Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[gazza] 04/9/2018 08:19

Thanks goosed. Emphasises how important funding is to the whole trial scenario.

[gooosed] 04/9/2018 07:51

Final Results time fast approaching.

A paragraph from last years concluding forecast :

"Outlook

The Company has recently published robust survival data for SCIB1 showing median observation times in excess of five years in resected patients. These results, together with a successful IND submission to the FDA, will put the Company in a good position to embark upon a US Phase 2 study of SCIB1 in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor. The commencement of such a study is dependent upon the timing and outcome of the IND submission plus the Company's ability to raise sufficient funds to enable the study to be fully funded."

[gazza] 04/9/2018 07:51

Anyway, back to SCLP. It would appear the predicted lull has well and truly taken hold. I wonder if there is a storm on the horizon to get us out of the doldrums?

[gazza] 04/9/2018 07:44

Just to make it clear:I AM following my own advice.

[gazza] 04/9/2018 07:42

TF, well I suspect your opinion doesn't carry much weight.You have chosen not to acknowledge the problem here, you have instead chosen to attack individuals rather than contribute to the debate. Finally, try and work out the significance (or difference) of "the OTHER thread" and "HERE".

[torquayfan] 04/9/2018 03:35

Gazza / Ruck - your posts yesterday - a very poor defence of your hypocrisy IMO.

Coming back to your 751 on the other thread - ''If someone inadvertently posts the latter here, (i.e. mindless name-calling and one-upmanship), perhaps we could respectfully remind them and NOT respond in a like manner.''

As my 17487, maybe follow your own advice ?

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 23:25

Counsel. Not council. If you aren?t sure then use a different word.

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 23:25

Given SCLP rather uniquely has an entire advfn board dedicated to these ?alternative? views, and the point that there has evidently been far more sellers than buyers over the last 3 years, I am left wondering how ?alternative? these views really are :)

[the real lozan] 03/9/2018 20:38

*ViewS*. Not *View*. If you aren’t sure then use a different word.

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 20:33

Counsel. Not council. If you aren't sure then use a different word.

[drdobson1] 03/9/2018 19:15

The Astooties just accept the alternative view has been more profitable than the view widely held ny members of the MFFF.
Der Leader on that site being the biggest Goon of all

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 18:59

Given SCLP rather uniquely has an entire advfn board dedicated to this "alternative" view, and the point that there has evidently been far more sellers than buyers over the last 3 years, I am left wondering how "alternative" this view really is :)

[drdobson1] 03/9/2018 18:00

Tosh absolutely nail on Head.
I have 9/9 and all aimed at INE person.
You expertly point out why this us the case with the vast majority on here.
If the said individual stayed away we can all CONcentrste on balanced informative posts which discuss both SCience and Commercial u like the MFFF which seems to extinguish any alternative vuews

[inanaco] 03/9/2018 16:31

Gazza .... laid the wreath but was not involved

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 16:28

Yes. Determining instigator quite important. Quite selective on the day too. I wonder how Thursday looks..

[gazza] 03/9/2018 16:22

wiggy, apologies, it was an oversight, not a deliberate omission:

The name calling was started by Inan in his 12:06 post having been baited by tosh ealier that morning. Instead of taking issue with Tosh, Inan launched into everyone (as per usual)

Tosh, I didn't want to state the obvious, the figures say it all really.

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 16:11

Well done gaz, you have ignored half of your own process."TF, I think you need to review the thread and:1. Determine the instigator 2. Keep a tally of who is name calling and publish the results"

[gazza] 03/9/2018 15:30

It would appear TF is not interested in the facts.
For the record, the Friday "debate" breaks down as follows:

Tosh - 1 post, 1 personal/derogatory
Dr D - 9 posts, 9 personal/derogatory
Lozan - 5 posts, 1 personal/derogatory
Gazza - 11 posts, 2 personal/derogatory
Inan - 22 posts, 16 personal/derogatory

So perhaps TF could address his remarks to the main antagonist or shut up.

[gazza] 03/9/2018 10:52

wiggy, come on, at least give TF some time to wriggle out of it.

[wigwammer] 03/9/2018 08:57

wriggle,wriggle,flap,flap,flounder lol

[gazza] 03/9/2018 08:09

TF, I think you need to review the thread and:1. Determine the instigator 2. Keep a tally of who is name calling and publish the results, not 10% of the results.Come back when you have your facts straight.

[torquayfan] 03/9/2018 02:55

Gazza / Ruck aptly named . .

You should take a bow M8 - your post 26/4/2018, 751 of 761 on the Richard G Dawson thread :-

''I have revived this thread. Perhaps we could use this one to post about Scancell, the science, the financials, the IP, our different views and opinions and leave the other thread for the exclusive use of those who only want to engage in mindless name-calling and one-upmanship. If someone inadvertently posts the latter here, perhaps we could respectfully remind them and NOT respond in a like manner. I can't be the only one who gets fed up trawling through pages of mindless drivel for the occasional sensible post. What do you think?''

Ah ! That didn't work so NOW, maybe follow your own advice ?

But Richard G Dawson - let down again. ATB