Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 15:27

LOL ........

Bermuda ... again please

""""For sure though they'll know far more about biotech and AIM investing than any of us """"

is that why they went into administration ? because they knew what they where doing

OK

[gooosed] 18/3/2019 15:25

BS - thanks for posting CF link.

[bermudashorts] 18/3/2019 15:23

lol - well it's a nice thought but if that were the case I think they would have kept the 5m Scancell shares and offloaded something else! For sure though they'll know far more about biotech and AIM investing than any of us and so it is some comfort that they have held despite the share price performance.

[oldnotwise] 18/3/2019 15:09

Berm
Yep agree with you there.
I guess the CF managers have persuaded Garraway of their abilities (irrespective of the performance in the last couple of years).
Here's a thought...
What if ....
There's something that the Analysts know that we don't????????
Again, that's a lighthearted comment that isn't supposed to be taken seriously.
Would be good though wouldn't it?
AIM(not very considered)O....
Hehe
ATB
Anyone wnat to complain about that "What if"? :-)

[bermudashorts] 18/3/2019 15:01

ONW

We'll obviously have to wait and see, but IMO it perhaps offers more hope if it is confirmed that David Crawford and Ade Roberts are moving across and will continue to manage the fund. The fact that they bought the Scancell stock in the first place and apart from the recent sale have continued to hold despite the falling share price suggests that they see potential here. Certainly a better scenario than a completely new fund manager re-evaluating all portfolio companies afresh.

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:53

you are just to confusing ... ONW

One day Mr angry ONW posts how dire we are

the next

"""Let's hope whatever the outcome the Scancell investment blossoms sooner rather than later so that everyone will want some shares!!"""

[oldnotwise] 18/3/2019 14:50

Berm,
Interestingly the second report didn't seem to mention the Scancell holding reduction, seems we can't get publicity whatever we do...!!
PLEASE before anyone comes back on this it wasn't a serious comment...
AIMO
ATB

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:47

But i thought you said the BOD was incompetent and the share price won't recover ONW

have you now U turned ?

Your description ... In Capitals ..

BUT THE BOD CAN'T COMMERCIALISE SUFFICIENT TO CONDUCT THE TRIALS FOR EVEN THE MAJOR PROPORTION OF OUR PRODUCTS AND THE SP'S AT AN ALL TIME LOW WHILST LIQUIDITY'S BURNING AWAY"

[oldnotwise] 18/3/2019 14:45

Berm, that makes complete sense! :-)
So hopefully the overhang may melt gently into history.... fingers crossed...
ATB

[oldnotwise] 18/3/2019 14:35

Berm, thanks for that, interesting. Not sure about the move to Garraway, question of interpretation I guess. I read it as a reference to CF's managers rather than their transfer with the funds to the new Management company.
However I'm sure we'll find out IDC.
Let's hope whatever the outcome the Scancell investment blossoms sooner rather than later so that everyone will want some shares!!
ATB

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:33

Gazza

the fact that you are holding .. means the majority of what i have written is agreeable

even bermuda would not dispute that

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:31

ONW .. everyone on the lse always considered you as pedantic .. how has that changed ?

you seem today to be posting from this Righteous point of view because you have blithering idiots like lozan around you that gives you some sense of respectability in respect to their posts .. from that respect i agree your Head is above the average

but it's a pretty low bar

[gazza] 18/3/2019 14:29

I guess you are used to your normal flock who if they believe one thing you say they believe EVERYTHING you say.

[gazza] 18/3/2019 14:28

Inan,

"penny post gazza …
i did not see the point of it ... apart from one upmanship with lozan "

Oh I see! Just because I agreed with one of your statements after 6 years and then agreed with Lozan that you cannot have a reasonable debate with you. Well I'm afraid you can't have a reasonable debate with you despite the efforts of numerous people over a number of years.

I CAN believe there is a disconnect between IP and share price AND say you are incapable of normal adult conversation WITHOUT CONFLICT.

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:06

anyway bermuda seems to have run off the BB again

leaving his muppets to try and smooth the passage for a safe exit

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 14:04

penny post gazza ...

i did not see the point of it ... apart from one upmanship with lozan

[gazza] 18/3/2019 13:59

Inan,


" Gazza understood it ....... but today is conflicted"

Why am I conflicted, I stand by my Friday post on the topic of share price and IP 100%
I would suspect that the majority on here are in agreement.

Where's the "conflict"?

[inanaco] 18/3/2019 13:22

10acious

Gazza understood it ....... but today is conflicted

his recent post

Gazza - 17 Mar 2019 - 14:15:27 - 20773 of 20826 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP
Old,
They have IP, trial data and bags of POTENTIAL. Just because Scancell haven’t been able to commercialise the assets doesn’t mean a company with enough cash to put behind it wouldn’t be able to.

I had to agree with Inan re the disconnect between share price and IP. The current share price is determined by the relatively minuscule trades of an unrepresentative proportion of the investor base. No company could buy up all the shares for 5.5p. There are plenty of us that would not contemplate selling at such a low figure.

As Inan says, £100m is punt money to some of these big companies, so we might see 22p.