Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sibir Energy | LSE:SBE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B04M0Q71 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 174.75 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/12/2008 20:38 | For the benefit of the principle shareholder. | tpain | |
03/12/2008 20:38 | And why do they need to do that it is profitable and cash generative even at present oil prices and lower. | coco | |
03/12/2008 20:34 | It is very cheap if sibir don't sell their main assets at very cheap prices. | tpain | |
03/12/2008 20:26 | I need more margin,do you think SBE will buy my half finished shed? Just to keep the shareholder structure ,of course. | p@ | |
03/12/2008 20:21 | Prudence Broon, I did sell my whole holding having been in at the 8p share level( 80p after consolidation. I did sell out £2 short of the high price so missed out a bit of extra profit. Still not bad. Came back in recently and added again to day. I have met the Russian shareholders and Henry on a number of occassions and sincerely believe that they will show me another good profit run. I like to know the people in the companies that I invest in and I do with SBE. Yes I remember Ron. | davron8 | |
03/12/2008 20:19 | He didnt even use lubricant.... | maxk | |
03/12/2008 20:18 | His property deals did make a lot of money yes...but they are now losing a load which SBE shareholders now bought at inflated prices. There is no positive slant on this. | tpain | |
03/12/2008 20:09 | You may find one day that management have decided to sell them on the cheap, because they need the funds. And it just may be a coincidence that they go to some dodgy Russian company. It happened before with abramovich so why cant it happen again. Management have demostrated that they are only running the company in the best interests of one person, and so it is not so unrealistic to think they will continue to do this. Cheap assets sales to him may be the next step. | tpain | |
03/12/2008 20:09 | COCO Пот | loverat | |
03/12/2008 20:05 | Why not Tpain explain why the assets are not safe | coco | |
03/12/2008 20:03 | ha. 'great confidence in the CEO'. How the hell can you say that after recent events. The companies assets are no longer secure. In the long run it is cheap...as long as it keeps its current assets however they are just not safe. | tpain | |
03/12/2008 20:00 | Sold out in Dec 2006. Last posted Jun 2007 - but have continued to follow SBE's progress. My sympathies Guys. Banj, "if you're still in SBE" trust you'll understand that those sympathies don't extend to your good self. Good luck to all others who have been well and truly shafted. | relko | |
03/12/2008 20:00 | You should have cashed your chips in long ago Dave, why on earth are you still holding? Remember RON? | prudence broon | |
03/12/2008 19:53 | Quite a shock to see the price drop like a brick. For me its a chance to add to my holding at a very low price of 39pence. Since 2002 I have been a shareholder and have great confidence in the CEO. This is a time to take the long term view for investing in Sibir and wait to see a large share price increase as the credit crunch is reduced and trade recovers. The crude oil price will recover as the Arabs will want their pound of flesh so a barrel of oil will again be priced nearer to 100 dollars a barrel. Some forecasters suggest prices may go as high as 200 dollars by the end of next year. Mr Cameron is right to support the two big Russian shareholders who have been good supporters of the company in the past during difficult times. If Henry states thate the value of the properties is good value in the present down turn then I'll accept his advice and support him. | davron8 | |
03/12/2008 19:53 | This is - one born everyday - PMSL | coco | |
03/12/2008 19:38 | mug punters | this is bust | |
03/12/2008 19:31 | Here a view from the Russian press. Goo luck to all - although must admit the usual bunch of extremists - both long and short... MOSCOW, December 3 (RIA Novosti) - Oil firm Sibir Energy will buy real estate assets worth $340 million from Russian entrepreneur Shalva Chigirinsky, including the Russia Tower project in the Moscow City business center, the company said on Wednesday. The construction of the Russia Tower, which on completion is set to be the eighth-tallest building in the world, was recently halted after the developer came up against financing problems amid the global credit crunch. Sibir Energy will pay Chigirinsky $127 million, and take on $213 million of the entrepreneur's debt. Chigirinsky's real estate assets to be purchased by Sibir Energy also include an A-class office building in central Moscow; a multi-functional office complex in Mitino, northwest Moscow; the projects of the New Holland artificial triangular island and the Passage luxury retail arcade in St. Petersburg; the Tea Factory office and residential compound in Irkutsk in East Siberia; land sites covering over 400 hectares in Russia's westernmost exclave of Kaliningrad; and 118 hectares in central Russia. Sibir will request a general meeting of its shareholders to approve the acquisitions, the company said. The acquisition of a 50% stake in the Russia Tower in the Moscow City business center from Chigirinsky will cost Sibir Energy $48.5 million, the statement said, adding that an independent estimate put the project's 50% stake at $57.7 million. Sibir Energy said it would have to increase its fixed assets to complete the construction of the Russia Tower, but does not intend to proceed with the construction "until the market conditions improve." Sibir Energy will spend a minimal sum of $9 million on the project in 2009, the statement said. | seconduser | |
03/12/2008 19:30 | I wonder what the alternative would have been if they had said no. Doesn't take much to realise that SBE could have found themselves really screwed over (not that they haven't been) in Russia to the extent of having it all 'taken' away! | bungeetrader |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions