We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.15 | -1.62% | 9.10 | 8.70 | 9.50 | 9.25 | 9.10 | 9.25 | 321,812 | 14:04:44 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.05 | 84.43M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/11/2017 09:52 | I think that's why he is called 'all-in Onan' after he recklessly bent down to pick up a pube-latticed Imperial Leather in the shower drain @ Broadmoor. | goyathlay | |
22/11/2017 09:43 | Some might say a return visit would appear to be = "ON THE CARDS" | the real lozan | |
22/11/2017 09:41 | Loz, unfortunately, his time inside doesn't appear to have had any lasting effect. HMP's attempts at rehabilitation have clearly failed. The idiot is still just as egotistical and uneducated as he was prior to his holiday at Her Majesties pleasure. The only solace is that he will probably be going back inside at some stage in the near future, hopefully for a lot longer this time. | tosh123 | |
22/11/2017 09:14 | Elsie - Your CON viction results from you having been naive and inexperienced. but at least you are trying - in an HONEST, but still error-strewn way, to do something in order to recover your LOST money. der TEA LEAF's CON viction carried a 'jail sentence' | the real lozan | |
22/11/2017 09:01 | Ineptico, you're an OAF . Who the hell are you to give advise on investments ??? Your " all eggs in one basket strategy " is absolutely flawed and contradicts every experts opinion. You're out of the money, big time, you're a loser , simple as that .... As for NIPT, of course it was a risk, but it was also somewhat binary, if they won the case, then the share price would have trebled at least, if it lost ( as indeed it did ) then the share price was going to get hurt in the short term..its not rocket science, however, the fundamentals of the company remain robust, and it provides a crucial service in a growing area. Also, because my cash at risk was calculated on worst case scenario, and my exposure is limited, i can afford to ride out this storm.. Unlike SCLP, NIPT is making money right now, and its anticipated to turn a profit in 2018. Also, being part of a balanced portfolio, what i lose on NIPT, is more than made up for by the likes of SOLG - ARS - IMM - VOD - BP - BOOM and many more. Your posting history speaks for itself... 100% WRONG on every count... I suggest that people read back through your years of uninformed, uneducated rubbish, you could not have been more wrong if you had tried, and you still have the audacity to try and give investment advice...hahahaha. Classic. | tosh123 | |
22/11/2017 08:58 | Lozan............ ""Elsie Has a different kind of CON viction to his name, than der TEA LEAF."" Pray tell me more. | chelsea35 | |
22/11/2017 08:19 | Some would suggest - following inan's FAILED CLAIMS -The latter would suggest it is nearer to IF EVER, rather than 9 months. | the real lozan | |
22/11/2017 08:09 | Inan, you haven't really addresses the question. 3 months ago you predicted £6 by July 2019. I assume that prediction was based on the facts available at the time and a number of assumptions. So my question is: has your prediction changed in any way? (Sp or date). If so, what are the changed facts and assumptions that has caused you to revise either share price or date? I'm just trying to get a realistic estimate of what the share price might be in 9 months (I personally think 50p is possible depending on news, funding, deals) and a realistic target date for £6 (which I also think is possible on completion of successful trials and commercialisation (or sale of) of moditope)The latter I would suggest is nearer to 9 years than 9 months. | gazza | |
22/11/2017 08:04 | "Lozan as ever bets both ways on his posts, "what if" .." Not at all- Lozan as ever posts, "what DIDN'T / what ISN'T " .. As opposed to SCAMMERS who bring NOTHING but RAMPING, leading unwary punters to LOSSES As volumes show, the 'Jam Tomorrow' has 'gone off'. Most normal folks would be EMBARRASSED to have been PROVEN to hold such a record of FAILURE, of that of the BUY, BUY, BUY CLUB. . "at least C7 Has the conviction" ...Indeed, but, Elsie Has a different kind of CON viction to his name, than der TEA LEAF. | the real lozan | |
22/11/2017 06:26 | "I still have not found a share that comes even close to this potential."Then cash in every bit of capital you can get your hands in (legally) and go all in, sound familiar? Or are you excepting risk of having all your eggs in one basket? Put you money where your big gob is, at least C7 as the conviction to do this where as you, your just a 2 bob bell end etc etc | wanderer1210_0 | |
22/11/2017 01:56 | In the meantime, this vice like grip on the bid by the MMs offers little to any hopes of not breaking back into 10p land. Prof Lindy being away until early December would suggest to me news if any is still a while away. Hard to imagine any major new Moditope news will occur in her absence. Just a 10k buy moved the ask and bid up today, the share price reacting to each and every trade. Wonder with even another 60k sells where we go tomorrow. A very weak bounce back from 10.50 as demonstrated by the MMs managing the bid still. Another buying opportunity coming up!!! | chelsea35 | |
21/11/2017 23:05 | "time frames have changed Lozan .." Exactly Time frames have HAD to be changed...PUSHED BACK by YOU... COS.. they NEVER become a REALITY "£1 a share On the Cards today" = NEVER happened IN FACT... NOTHING YOU have 'CLAIMED' ... HAS become a REALITY Quite the opposite, if *WE* remind ourselves of YOUR "NO RISK here" /" FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here" and many other of YOUR deliberate LIES. . "nobody ever asks for your opinion .." Nobody NEEDS to ask my opinion... They ONLY need to look back at YOURS to see 'What they have / WILL lead to = LOSSES. | the real lozan | |
21/11/2017 23:01 | based around the trial start dates really, until we actually get confirmed Kick of dates how can we predict some sort of result's timetable ... Ichor, with the Immunobody programs New Gun estimated Del. Mid Nov .... 21st today however that does not mean a bunch of Validations of commercial interest in both programs could not be a serious driver of value as a kick off point. Its the sheer number of targets on moditope that could add significant value. These Epitopes could be worth fortunes in the correct recipe ... Like i said before Immunobody has limits ie Epitope discovery, that is "not" Scancells area of research, as its always been about the Platform which is why others are attempting the prostate version etc. This is why i pay so much attention from an investment point of view to leverage of scale ... I still have not found a share that comes even close to this potential. Lozan as ever bets both ways on his posts, "what if" .. LOL however the Garbage infill is unreadable .. | inanaco | |
21/11/2017 22:19 | Inan, what's your revised timeframe for £6 now? | gazza | |
21/11/2017 22:18 | nipt: the risks were known but many chose to ignore themSound familiar?Very easy to pontificate AFTER the event. | gazza | |
21/11/2017 21:34 | "just like Oil drilling" of all the exploration rigs I've been on, never known of oil being drilled. Those where the days though, privy to well test info, kerching | wanderer1210_0 | |
21/11/2017 20:00 | time frames have changed Lozan ... i suggest you refer to scancells latest estimates then apply that to my numbers ... but again your not actually saying anything and nobody ever asks for your opinion .. | inanaco | |
21/11/2017 19:52 | re my post = There ARE those who might like to see 'Alternative Views / Suggestions / Thoughts' which give 'reasoned BALANCE' as to how their investment / potential investment' here are doing /or may fair... in REALITY. As opposed to a CON stant stream of FALSE CLAIMS /LIES and excuses that 'make up' a picture of 'how or why this 'investment' SHOULD perform / SHOULD have performed' BUT DIDN'T / ISN'T . Some folks might like to see reasoned views from folks who have been PTOVEN to have been RIGHT. Rather than, being misked by those who have been PROVEN to have been 100% WRONG . Does ANYONE...REALLY share with nany,the trHYPE, that this share, {currently 11.25p} - as HE CLAIMS ...WILL be £6 a share in 'now circa' 9 months ??? | the real lozan | |
21/11/2017 19:39 | BS - Ha ha . . . . . sorry for the mental assault on the ears ! | gooosed | |
21/11/2017 19:01 | Inanaco, I wasn't comparing Scancell to NIPT - I was simply commenting on your post about those with a balanced portfolio on NIPT taking a hit. Just very odd that you would single out those with a balanced portfolio as if it somehow validates your 'eggs all in one basket' views when actually the complete opposite is true. It highlights the danger of the eggs in one basket position. However, since you brought it up, have you considered that many NIPT holders would have bought in before Illumina filed their patent infringement suit? They would have bought when NIPT was a promising bio with exciting tech and David Evans as Chairman. As for your comment "so your "Utterly disagree" has failed, due to lack of reasoning".......... | bermudashorts | |
21/11/2017 18:27 | Point i am trying to make boom I would not suggest all in with NIPT ... because of that win/lose scenario which cannot be quantified without a judge | inanaco | |
21/11/2017 18:16 | Exactly ..... its a personal thing . however you cannot compare NIPT with SCLP from a single investment view point NIPT was carrying a "legal" risk of failure just like Oil drilling .. hitting commercial grade to failure to hit commercial grade. thus carrying way high risk of a direct Hit to value. so your "Utterly disagree" has failed, due to lack of reasoning it also not taken into account the important element ... leverage of scale Scancell has that phase 2 already in the bag which IMHO carries a way higher value than the current share price on its own. | inanaco | |
21/11/2017 18:15 | Gooosed - oh no! You've taken my mind to somewhere it really doesn't want to be. Can't get that music out of my head now. | bermudashorts |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions