Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

[bygdennis] 07/10/2016 15:47

Muckshifter, What you say about tenders isn't the case at all, The value of the tender is always considered and whether or not they're up to the task, Never mind, you lot obviously don't understand much, or you do, and treat everyone reading like idiots.

As for margin's SA already have a complete package in place with the equipment developed to cope, So the margins depend always on outlay, Those who can read already know The equipment has been dealt with, So we can assume they need to pay wages and upkeep of existing equipment. Others may not be this fortunate and we at SA know how much it costs to invest to be the best,
Reward time shouldn't be long for holders, having a strong package of services in place and as this sector is young and much progress and growth is expected to keep rising over the next decade or so.
There are always risks and problems but SA have come out of this fully intact and despite all are in a much better position than before the legal matter began.
To operate as is SA could make profits but this isn't what we are about is it? No point being here if not aiming for the possibilities on offer with a bit of hard work of course and a sweat or two, We've just come through one and hope two won't come, With the right support at the right time SA could be more than ok.

[pottermagic2310] 07/10/2016 15:22

Anybody wondering if anything is likely to 'take off' in the Wind Farm sector, particularly in the USA, now that the AK debacle has been settled & HS is a significant Shareholder in the Group ?????

[andy] 07/10/2016 15:20

Bygdennis,

"SA have a package of services accepted as the best by our government "

---

This statement is false and misleading, and you know it!

[muckshifter] 07/10/2016 14:51

Well you're a shareholder bygd, so why don't you ask them - what proportion of the work at Hinkley or the Thames estuary is carried out by drones, and what proportion by engineers / surveyors using instruments on the ground, or in the case of the Thames work, in boats also. Ask them to proportion the consequent office work into the same categories proportional to the amount of data input from each source.

PS. They don't have a "package of services accepted as the best by our government" they price jobs and win them when they are cheaper than the opposition.

[bygdennis] 07/10/2016 14:26

You are a working hard group, Always best before we get the next news, but nothing to say that means anything at all! There are problems in any business, What you lot don't want to talk about is business as it is, the potential of SA and what they have to offer in a fast growing sector rapidly expanding worldwide worth many billions over the next few years.
SA have a package of services accepted as the best by our government and have also secured important work with large companies recently, Working closely now with a University that could prove a very lucrative project in Asia among other projects they have in place, We are advised not to underestimate significance.
As you and we all know, those who see the potential of growth we can look at in recant news, It is impossible to make any definite predictions until there is confirmation, On the other hand it is easy to predict and say anything to cause doubts and confusion using past information as a guide while ignoring changes and progress made.
You don't dispute SA have the technology but so far fail to mention anything about the potential, They have the area worldwide in the right places, the facilities and expertise that give them an advantage in making financial gains. The main thing you lot ignore is what this sector is to become and how important it is in these early stages to get into the strongest position possible to cope with demand to come.
You can't do this without being prepared to make investments.
In fact as we progress and we become more aware of what is happening it would now be no surprise if SA advance faster than any anticipate or how quickly expansion could be should it be accepted that they have the qualifications and know how to make the advancements and gains possible.
All we can assume is your group having been covering these BBs for months with a completely negative overview, despite the many improvement and progress made, Merely predicting ever lower SP's using many dubious remarks, misinterpreting news to suit your campaign and now even using others shares to as a tool to cause doubt and confusion, Your objective as before seems to be .03p, You were close but missed the opportunity! Now SA are in much better position and despite your efforts to it irrelevant it isn't being ignored.
You seem to think investors here have no confidence in SA or that this sector is not rapidly expanding and is a big part of the future of the world. Of course everyone is looking for the best entry point they can get but do you imagine those who already have it will give it up because of your dubious remarks and predictions?
SA are now settled with no issues except financing future growth,
If and when a fund raising is required to make further progress it would be difficult to imagine the price being the same as the highly discounted offering as the last one when there have been good gains since?
Has there been a better time to research what SA have to offer for the future and accept what you lot desperately try to highlight is now history and that mistakes are learned from seldom repeat.
Muckshifter, You have no idea the way SA work and stuck with traditional methods it is replacing, Just like Andy and the rest, It will take time for you to be educated so carry on with your posting! SA are probably more for academics and forward thinking people and not for those who judge using the past for support.
Anyway, We continue!

