Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[the real lozan] 11/7/2018 14:04

16620...LOSSBOSS 'invents' -
"and classing Lozan as a principle poster"
.
"for the record ?" { to use the 'inane' 3rd party BS}
LOZAN does NOT -"class Lozan as a principle poster"... or TRY to "class Lozan as a principle poster"... or Explect others to "class Lozan as a principle poster"
LOZAN sees CLEARLY the FLAWS in the trHYPE
LOZAN has the intelligence to apply 'common sense'
LOZAN sees the 'VALUE' in 'BALANCED, Altenative Views'
as such
LOZAN ISN'T the one sat on HUGE LOSSES....barren LOSSchild ...IS

[morgank] 11/7/2018 13:49

Currently 11.90 to sell and 12.27 for 50k

[morgank] 11/7/2018 13:46

Don't think it was a sell, cant be sure

[drdobson1] 11/7/2018 13:44

With BIG loss
troupe gang getting astute
Sell up PLUM before it hits single figures

[drdobson1] 11/7/2018 13:38

Whopper sell
GooFy123 getting out perhaps

[gazza] 11/7/2018 12:41

Lozan,

For the record, I have to say your last post had plenty of content, merit and facts.

The above view supercedes, replaces and makes defunct any previous views I may have had and posted several years ago.

[j777j] 11/7/2018 12:39

Always nice to see that kind of volume.Heralds a rise.

[the real lozan] 11/7/2018 12:29

GUFFAW ...The 'science anorak' leader of trHYPE,,,,utters =
"however i do support his comments,"
YOU also 'SPPORTED' =
" £1 a share 'On the CARDS' years ago"
" £6 a share here almost 18 months ago"
" £8+ a share here"... maybe, perhaps, before or after man collonises Mars
" NO RISK here"
"FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here"
"BUY,BUY,BUY and HOLD"
"55,500 CLUB shares at 44.6p "
At 13.25p = "We have 'hit the bottom here"
.
DO *WE ALL* { US SHREWDIES} NEED to go on ???
OR
Should *WE ALL* just allow YOU to CONtinue to make a FOOL of YOURSELF on YOUR own ???

[morgank] 11/7/2018 12:29

0.9% of the total shares have just been traded 3.5mil !!

[inanaco] 11/7/2018 12:10

is your post aimed at Gazza Lozan ?

after all it is his description not mine ...

Gazza's description of Lozans Posts

""""""Posts devoid of content, merit, thought, intelligence or facts.""""


however i do support his comments,

[tosh123] 11/7/2018 11:31

Ineptico,
thats not obscenity, its FACT.

[inanaco] 11/7/2018 11:24

Tosh's last resort ....

Gazza - 12 Apr 2018 - 20:27:26 - 14918 of 16596 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP
If you can't construct a reasoned argument there is always obscenities - the last resort of the intellectually challenged.

[tosh123] 11/7/2018 11:08

ineptico,
as has been proven, AGAIN, they are accurate.
So far from being devoid of content, they are informative and will be of use to anyone reading this BB, unlike your Contentless, meritless, thoughtless, factless drivel.

£8 hahaha Moron.

[inanaco] 11/7/2018 10:53

Lozan is doing so well at proving up .. Gazza's description of Lozans Posts

""""""Posts devoid of content, merit, thought, intelligence or facts.""""

[inanaco] 11/7/2018 10:19

Except we are not developing inhibitors ... thus the link is a "worthless" discussion in relation to Scancell Science and the risk is non transferable

However any inhibitors that are found to work are a possible "synergy" with scancell

so not sure exactly what you so called "experts" are discussing ...

I would also point out these results have already being discussed on the LSE BB




.

[the real lozan] 11/7/2018 09:31

Re. Goosed article -
A perfect example of GOOD posting / research / BALANCE A GOOD example of WHY investors / potential investors here NEED to have access to, and BENEFIT from ALL available info / 'Alternative Views'....NOT = Just the trHYPE.
.
It should be noted, that - whereas goosed 'presented' the 16604 for ALL to observe on this 'open forum'.... it is questionable whether a certain 'science anorak gang' would have posted this article ... had they 'found it'.
Less questionable is the notion that- Had the 'science anorak trHYPE gang' 'presented' the 16604 info, *WE ALL* would , no doubt, have been TOLD to IGNORE it.

[drdobson1] 11/7/2018 07:45

Yes Goosey,
Helps explain in UNbiased way WHY there is RISK here SOOO Unlike Failed Professor PLUM is a CONplete NANA who Insists NO RISK.
Plus these are REAL scIENTIsts not NOB the Builder waanabees

[gazza] 11/7/2018 07:31

Great article goosed, thanks for posting the link. Plenty of scientific reasons why biotech investment is fraught with risk.

[drdobson1] 10/7/2018 22:20

Evening Lozan
Was there not a famous Detective called Slipper of the Yard.
Well baNANA is a infamous DEFective called SLIPPER of the SCAM GANG.
Like the THAI CONnrction after the great news from there today.NO Doubt PLUM will make a Terrible comment like he did with GRENFELL.
HIS political party is UP the SPRout and his views are Irrelevant as they are hear

[drdobson1] 10/7/2018 14:41

Well Plum.You are intellectually challenged.Bet you never reached the hights of imbecility.
You were NOT missed on here at all so LEAVE and let US post full of informed content and facts with intelligence NIT the CINsiderable amount if trHYOE you SProut.
As goosey says Timbo you may want to ask the following.
When is IND submission going in and presume it is with Trigid 2.
We don’t want any more delays with trials on either SCIB Combo or Moditope.
Us long suffering genuine SH NOT the PLANKtin like baNABA deserve much better.
Also ASK what are Odds on winning BIg Challenge and what happens with MONEY.
PLUM thinks it is a dead cert and Money GETs trousered by SCLP.
Want to make sure before I BUY more SO want an informed opinion on likelihood of winning NOT more of £8 a share trHYPE from a Proven Liar.
Bet he got a lot more than a Slipperung in the BIG HOuse.The inmates are a bit less gentle than the Headmaster