We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.15 | -1.62% | 9.10 | 8.70 | 9.50 | 9.25 | 9.10 | 9.25 | 321,812 | 14:04:44 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.05 | 84.43M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
23/11/2017 14:49 | so go on gazza ... Loz has finally woken up after the lunch time binge .. """I do come here for a bit of friendly chit chat""" possible discussions Cold Front moving down over Southern France ... Johns death on Peaky Blinders... Hammonds Budget .. | inanaco | |
23/11/2017 14:36 | Not looking for any of that ... told you how it works here for the money. and it works like this.... if you make a statement that i cannot reason against then your statement becomes the lead policy which i then support ...... this has not changed since 2012/13 ... indeed Smiler off you go, find me a negative. the Shareprice is not relevant as all i am trying to show is it's cheap relative to the IP. lozan/Tosh, Mr W cannot explain why the IP has a lower value to the share price ... thus all the posts can be dismissed as not relevant, if they could and i could not reason against it, i would sell ... Clearly a different case arises between Buy and Hold for an event and trading in and out for short term gains, but that is personal to the investor which really is not a point worth discussing as No conclusion will be ever drawn from it as its not linked to IP only market sentiment on any particular day ... Problem you have Gazza, your understanding is such that .. general Chit Chat is all you can do ... leaving you to discuss the latest news, Mr W swimming against the tide, Loz with is 26kw stove ... etc etc ... Ie nothing to do with Scancell .. LOL | inanaco | |
23/11/2017 14:15 | Inan, I'm afraid you have a very overblown view of yourself in all areas - science, investment strategy and communication. You seem to think that the B.B. is some sort of debating society where you can showcase your (imaginary) skills. You have sought to gather disciples for yourself but are now down to one faithful follower.If you think anyone comes here for financial advice you are very much mistaken. If you think anyone comes for financial advice from YOU then you are deluded.So on that basis, yes, I do come here for a bit of friendly chit chat - something you don't do as you are incapable of either chit chat or being friendly. | gazza | |
23/11/2017 13:37 | Jealous of who ? If you take Toshs point of view i have lost a fortune, yet no evidence exists of that. Your take on Scancell results in an agreement with mine. "potential" hence your still in. Lozans take is a never ending fall ...while at the same time allowing for a rise ie stuck between the gravity effect of two neutron stars Mr W take is all about me ... nothing to do with scancell, it seems my posting to him to find the negative in scancell back in 2013/14 and his failure to find that, has resulted in long term damage to his health opps! To be jealous requires at least one party to have something i aspire to ... Problem is this Scancell is the Science as only Boom would attempt to convey that on the BB's to any sort of level that would prompt me into a discussion, the only contender would be Boom in that respect as i would then aspire to that understanding, but would i be jealous of Boom ? or take it like i do as a point of interest to learn if Boom had it right ? From memory Puritas and myself never had any difficulty with discussions. Is Boom irritation due to boom not accepting anybody's right to an opinion ??? how strange would that be If your talking about Following lets assume Tosh/Mr W/ lozan were correct on everything ... then why no following ? would you follow Tosh ? or Lozan ... or would you rather use the BB to make friends not money. What i have seen from your posts, your not going out of your way to have friendly chit chats. So clearly your here for that bit of info that adds value to your investment .. would Tosh Provide that or Lozan ? hardly hence you don't engage them. Problem is when you actually reason the arguments Flaws appear ... Take C7 ... does his strength as a poster come from his sound knowledge or the backing of his friends ? The first has an outcome that is good for the BB, the second does not as it involves manipulation of the evidence to portray sound knowledge make up your own mind, it matters not to me, as not one of your posts has ever added value to my thoughts on the science or would dictate how i would invest. here for the money, and to impress me you would have to have serious knowledge, so sorry Pal ... you don't | inanaco | |
23/11/2017 12:33 | Inan, I never bought up terror YOU did!!!Unbelievable! Well it's not actually, pretty par for course coming from you. As for your other comments, you come across very bitter and dare I say, jealous? | gazza | |
23/11/2017 12:26 | Gazza its not about Terror its about your support of the general tone of this BB .. and your empowering of C7 to incite . Tosh .... freebies with an average, always "Right" with losses Mr W ... Pretty sure i don't go out of my way to paint a picture as you have suggested, indeed you seem to have elevated your own Profession of Bob Cat driver/radioactive scanner man to that of a Dr, not sure who has the EGO complex here Lozan ... Happy in the warmth with Snug Jo in retirement. Victor Meldrew all fun and games as usual ... | inanaco | |
23/11/2017 08:53 | Its brilliant isn't it Lozan... The blokes Ego knows no bounds hahaha. " Intellectual capacity "... you couldn't make this stuff up. As i have said many times before, if he had another brain cell, it would still be lonely. | tosh123 | |
23/11/2017 07:54 | Inan, 12487.Why didn't you include terror's repulsive post that prompted mine? That would have given some balance. It was pretty bad and I was not alone in condemning it strongly. | gazza | |
23/11/2017 06:27 | " So go on, prove me wrong."You have been proven wrong consistently for the last 5 years you narcissistic moron | wanderer1210_0 | |
23/11/2017 01:36 | Gazza Post on Standards ......... shows what a complete and utter hypocrite Gazza is .. Gazza - 04 May 2017 - 22:23:39 - 9166 of 12487 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP Terror, no one, repeat no one, is going to shut up when it comes to standing up for common decency. Every point of fact you state may (or may not) be correct but there are standards of behaviour that are simply unacceptable. Once you cross this line, which you clearly have, you loose all credibility and respect. Just for the record, you lost any credibility and respect a long time ago but today has just underlined it. Pitiful. If you have a modicum of decency you will banish yourself from this board. I suspect you haven't and therefore you won't. So go on, prove me wrong. | inanaco | |
23/11/2017 01:29 | C7 a simple reply back in April would have sufficed, Not On Opiates, its not about me being wrong, because the post asked the question of you !!! """""""" Maybe you should explain exactly the medication your taking""""" so you twist again in your reply .... nanaco 12475, might as well answer that post. Wrong again, on all counts. In April 2017 I was off the the three opiates for a good year, so basically your saying all your bad mouthing was not opiate driven .. maybe that is worse. PS ... baiting Boom .... what is he a Fish ? you think i am using my intellectual capacity to undermine him ? crazy .. he posts he is out of his depth so steps out of the debate which i accepted. I certainly did not belittle him ... I never said i was LD's Peer .. yet another ridiculous statement not sure who is baiting who here ... LOL and is it worth responding at all .. C7 Best of luck with it | inanaco | |
22/11/2017 22:11 | A typically honest, heartfelt and sincere post Chelsea.In fairness to TF I think he was a victim of predictive text when he said icon. I think he meant I Con. | gazza | |
22/11/2017 20:29 | Inanaco 12475, might as well answer that post. Wrong again, on all counts. In April 2017 I was off the the three opiates for a good year, coming off them was the hardest few months i went through. Your post was a way of deflecting and distorting my posts to you as you and TF have done all year by accusing me of manipulating the BB, demeaning every word i uttered, and was very personal. I had never uttered a word about the battles i had with my medication , simply expressed my gratitude to the oncologist who beat all the odds, rather than dwell on the anger i felt at what they were up to. It was you inanaco that told the BB I was in IC for many months with pneumonia, written off four times and diagnosed with lung cancer too with a short prognosis. I remember receiving 48 messages of best wishes when i returned to the ward. It was you that saw me in hospital, you who saw me to the AGM and you who saw the life squeezed out of me in coming back home. TF came to visit me two years running, must have really hated me the first time and you who stayed over five times meeting people i had known for a while. And then the pair of you posted as you did after i asked you to stop being so rude to everybody. Which continues to this very day. I posted last year i was tumour free, which was true, in the hope it stopped being mentioned. I didn"t post i was cancer free, as i wasn"t. That is for my next scans in January not a day i long for. I really hope this will be the last post ever on the subject from anybody i just wanted to say what i did, and it wasn"t directed at Lozan, just wanted to ex[plain what i hadn"t after a very innocent comment. I said from day one here what i came over to say, TF followed so did ONW. I didn"t come here to row, just wanted rid of LSE. Not a single person gave me grief except you and TF. The LSE BB is now finished, just you baiting boom at every opportunity and Tarquin calling you an ICON!!! with YOU becoming LDs PEER!!! Good grief. Roses lying and even researcher has returned. Everybody else is locked in Twitter to keep you out. Time for time out from me, anti biotics 24/7 , infections constant but happy in my own sanctuary with a handful of PIs i talk to. One day you and TF will realise how low you sank with me , G-d help you. ATVB, Keep punching!! | chelsea35 | |
22/11/2017 15:32 | Violets are blue!! | chelsea35 | |
22/11/2017 15:01 | "And guess who ramped it up to sell...............a Care to explain ??? | the real lozan | |
22/11/2017 14:56 | And guess who ramped it up to sell...............a | chelsea35 | |
22/11/2017 14:41 | Serotonin production from a 10% rise .... and quite a decent budget .... | inanaco | |
22/11/2017 13:14 | Lord knows what medication your on then MrR, Prolixin? | wanderer1210_0 | |
22/11/2017 13:00 | C7 I appreciate that your medication played apart over the last few months regarding overdosing on opiates ... However i did try and discover what was going on at that time. SCLPC726 Apr '17 Maybe you should explain exactly the medication your taking, only its very powerful stuff, and that is why folks should take this all with a pinch of salt and let it be .... Maybe now you can appreciate that sometimes posting as direct as i do, could have actually helped you if you had replied in a constructive way. ATB | inanaco | |
22/11/2017 12:45 | I'm flat out in my cab waiting for the tide to turn, currently nudging 4 degrees C | wanderer1210_0 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions