Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh123] 24/7/2018 14:38

Afternoon Wig,
fortunately our caped crusader appears to be at it again on the other place, by claiming that the £20 mill from the Grand challenge would go onto our balance sheet, which anyone with the slightest appreciation of reality, will know is just not the case.
Its things like this that upset people. He truly is a menace.

It looks like Hotw1ngs has put him right again though, good on her.
She is most certainly a more than adequate adversary... In fact its almost compulsive viewing when she takes the idiot on, head to head.

But it does go to emphasise the reaction that the liar generates with his lies.

Im not making excuses for myself, but like Hotw1ings, i feel duty bound to show the idiot up, for what he is, which is an uneducated liar.

Anyway, thats got that off my chest.
Apologies.

[wigwammer] 24/7/2018 12:46

There are regular readers here. Most will have at least half a brain cell dedicated to recall. They know. You got it wrong :)

[the real lozan] 24/7/2018 12:38

"That the company needed funding so buyers should be cautious. "
Were those PROVEN to be VALID or NOT ???
Were those PROVEN to have been posted when the S P was HIGHER than 10p or NOT ???
Are you having a 'little difficulty' in producing ANY EVIDENCE that shows ANYWHERE
" What EXACTLY were 'My "warnings at 10p" to which you 'refer' ???"
IF there ACTUALLY existed, posts of mine, which showed " What EXACTLY were 'My "warnings at 10p" to which you 'refer' ... EVER existed, I am sure you would have 'backed-up' your CLAIMS, by REVEALING them to *US ALL* ???
BUT, IF they NEVER existed = This would be seen as 'standard trHYPER tactics' ???"
.
It IS perhaps, this 'tendancy to invent LIES, FALSE CLAIMS, and attribute them to others' by certain 'devotees' that 'open-minded, reasoned folks see /take-on-board, which has led folks to FULLY understand ...WHY = "The Inanaco camp has diminished"
UNTRUSTWORTHY { but = very predictable}

[wigwammer] 24/7/2018 12:13

That the company needed funding so buyers should be cautious. The funding was eventually achieved at a 20% premium to my average entry price. You got it wrong :)

[the real lozan] 24/7/2018 11:50

And would you care to remind *US ALL*... What EXACTLY were 'My "warnings at 10p" to which you 'refer' ???

[wigwammer] 24/7/2018 11:44

And it's my pleasure to remind everyone of your warnings at 10p :)

[the real lozan] 24/7/2018 11:41

"Thanks to those who do contribute relevant material :)' -
No need to 'thank me'
... it's 'my pleasure' to "contribute relevant material"

[wigwammer] 24/7/2018 11:33

Tosh - I agree that balance is entirely appropriate, though I accept that the reality on most boards is that the readers are generally people who own the shares, probably understand the risks, but want to enjoy the process. What has been allowed to develop here is a situation that day in day out, a certain individual posts the same concern, the same gripe against another poster, the same self congratulatory nonsense. I placed him on filter many months ago, but saw on Sunday that he had responded with two posts immediately after my own. So i unfiltered him and saw he had lifted my words and altered them to suit his own strange ends. Most of the time I haven't got a clue what he is talking about - I think he is trying to say he was buying the shares at 10p - though all I can recall at the time were his warnings about fund raising (which was consequently done at 12p - a 20% premium). It sounds like there has been a clash of egos here at some point and consequently, if you lift the angst contained in the various messages and look at the relevant content beneath, there is very little of interest about SCLP. I take the point about using the filter - as mentioned, the individual in question was on it - unfortunately the filter doesn't prevent people lifting your words and contorting them. Thanks to those who do contribute relevant material :)

[drdobson1] 24/7/2018 11:12

Once again on MFFF PLUm gets it wrong ove4 Grand Challenge Prize.
He says it Will appear on Balance Sheet.Well he is right about the BS just Bull S@@@.
He is as Good at Naths as a certain Diane Abbott.
He nebe had good spooling as his Maths is as bad as his spilling and we know when it comes to science his only success was blowing up his house with his first chemistry set.
He LIES about Guatanteed winning of Prize and Money goes to SCLP,about £6 a share and about NO RIDzk buy buy scam tryhpe.
He is a dangerous menance

[the real lozan] 24/7/2018 11:09

M F F F -
ANOTHER EGO 'skirmish' brewing ???

[drdobson1] 24/7/2018 11:01

Tosh.Nail on the Head.
If baNANA never posted anywhere would be a Major Step forward.
He CONtributes absolutely nothing and Creates Ensiin and argument which does not encourage I dependent and I formative debate
I only post here to Stop him spreading LIES and in response to how Dangerous the Idiot is

[the real lozan] 24/7/2018 10:38

With that 'line-of-self-CONfessed 'questionable logic' ',*WE ALL* CAN see your problem
"Hmm. I found it rather profitable to ignore you at 10p, given that the shares consequently rose toward 20p"
So - *WE ALL* CAN take-it, that 'for some reason' it was deemed ="rather profitable to ignore you at 10p" = NOT BUY @ 10p
Thus- missing the PROFIT = "given that the shares consequently rose toward 20p " that SELLING @ "towards 20p" provided ???
.
A rather ODD approach to 'wealth management'... but, in keeping with others-'sitting on LOSSES'
.
Still, to each their own,

[tosh123] 24/7/2018 10:30

Wig,
i think that Loz and a few other posters are merely attempting to provide a bit of balance to certain claims made by certain people.

You are 100% right that a run down of the risks can be gleaned from the prospectus, as well as looking at the histories of other small Bio's in similar positions, but in that one statement, you somewhat highlight one of the major concerns with a certain poster, in that you recognise the fact that there are always risks.

Unfortunately the BB is plagued by someone making outrageous claims of there being no risk, and even more outlandish claims of this share being £6 with in the next couple of weeks.
He is demented and very dangerous.
A lot of people only post in response to his nonsense, as to let the idiot have a free reign ( like he appears to on the other place ) would be detrimental to anyone with half a brain.

I dont think anyone minds people having differing points of view, but when these clearly flawed statements are made, and then proclaimed to be facts, the whole dynamic of the BB changes.

The simple solution to all of this would be to ban the idiot from any public BB / forum.
He is totally unhinged, and i reiterate, very dangerous to others and indeed the company itself.

[wigwammer] 24/7/2018 09:49

Hmm. I found it rather profitable to ignore you at 10p, given that the shares consequently rose toward 20p and still sit at a 20% premium. Given your "balanced" view consists of little more than repeating the words "funding" and "early stage" (words that could be applied to ANY early stage biotech) I think you somewhat exaggerate the value of your input. If people want a comprehensive run down of the risks - read the prospectus. More detail - less repetition :)

[gazza] 24/7/2018 08:19

That's ok TF. Personally, I would prefer no admin intervention (apart from illegal/criminal/libellous posts) and I have never filtered anyone. I can decide pretty quickly if something's worth reading or not. I agree though, some of the attacks are a bit repetitive and tedious.

[torquayfan] 24/7/2018 04:24

C7. Any suggestion that I target your posts is misleading. I focus on content and I'm afraid your 'content' often attracts attention for good reasons. Take your 16672 following Lozan 16663:-

''Lozan, correct on both counts. Hope that does indeed signal the end of the SCLP BB on LSE in its current dreadful state. And yes 11p is coming, unless the Board start communicating!!!''

1. You have endorsed two scurrilous passages from Lozan demeaning both your Friend and LSE itself. You were not, (as you said), replying to a question at all.
2. You come to this BB which is mainly a bearpit, to bewail the 'dreadful' LSE BB at a bad moment.
3. You make a prediction of a lower share price (later you emphatically deny this) and say the BoD must ''start'' !!! (to communicate). Was it 15 RNS so far this year plus many other presentations and tweets ? Start ?

The flaws in this post are obvious. Now I know that even polite criticism of your posts is 'organised out' by your wailing, exaggeration and team demonics. Please, moderate yourself if you can and deal with points raised.

(Your posting history prior March 2018 to about 2014 is indeed missing as I said - which you denied). Perhaps you've overloaded the system LOL

I cannot promise to NOT comment on your posts. I still know that white is white and black is black and will not be convinced otherwise. Sorry.

[drdobson1] 23/7/2018 08:41

Morning Lozan
Very perceptive that opening share price is a Little Flat-makes for a Very Exoensive lesson for trHYPERS and opportunity for Astuties so Little Flat is Not to Everyone’s Taste however they may dress it UP.
Science Anoraks are quiet do you think they are likely to Encourgaec Sleeper
Oysters to Pipe UP when we know they are DIscipells of Der Leader.

[the real lozan] 23/7/2018 08:27

Into week 30 -
S P lower than Jan 1st
"enable me to purchase shares at a discount off disgruntled finger pointers."
Quite so, BUT, were those shares solely made available "at a discount off disgruntled finger pointers"... Or, maybe, WISER,more ASTUTE players ???
There have been 4 'peaks' and 'troughs' {March, April,May and June} recently, where PROFITS have been there for the taking.
'Peaks' = Where B B BUYING has 'pushed-up' the S P....FOR SELLERS to GAIN
'Troughs' = Where WISER,more ASTUTE 'SELLERS' would be 'stocking-up at a discount' off disgruntled 'trHYPE swallowers', Ready for the NEXT round of PROFIT Taking.
However, since June, the 'field' has gone a "Little FLAT in Landan"
As have the 'science anoraks'...Perhaps *WE ALL* need some more "£8+ a share" type 'encouragement'..to 'help' create another opportunity to 'Make'n'Take' PROFITS ???
The 'field' being a "Little FLAT in Landan"... helps NO ONE, and is not to everyone's taste.

[wigwammer] 22/7/2018 22:42

CONvincing stuff. Really really CONvincing. Self respect is clearly no obstacle ;)