We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.60 | 9.40 | 9.80 | 9.60 | 9.38 | 9.60 | 148,854 | 08:00:21 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.44 | 89.07M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/12/2017 16:55 | Berm Sadly I'm not overly concerned, it's simply the poster's ability to completely flip from one stance... No risk safe as drinking water etc. To the unbelievable (and inaccurate) statement quoted above... whilst implying that there's noone else who could possibly understand... 'Spect there'll be a reason though... hehe :-) Makes me smile really... But Hey, Christmas is coming!!! AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
13/12/2017 16:44 | Can't see all of the posts over there ONW, but I assume he means Moditope is still pre-clinical. As for SCIB I would say that it is as proven as it can possibly be in 35 patients!! | bermudashorts | |
13/12/2017 16:23 | Difficult to get my head round this, but I've just been lectured in the other place by Inanaco that, "the science is not proven ONW in fact the majority is only just getting to the clinical stage," Why did I think that it couldn't fail... no risk etc? Oh well, at least there's a germ of reality beginning to infiltrate what I thought was an impenetrable mass!!!! Hehe ATB | oldnotwise | |
13/12/2017 15:17 | M F F F = same old, same old . Has ANYONE [along with HIS SCAMMING mates} EVER turned MORE potential investors AWAY from ANY single share than InSANE-cur ??? . IF SO....by putting potential investors OFF this share = apart from HIS LIES and FALSE CLAIMS, when examined, IF NOT, by means of HIS obnoxious EGO....InSANE-CUR ..... suffers from..... InSANE-CUR, HAS at least, SAVED those 'potential investors' quite a substantial amount of money. | the real lozan | |
13/12/2017 12:16 | Goy Zoe Muth.... Never heard her before.... now rapidly compiling a collection!!!! Stonking antidote to the (various) markets! Great stuff Thanks ATB | oldnotwise | |
13/12/2017 11:55 | No Torq, doesn't apply to any specific company; it was a generic point. Difficult to deny that AIM Companies are populated by mountebanks and purveyors of quack financial nostrums though, across all sectors. Libel laws prevent further elucidation. | goyathlay | |
13/12/2017 10:32 | Goy - ''AIM companies are replete with shysters and unsavouries managing them ; still, ride along with them for a quick profit and then dump them''. But surely you are not arguing that this applies to Scancell ? In which case - don't get your point really. Thanks for the tune - you're a bit of a country fan aren't you ? | torquayfan | |
13/12/2017 09:44 | RG is now following this chap : | gooosed | |
12/12/2017 22:05 | Thanks for replies, and for music Goy. | bermudashorts | |
12/12/2017 21:30 | or when Churchill tried to explain that the British Electoral System had two parties. "One party is much better" the old tyrant replied. Randomised schmandomised. Pah. That will all come later, after the shareholders have been sodomised. | goyathlay | |
12/12/2017 20:44 | 'Who can argue with a p of 0.0109 with an n of 7?? !!!' Mmmmm, bloke at the back with his hand in the air maybe? Not randomised, not blinded, comparison against 'matched cases'??? Why do I recall that famous Georgian, Stalin? "I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how." | supernumerary | |
12/12/2017 19:21 | Of course anyone can play - all opinions welcome. Only reason for asking was that AFAIK Mikethebike4 isn't invested in either so was just interested in what impression he's left with from the VAL RNS. | bermudashorts | |
12/12/2017 17:45 | Berm which company do you mean by 'their' ? | mikethebike4 | |
12/12/2017 16:14 | What do you think of their trial results Mike? | bermudashorts | |
12/12/2017 16:03 | look at Valirx funny, I once thought Scancell was going to do this sort of thing ! what amazes me is that to my laymans mind the Scancell product is much better | mikethebike4 | |
10/12/2017 14:05 | "In short, this report indicates that small and mid-stage companies will continue to see high valuations, easy access to cash, and a friendly IPO market — as long as unforeseeable macroeconomic factors don’t tank the market. Large-cap companies, however, may see shrinking valuations, affordable price tags, and more significant consolidation (should tax reform go their way)." "easy access to cash" - hmmmmm. | gooosed | |
08/12/2017 13:49 | goy - assume you mean Boom as in me rather than boom? | bermudashorts |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions