We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.63 | -6.60% | 8.92 | 9.10 | 9.50 | 9.55 | 9.30 | 9.55 | 186,473 | 16:35:13 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.21 | 86.29M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
18/3/2019 09:36 | Panama, it's sort of surreal isn't it? Bizarre place that.....but not good for the concept of free speech, seems like there's more posts removed than left up. Strikes me a rather odd, shouldn't the ringleaders be removed, not just the posts. It would help if there was a fathomable Posting Policy, but it seems to change from day to day... I think it's just great how the gang all piles in on anything they don't like.... There's even identifiable stereotypes who arrive at (what look like) preordained times if the "opponent" isn't shut down quickly... Bit like Good cop/Bad cop....... Hehe For me the best bit's when they start to fall out with each other.... ATB | oldnotwise | |
18/3/2019 09:14 | ONW, yes Tommy and Knowlesi have brought a touch of reality to the Happy Clappers in the last couple of weeks. They really don't like it with C7 physically threatening Knowlesi, not the first time he has done that. | panama7 | |
18/3/2019 08:43 | Loz, sort of connected... :-) I see Tommy Flowers has cracked it on LSE, start posting V early in the morning.... Hehe, ATB | oldnotwise | |
18/3/2019 08:33 | Good morning Each - Once again, I see numerous people trying to hold 'normal' conversations, enter 'normal' debate, try to engage in 'normal' exchange in Alternative points of Views... with inane'n'co. When will the 'penny drop', that you CAN'T | the real lozan | |
18/3/2019 08:07 | I see the spread's tight again, my platform 5.5p/5.55p. ATB | oldnotwise | |
17/3/2019 18:26 | Ivy i have explained the risk at raising at this level well ref EGM the posts i have done cover it all... you posted """"But I am not happy as I could have twice as many shares if I had bought at this price"""" timing ........ it's the luck of the draw on the day etc etc | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 18:07 | It is your choice to respond or not.I was only seeking to engage and not dictate but no matter. I won’t sell this level either and like you value the IP much higher.But I am not happy as I could have twice as many shares if I had bought at this price,I don’t like being well underwater,even though I can happily wait for many more years and I recognise the risks of having to raise at a low share price Anyway it may be a big Easter Bunny out of the hat may be the only thing that makes us all happy | ivyspivey | |
17/3/2019 17:47 | No Ivy .. just because you ask i don't have to reply ... you ask "am i happy with the share price .. "" Don't really care chap ... low share price = buy it has benefits but not if you want to sell I hold for deals based on how I value the IP ... How you value it ? or the share price i really don't care because i would not sell at this level so i am not concerned the share price is at this level .. as i explained to Gazza he understood why can't you ? | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 17:41 | Once again Inanaco several of us give you the opportunity to debate without any personal attacks but you continue to avoid answering any of our questions/ respond to irrelevant focus on the minutiae of the science/make oblique references which no one else understands and plenty other stuff rather than just respond in a reasonable way. You really don’t prove anything whereas you would earn much more respect if you engaged with people in a rationale way rather than constantly take an opposing view on everything and to everyone. I know I will get the usual dismissive response from you like sell it all.Well as BS says that is a decision for us as individuals at our time of choosing. You claim we are all moaners when we imo just pose reasonable questions of the BOD. As you refuse to answer my question of are you happy with the current share price I can only presume that with twice as many shares as me and a much higher average you must be feeling even more u happy than I am. If on the other hand you are happy with current state of affairs then you must be in a minority on one | ivyspivey | |
17/3/2019 17:19 | not arguing with Knowlesi .. he is a BUYER of scancell ... i proved it sorry you have issues ... better luck next time | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 17:08 | ONW if provenge was so fantastic why is it not available on the NHS ? hxxps://www.sps.nhs. | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 17:03 | Bermuda I'm afraid logic (or often the truth) seems to have no part of Inanacos' world. If he's losing an argument anything's pulled into the arena.... and I mean anything to deflect. Why? It's simple he's so far away from the real world (IMO) that I really don't think he's capable of "owning up" when cornered. In fact I think he genuinely believes he's always right. At least that's what i've noticed over the last seven years or so.... Sad really, but I'm just grateful that I do know when I should 'fess up. Never mind, I've certainly got better things to do. I should have known better.. :-) ATB | oldnotwise | |
17/3/2019 17:03 | can you please confirm that The NHS has approved Provenge ? | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 17:00 | Nope, I got the point perfectly thanks. Trash another drug with the aim of giving the impression of validating your valuation for Scancell. | bermudashorts | |
17/3/2019 16:50 | provenge approved value of dendroen went to $7.5 billion scancell macp .. £20m .... i think you have missed the point | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 16:48 | has Nice approved it ? | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 16:40 | The reason you won't answer my question is because you can't - Scancell haven't run any randomised trials, so you can't tell me the overall survival for the patients with tumour in situ. That's the difference between a drug that has been through phase III trials and received FDA approval and a phase IIa candidate and precisely why you can't make comparisons. That is the point I have been trying to make. | bermudashorts | |
17/3/2019 16:30 | but you have implied you are an expert on provenge why do you now need my input of SCIB1 the issue with scancells data you cannot calculate an overall survival average as the majority are still alive .. your post does not make sense | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 16:25 | well perhaps you can tell me what you think Scancell's efficacy is then, what is the increase in overall survival for the 15 SCIB1 melanoma patients with cancer in situ? | bermudashorts | |
17/3/2019 16:21 | bermudashorts Scancell is aiming higher without spending $1.2 billion which AIM may have issue with so if Scancell efficacy was only 20% i would start adding a far higher risk element to the trials ... from a "Walk in the park" to ... maybe | inanaco | |
17/3/2019 16:18 | bermuda """ On the one hand you tell us that you're an expert """ never seen that post ? ... it's more about degree's of ignorance on the subject some are more ignorant that others the expert can only be Lindy .. | inanaco |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions