Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 12:34

A quick reminder of a current partners presentation tomorrow ;



(found by boom)

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 12:22

ah OK thanks for that. So you accept that a deal on any one of the products provides external validation, you simply disagree on the most likely product to cut the first deal.

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 11:31

OK thanks for the chance to explain.

My recollection of the AGM recording and later comments on the LSE BB, was to the effect that JC was talking about a drive to raise the Scancell 'profile' again in the USA when we had some impliedly, shortly to be achieved, 'external validation' to offer in discussion.

SCIB2 - Commencement of the trial is some time away. It is part of the Immunobody platform belonging to Scancell and not 'external' atm of course.

IMHO and the impression gained from LSE comments, it seemed that the source of 'external' validation was hopefully to be the 1st 'deal', or a later 'deal', or possibly, SCLP's credibility having been raised by a handsome indication of award of Patents for Moditope. Both would be as referred to by JC, 'external' validations of Scancell's status IMO.

Whilst conceivably one day SCIB2 might be the subject of external interest and provide validation, I'd be surprised to see it as the next and imminent validation that JC is hoping for to add to the armoury of CH and RG in 2018. Maybe the semantics threw me a little - 'provide' is not the right word - maybe 'attract' external validation would describe it better. SCIB2 might one day be the source of a deal but I see many other more likely and imminent weapons in the Scancell armoury.

Thanks again for replying to my question. ATB

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 11:28

goosed - thanks for that, will have a listen

rHatton, yes.

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 10:52

May be of interest to some.

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 10:44

TF

What is your issue with the statement "I just wonder whether SCB2 could provide external validations" ?

Genuine question, why couldn't/shouldn't SCIB2 be the product that brings the 'external validation' talked about by RG and JC?

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 10:31

C7 I just noticed your earlier allegation of 'revenge', (daily). Nonsense.
Absolutely none of this is personal at all.

Yesterday I politely pointed out your florid exaggeration on LSE 03.53, ''thirty howling posters ready to slit his throat'' about the reception to Bluerose's posts years ago - I never remember even ONE poster writing or implying such.

Further, you posed the following wisdom - And ''I just wonder whether SCB2 could provide "external validations"" for the Immunabody platform as well''.

I asked - ''As SCIB 2 is part OF the Immunobody platform - how would that work ? Externally ?''. Fair question.

Surely that is 'rational' discussion and part of what a Forum is about. That is not being 'torn apart'. Oh, unless you are unable to take any criticism at all ?
In which case, 'Man up' !


I enjoyed re-reading your 'Testimonial' Feb 2017 to Inanaco as reposted 12685 :-

''Morning TF, Yes I enjoyed reminding myself of so much good stuff. In fact i have enjoyed reading all of Inanacos posts again. They just make you think outside the box''.

I'd echo that. Now relax and TCOY.

[tosh123] 30/11/2017 08:52

Nappy continues to be outed ... thanks C7 for further proof of what a despicable individual he is... YUCK !
Horrible little man.

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 07:56

Inanaco - a comment of yours has been brought to my attention :

"Otherwise any party could get caught up in this, Boom, Rats, bibio etc ....."

Do not involve me in your exchanges. Tread very carefully. Back on filter.

[gooosed] 29/11/2017 20:41

Much has been made of the collaboration with ALCF (Adario Lung Cancer Foundation) one of the leading Lung Cancer PAG's . . . .

Now we are informed that any SCIB2 trial is likely to be in Europe . . . ?

A few possibilities of course could explain the latest change from Scancell . . . . RG will hopefully be in a position to explain before long.

[torquayfan] 29/11/2017 20:13

Inxsight. Beautifully argued.
Get lost. Filtered.

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 19:29

C7, but your posting with intent, and that is a dangerous game to play considering how many others your in direct contact with, that may feel any posting to this level ie giving out details of private meetings etc, could compromise who they are etc. Not only that i know your history, why would you want all that in open discussion ? i have never threatened you in all these discussions the strongest word i have used is garbage. Check my history ....

[the real lozan] 29/11/2017 19:23

12689 -
That from an insight that ramped this as a BUY -Oct 15th - at circa 14.25p
.
Still, probably RIGHT about Tarquin Eetup
GUFFAW

[the real lozan] 29/11/2017 19:03

"actually Nappy" With ALL the times YOU have been 'exposed / caught-out / PROVEN' to have LIED / posted FALSE CLAIMS / misleading punters with YOUR, and Tarquin Eetup's 'phoney trHYPE'... the 'red herring' aimed at Elsie having a "very poor memory" OR... YOU trying to involve others = "Boom, Rats, bibio etc ....." does NOT in any way,
FOOL ANYONE.
The VAST majority, and YOUR past history of LIES ... ONLY leaves folks to believe Elsie, and come to the REALITY.... that YOU are ....The GUILTY party
{ Not that YOU haven't heard that before }

[chelsea35] 29/11/2017 18:49

Inanaco, your first reply didn"t deny it. Only in your third post. Really not bothered, I know the truth. BTW I didn"t give out any personal details, no mention of who, just the way you were.

No, it should never have got this bad, but the pair of you have really pushed it.

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 18:22

actually Loz, it was the other way round, C7's posted suggested a buy, actually the party in question was holding. C7's memory of events is very poor, and as that party can post if needed, and is still in regular contact with me, C7 really needs to get a grip of giving out personal details. Otherwise any party could get caught up in this, Boom, Rats, bibio etc .....

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 18:17

Your problem C7 ... is you have history

SCLPRE: Repost from Inanaco . . .21 Feb '17
Morning TF, Yes I enjoyed reminding myself of so much good stuff. In fact i have enjoyed reading all of Inanacos posts again. They just make you think outside the box, in fact we have existed in a very negative one for too long now. IMHO

[the real lozan] 29/11/2017 17:49

Elsie - Good post
" So still not all the story, it gets worse but yes i wish i had listened earlier."
The "ALL the story" would save others from being LURED into having their 'pockets picked'
.
As I HAVE ALWAYS SAID, nothing wrong with investing here - based on one's own reasoning.
However- There IS something VERY WRONG in deliberately MISLEADING the unwary ... FOR YEARS... to LURE folks into their SCAM

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 17:48

C7

Unfortunately i paid 41p and 37p before knowing HIM

exactly ..

suggest rest your case ...

[chelsea35] 29/11/2017 17:31

Lozan, well i have bought 50k between 10.08 and 12.33, was 11.7 this morning, took 11.8125 and 11.85. Possibly one of my better decisions having seen the RG video (no not the Frankfurt one lol). Unfortunately i paid 41p and 37p before knowing HIM. Sussed him out a few years back after seeing him piling on the pressure for a PI to throw £30/£40k into the share at mid 30s, in my home. Having told the person not to HE stormed out and drove home. HE had earlier told me to put all my savings in at 35p just for a couple of weeks, which of course i didn"t. I kept my silence for a long time until by association i had enough.

Hence the revenge from Inane and Tarquin, as witnessed again today on LSE, and probably every day for a year, then came the bombardment about me manipulating the BB, from the very same people who witnessed what i went through. Can it get lower than that?? So still not all the story, it gets worse but yes i wish i had listened earlier. Whilst down like most ok with my holding now........after all wouldn"t have missed the last five years!!! An education to behold.

Anyway, nothing new to you guys, it"s why i came here rather humbly. Will gladly leave him singing and dancing a £1 is on the cards, i hope it does, but i would prefer to sing and dance once it leaves 12p!!!!

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 16:43

what ever your taking tosh ... it does work

[tosh123] 29/11/2017 16:36

Really ????
Dear oh dear.... how simple can you be ?
You honestly do continue to make yourself look more and more stupid.

[inanaco] 29/11/2017 16:24

what are you on about ?

[tosh123] 29/11/2017 16:16

So which is it Ineptico... are you just plain stupid, or are you a coward ?
My money is on both !