These included strong trading across FY24 in all divisions, and almost doubling of profitability overall.

Management highlighted record levels of cash generated from operations, and ending the year bank debt-free. The team discussed the recently-announced acquisition of Clearly Drinks, which provides product diversification and is immediately earnings enhancing. Finally, Supreme touched on the continued positive trading momentum into the first quarter of FY25, and answered a range of questions submitted from viewers.

The full video is dividend into chapters as below:
0:00:03 Introduction to Supreme and key investment highlights
0:05:39 Financial & Operation highlights
0:09:01 Vaping
0:16:43 Sports Nutrition & Wellness
0:17:56 Lighting
0:19:09 Batteries
0:20:05 Ark, Trafford Park
0:21:51 Clearly Drinks acquisition
0:26:53 Financial Summary
0:31:44 Outlook
0:32:51 Questions & Answers
Posted at 02/7/2024 06:48 by edmonda
"FY24 results generate doubled profit, record cash"

New research report (free & accessible) here:


For the year to 31 March 2024 Supreme reported revenue of £221.2m, +42%YoY, (adj.) EBITDA of £38.1m, +97%YoY and (rptd). PBT of £30.1m, +109%YoY.

Net cash from operations grew 40%YoY to £27.1m, with year-end net cash1 of £11.6m (FY23: £3.2m). (adj.) diluted EPS was 18.19p/share (ED estimate, 20.2p). We see strong performance at gross level, +55%YoY with margin improvement from 26.3% to 28.7%.

The Group has made timely preparation for the transition to traditional refillable, rechargeable e-cigarettes, allowing it to further scale its c.60 m bottle annual production volumes, or to newer pod devices. Supported by strong cash generation Supreme has maintained its strategy of acquisition in a new product area – Soft Drinks, where we expect a full year of contribution in FY26.

Supreme trades on a FY25E (adj.) EV/EBITDA 5.5x and PE of 9.1x, offers a dividend yielding 2.6% and remains highly cash-generative, as evident in the recent cash-based acquisition of Clearly Drinks for £15.0m.

Our Fair Value remains at 225p/share, still well above current levels despite recent strength.
Posted at 17/5/2024 07:24 by gb904150
Yes, valued like a tobacco stock due to regulatory risk but a much better business.

Tobacco is in decline. Taxes will see to that in the west but in emerging markets they have a more robust and longer term business.

In the west it's a dying industry that needs to diversify into NGP's and meanwhile they have to manage all the lawsuits.

Compare that to SUP which has no legacy/liability business like that. It has a vertically integrated platform that manages multiple sectors well - batteries, lighting, health (vits and supps) and vaping.

SUP have something that is very attractive to big tobacco - multiple vape brands and tens of thousands of loyal customers. Big tobacco has lots of money and needs to diversify into NGP's.

The vape sector is growing so quickly and we've just navigated the most recent regulatory risk.

The next risk is of course a Labour government who will arrive EOY 2024 and will maybe want a battle with vapers. But Labour will want/need the tax revenues and they won't want to annoy millions of voters, so they won't be able to do that much.

At a FPE of around 7 and with 3.5% divi yield I think SUP is a good long term bet.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock