Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[gazza] 21/3/2019 11:47

surely the opposite of "happy clappers" is "GLOOMY moaners" ?

and I'm still waiting ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh.....
still waiting

[inanaco] 21/3/2019 10:48

No Agema

But we have to give the "happy moaners " space to moan

rest of us wait the RNS

[torquayfan] 21/3/2019 10:37

P7. I'm Happy and Dapper not as you say. I see the point - let's hope before you have the chance to grandstand at the AGM, BoD will have banked something of a non-dilutive nature.

Again, buy sell hold up to you, but myself, if I didn't think the science was fantastic, I wouldn't be here. Apparently, the Swedish Society of Oncology agree about the science. And many others.

[agema] 21/3/2019 10:27

Somebody sold 540,000 shares. Anyone admitting to it.? Not Inan doing another runner is it.Lol.

[panama7] 21/3/2019 10:25

TF, "3 Patented platforms in Oncology". Yes 3 Patented platforms that after 7 years have failed to commercialise one single deal. If this Science is so fantastic as you and the Happy clappers believe it to be , then that seriously ask questions of a BOD who have failed to get one single revenue generating deal and can only raise money at ever decreasing levels. If you think the BOD shouldn't be challenged on this kore fool you. When you invest money in a Company the least you should expect is that the money is treated with respect something the BOD have failed to do for all of us.

[oldnotwise] 21/3/2019 09:36

Tf
Thks appreciate the reply!
As to bunnies, your neighbours' have assets that work, but look what a lack of effective management of those assets can achieve... Hehe. (Sorry, couldn't resist :-/)
There is a commercial spinoff there though....
Fibonacci numbers again.... :-)
AIMO
ATB

[gazza] 21/3/2019 09:28

tosh, second that

Old, agree, it is the commercial exploitation of the science that is underperforming.

[torquayfan] 21/3/2019 09:27

ONW - thanks for your reply - fair enough.

(P7 can look after himself methinks - having read his withering criticisms of BoD for some years). I agreed with P7 about the remuneration issue last year.

Reasons for the slow commercial progress as you highlight - hard to say - but cancer vaccines seem to be back in the news now anyway. The exponential growth of the science over the years has been a wonder and maybe a distraction too.

Of course, criticism is essential and can be healthy.

BTW please don't mention Bunnies - our neighbours got 4 as pets just 8 months ago and now have 50+ ! Maybe Scancell can do the same with good news LOL

Must go now ATB

[tosh123] 21/3/2019 09:18

ONW,
a great narrative that many, will im sure , wholeheartedly endorse.

[oldnotwise] 21/3/2019 08:53

TF
Have to take issue with your 20964.
When originally investing in Scancell I'm sure like many here, I was impressed by the parsimonious approach of the BOD who had taken a massively interesting set of research results and converted results into what was then a marketable product base which looked more than encouraging for an early sale to "the highest bidder".
The BOD was confident of its ability to sell the company at the end of a successful Phase 2 trial of SCBIB1, and not only that it was only going to be about 18 months away from early 2012 (when a great many invested here).
No arguments about the BOD then!
However Moditope got discovered and (for whatever reasons) screwed the Scancell's plans to sell the company.
Still the BOD was supported by the investor base.
Then SCIB was unsaleable and many claims for Scancell's value were made.
Then Share issues began as the cost of administering the larger portfolioed company against a background of implied Jam tomorrow from the BOD spokespersons.
Still the IP looked extraordinary (in a good way)!
Then more cash raisers against a steadily falling share price but Significantly enhanced IP.
Then changes to the BOD and new commercially directed "High Office" people were bought in and predictions were made (USA etc).
More funds raisd at lower share price
Then BOD remuneration massively increased BUT against a background of rhetoric from BOD saying DATA is REQUIRED to sell our IP.
HOW MANY PRODUCTS DO WE HAVE?
HOW MANY TRIALS ARE UNDERWAY TO GET THE DATA WE NEED?
So some here would say the BOD are not doing the best for the Shareholders... That can be changed.
what cannot be changed is the IP (unless trisls disprove the claims for the IP) so; ,

Why cannot people be invested (for the IP) but still be critical of the BOD (however fair or unfair that might be)?

I believe the Binary choice of stick with it or sell is to misunderstand the situation we now find ourselevs in.

That's why the outlook here has, IMO changed from WHEN we monetise to IF we monetise, hence for my part the HOPE of Bunnies appearing (Hopefully sooner rather than later).
No-one's criticising the Science, but many are questioning the commercial management of that science whist staying invested and HOPING!
AIMO
ATB

[torquayfan] 21/3/2019 08:52

P7 asserts re. faith in Scancell, there is 'nothing to back it up'.
I disagree and mentioned 3 patented platforms of science in oncology.

I have no Mentor and you are making mischief. BFN

[gazza] 21/3/2019 08:10

TF, no. Investors invest in companies on the basis of their income (or potential income), underlying assets and market opportunity. If an investor felt the bod were mismanaging those assets or not realising their full potential they will campaign to get them to perform better or get them removed.

It happens all the time, it’s called business.
What they don’t do is write off their cash and walk away.

I know you (and your mentor) campaign vigorously for a shareholder base who will put up and shut up. It ain’t gonna happen.

[torquayfan] 21/3/2019 07:50

Gazza that's not sanctimonious at all - (that's your territory).

P7 asserts re. faith in Scancell, there is 'nothing to back it up'.
I disagree and mentioned 3 patented platforms of science in oncology.

P7 obviously has no faith in BoD and this has long been the case - if I felt the same I wouldn't be invested.

I have no Master and you are making mischief.

[10acious] 21/3/2019 07:27

Edit Durrant...

[gazza] 21/3/2019 07:26

"I'd ask why you hold Scancell at all ?"Probably the same reason you do. I bought on the promise of a return in multiples of the going price. Since then, the share has dropped 50 - 100% depending on your buy in price. The only choice is to hold on and hope. To suggest people should not have bought or worse, sell out, is extremely sanctimonious. You get more like your master every day.

[bermudashorts] 21/3/2019 07:26

Good to see Lindy Durrant receive recognition from her peers - congratulations to her!!

[10acious] 21/3/2019 07:25

Congratulations to professor Lindy Durante.Let's hope she will be further rewarded with a successful advance out of the laboratory and into the market place with her discoveries!

[torquayfan] 21/3/2019 01:52

P7 - it's not ramping to have faith and belief in Scancell.
If you feel so very badly, I'd ask why you hold Scancell at all ?
If I felt vitriolic about the BoD as you seem to, I would have sold out long ago.

MMMmmmm - ''nothing to back it up'' - how about 3 patented oncology platforms ?
And I'll post where and as I choose - not needing your permission. ATB

[inanaco] 20/3/2019 19:32

I am sure that the support of a thug like you is welcome Tosh ..

Bermuda must feel so proud

indeed he has come out so many times to support your science based mouse post's

or has he ?

[tosh123] 20/3/2019 18:07

Unlike you, Berm would probably have no interest in acknowledging the accolade quite rightfully bestowed on him, because unlike you, he is known to be modest and grounded. He doesn't need to try and garner support, because he already has it.

It is only you that scours the BB's trying to sound important with your copy and paste rubbish, desperately attempting to gain support and recognition... its pathetic

And for the record, Berm was not elevated to a superior position, HE'S ALWAYS BEEN THERE.

[inanaco] 20/3/2019 16:24

excellent ..

like i said i am absolutely sure that as you have stated, Elevation of Bermuda to the status of superior would put Bermuda in a very awkward position

what i would like is a post from Bermuda agreeing with you ...

which i suspect will not be forthcoming and i would not expect one

what may be forthcoming is that bermuda and myself are at least capable of discussing the science sensibility at a level you could not achieve, which means you have very little rights to assess or make the statement you have made, after all the science clearly is gibberish to you, you have stated as such

[the real lozan] 20/3/2019 16:19

"Oresence" -
A descriptive word, from the High German, to describe 'the ignorant practice of ...
'Sticking one's *Ore-In*... where such is not wanted, or asked for'.