Sefton Resources Share Discussion Threads

[cyan] 07/12/2015 13:40

Well , well, well, guess what? LSE has reinstated the SER thread.
No doubt some will say that it was just a technical issue. I say 'hogwash' . When the site was down I tried to search for CJ's avatar, "Simon Templar"; guess what? , his posts had all been removed. There was no such member.
When I searched other regular SER posters , they were still there.

Templar's posts are back to be reviewed Now. nice one!

Looks like someone's thought better of getting involved in a cover up.

[jellyman2] 07/12/2015 10:13

They are still on main servers memory

[andy] 07/12/2015 00:15

cyan,

Interesting comments about posts being deleted on LSE Chat.

It just goes to show the lengths dishonest people will go to cover their tracks.....

[cyan] 06/12/2015 22:13

I viewed 10 seconds of that video and wanted to throw up. What a conman. How can people still lap up his drivel.

[elcapital] 06/12/2015 17:33

....a £35 a night bed and breakfast.,,,,,,,,,,,

[andy] 06/12/2015 17:20

Le_c,

"Chrisoil is about to buy up London from his bedroom at his mum and dads house?"


Now then, it's not a 'house',as you very well know!

It's either a 'castle' or Guesthouse, depending upon your own individual definition of the name for a modest Bed & Breakfast establishment atop a hillside near Malvern!

[cyan] 06/12/2015 12:45

Andy., Further evidence of a possible cover-up on LSE. Try to search for California Joes avatars there. "Simon Templar" has been completely deleted so his history of 'inaccurate' posts can not be found. Other SER posters comments about SER and ST can be found when you go to 'home' and search the 'members' box.
Cover-up suggests guilty conscience and something to hide. Too many involved in SER have the habit of deleting 'awkward' tweets and posts.

[andy] 05/12/2015 13:45

Cyan,

My guess is they were.

Interesting as ADVFN can be very tardy about removing things from their own site!

[cyan] 05/12/2015 12:08

Hi ELcapital.
Firms with tax losses can be attractive when they collapse. Have had a disaster with TRAP. That was taken over by a private company and is now JOG.
TRAP had £12.5 million of usable tax losses a little cash some licenses with discoveries and a claim for £1 million against a large oil company. Also had some oil experience people .JOG has a planned strategy.
See ;


Its AIM listing was , of course, valuable to the previously private JOG.
Unfortunately when you consider SER dispassionately one will not find anything worthy of interest to another company; imo.

Late yesterday on the LSE SER board Ben Turney posted about his proposed legal actions against persons claiming they had a nomad.
This morning I note that the whole thread has been removed by LSE. Ummmmm

Werent ADVFN looking to take over LSE? Were they leaned on?

[elcapital] 05/12/2015 10:43

I wasnt having a go tomrob, you are correct. But I remember a very heavy loss of mine in the hundreds of thousands when I was 25, and I hoped the 50m tax losses would see an offer, as I had been told, but nothing ever came of it.

[tomrob] 04/12/2015 16:28

EL, My point is that in Sefton's case the tax losses being spoken of aren't there in the first place.

Stigologist, Except of course that Sefton isn't one of those choices. It's lost its AIM listing and its pretty clear from the noises being made from within the new team that it's not coming back.

[the stigologist] 04/12/2015 16:12

given there have been so many zeroes on AIM this year, anyone looking for a shell with tax losses will be spoilt for choice

its a buyers market not a sellers one

[elcapital] 04/12/2015 16:05

I have found these situations with tax losses a waste of time, although they say its worth 10p in the pound....until you come to sell it!

[tomrob] 04/12/2015 15:59

I note that there has been talk on LSE of the tax losses within Sefton representing an attraction for potential investors seeking a vehicle to invest in the sector.

It's highly unlikely that there is significant value there given that the majority of historic losses rested with the TEG USA subsidiary which was sold to Hawker.

Any other US losses that might be available to set against tax rest within TEG Midcontinent and TEG Transmission which they hope to sell.

If anyone really wanted to make use of those losses they would have to be investing in assets within the US.

Sefton itself is a BVI corporation which has a zero corporation tax although all of its trading activities up to the start of this year have been in the US and rest within one or other of the subsidiaries. As I understand it there are no historic (ie from before the start of this year) tax losses available from trading activity within the UK.

There will of course be losses related to the expenditure on the various due diligence exercises and administrative costs this year but we don't yet know how the structure for those operations was established.

See page 19 of the Annual report

[dbno] 04/12/2015 10:15

Anyone got an accurate list of major shareholders as of today, please?

[alfredpal] 03/12/2015 00:49

CYAN

Totally agree with you.

LSE clown JAS123456 will have nowhere to make further adoring posts about CJ/KK.How sad.

JAS has lost £800 but CJ is the biggest loser as he owns 73m shares.

Poor old JAS you have to feel sorry for him. He liked carrying out medical assessments on other posters. Total idiot.

LOL