[the stigologist] 07/10/2016 12:26

oh and then next year just repeat the dose but higher numbers all round (including losses) to make it look you are a 'growth' company

Sales are vanity
Profit is reality
(although even that can be fudged by conmen)

[pottermagic2310] 07/10/2016 11:02

I'm happy to simply sit this out yet again, waiting for the Fund Raise that SA have already declared will be quite necessary this quarter, see what that leads to in terms of senior/majority Shareholders, shares in issue, cash in the Bank and the share price AND what it might mean in terms of longevity of the Company, then make a decision.
I do think the Services offered and the Skills/Training arrangements already in place could lead to additional Business but whether SA can develop enough new Business to quite keen timescales, something new every Quarter perhaps(?), is the real challenge.
One event that might favour a brighter future could be an imminent announcement of 1 or more new, sizeable Contracts AHEAD of the required Fund Raise.
On that note I think an immediate GAMBLE might be necessary... otherwise, the more sensible approach would be to wait for the predictable dilution to occur, hope SA raise a few £million to sustain them well into next year and buy-in at that stage

[andy] 07/10/2016 08:56

Bygennis,

"It will be difficult for you lot to understand as when posting it is clear you know little about SA or this new technology that is changing the world and it might pay you all to find out what is happening"


---

Nobody is disuputing the technology, it's the accounts that are the problem!

You seem to have difficulty in understanding that a company burning around $150,000 per month with little money left has a problem, which it will need to rectify by issuing yet more shares in the very near future.

At what price do you think they can get the next placing away at?

I would suggest you buy a basic accounting book so you can grasp the real problem here.

[bygdennis] 07/10/2016 08:13

Hi Group, Hey Stig, Your sulk is obvious as things are not going the way you negative lot enjoyed while keeping these threads in a depressing state, I have warned that many positives have been ignored, overwritten and covered and now SA are settled and ready to move on in this fast expanding sector.
Those like me who have followed have found more than you imagined, Have got in on these lows never expected even by SA to drop anywhere below 1P as we have been told.
I also warned you no one is always right but you won't accept this fact, Your latest try using Hulsey's shares as a tool to bring doubt is clever but why would he even consider selling at this time especially! Of course it is possible but this is his sector, passionate about it if you read up and will appreciate what is to come.
It will be difficult for you lot to understand as when posting it is clear you know little about SA or this new technology that is changing the world and it might pay you all to find out what is happening, The news is full of it and is not to keep being ignored as you have for month now!

[andy] 07/10/2016 07:00

off topic

steamy aka nicky aka rogthepodge,

Had you read Shareprophets and heeded the warnings it would have saved you from, losses on Quindell, and Slater and and Gordon!


Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean you should just ignore their message, he highlighted the issues long before the market caught on, and Slater and Gordon clearly didn't do their DD as well as Tom otherwise they would have seen what he saw!

Funnily enough had they read this BB it would have saved them a lot of money!

[rogthepodge] 07/10/2016 00:36

hahahahaha! you are clearly trying to drum up a few clicks for Smear Profits

[kemche] 07/10/2016 00:07

Nicky, When did Shareprophets identify this as a wrong'un?

[rogthepodge] 06/10/2016 23:24

who HASN'T he fallen out with? lol

[rogthepodge] 06/10/2016 22:53

I'm positive that this little cabal (could be just one or two!) hunt as a pack in support of Share Prophet's latest smear

[andy] 06/10/2016 22:10

bygdennis6 Oct '16 - 14:21 - 1074 of 1078 0 0
Andy! you're not worth even reading anymore, All you do is make silly statements.
You carry on posting mate! maybe someone will think you're saying something but in general you're not worth the effort.

-------

Which is BB speak that you can't answer the questions posed and try to deflect away from that fact by attempting to demean the person asking the questions.

Standard stuff on ADVFN when you're losing the argument, well done for confirming you can't discuss the company properly.

You say you're a shareholder, yet cannot answer the basic question about the margin that SA make on a contract!

Truly amazing, but reading some of your other posts, not really that amazing after all....

[andy] 06/10/2016 22:05

I'll make some "positive" comments about AERO!

I'm positive the share price is going to fall in the near term.

I'm positive there is going to be a discounted placing very soon.

I'm positive whatever happens BygDennis will proclaim it's brilliant and everything is moving forward spiffingly.

I'm positive there will be more commissioned reports.

[rogthepodge] 06/10/2016 21:34

Yes 'Stigologist' I have always found 'IOnlyPostAfterBBM' to be the epitome of a gentleman

[bygdennis] 06/10/2016 20:59

Makes sense i suppose to go out with a last gasp negative comment pilotov,
Seems you realise there will be no going back as we move on to better things, hope you do as well as i have here,, Lost some, gained some and now in a good position, It's a shame you won't enjoy the smoother ride back as this sector gains momentum, As you say, It's been fun, Good luck!