Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[gazza] 19/12/2017 20:59

Happy new year to you Chelsea as well. A very poignant post, hope you are ok and punching extra hard?

[chelsea35] 19/12/2017 20:37

Really feel bad about the postings over the last few months, particularly now. Sounds rather hypocritical coming from me, after my posts on here about Inanaco. Was very angry myself, perhaps it was burning up inside of me for a long period of time. Well it is out now, over. Very ugly here today, it has gone beyond personal now. Made a change to even converse with Panama7 today about Scancell, still banging the same old drum, everybody is.

The reason i am invested here is Lindy Durrant. She is important to many people in Oncology not just to Scancell, but our Science is hers and the team at Scancell. Just hoping that is reflected in our share price someday, I believe it will.

The reason i post on the BBs has been well aired and even this BB has been very kind to me.

Maybe it is just worth sitting back and understanding your reasons too.

Not for me to judge.

Wishing you all a Happy holiday, and particularly a Healthy Happy New Year, that is what really matters. You have all taught me most of what i know, so you have my respect, but hatred is something i wish to avoid now. Life is too short, that applies to us all. Will join you again in another time I hope. Take Care.

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 17:46

well not sure when i was last in HMP ... I must sleep walk

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 17:44

Mr W, i really don't have a clue to be honest i would have to look back over years to calculate. Because i have moved shares around with the ISA, capital gains allowance etc. its messed up completely the P/F tracker

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 17:39

was ? you have been fired ? or have you become the Deer Hunter the full time poacher

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 17:38

What's your average, just say I'm not telling you and keep your nose out, if it offends you that much

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 17:36

does it matter ? how would that help you ? I thought you had the Forrest of growing wealth

[the real lozan] 19/12/2017 17:35

Smiler.... Money well spent

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 17:33

Just remember when I was at my "Day Job" I was paying 40% income tax to keep the likes of you and other degenerates at HMP

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 17:30

Lol, my my oh my, we got our own Forrest Gump. What's your average here Forrest?

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 17:20

Mr W, i invest in properties, shares are a side line, i appreciate you still have a day job, i don't need one, i live off a growing rental stream which is not new news. that you could not afford to buy unless your bank would extend you 7 figures, even then you would still have the bank to pay back, so you can shout to the hills how great your P/f is, it not relevant to my investment P/f so all in a share is different for me, than all in for you, which is what i have said all along.

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 16:55

Come on, let's talk numbers, what's your average here? Btw I have a balanced PF, so much so that I have bought two new cars this year, mainly thanks to GLEN. Another tip for you is PFC, I'm in at £3.90, or go for Lloyds, good divi's and once this PPI nonsense is over, it will fly. Or look at DG massive French company with astounding growth.

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 16:48

sorry i don't recall you selling your couple of grand in Scancell to sit in EMED for 5 years conclusive evidence of success

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 16:44

Back in the day of LSE? You mean when the majority of negatives I spelled out came home to roost? Hence I now hold stock at a average of 12.48p, where as you with your "science" and rampy £1 on the cards etc etc have a average of?

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 16:39

hence i cannot understand why you allow Ivy to have a free reign

its your decision Boom .. Gooosed sparked the debate by insinuating i posted for EGO

now your saying my posts are reasonably correct .. does Gooosed get the Boomorbust Frown ? Do you not see the problem YOU are creating for yourself

its not about leaping to my defence, never needed a shoulder to lean on, lets face it, the only defence folks have against me is to turn it personal at that point i have won the debate anyway, because it moved from reasoned discussion to a teddy bear fight.

its more to do with bias ie you targeting only my posting rather than all that was involved including C7 but for different reasons.

back to Ouch! i did link that to condem/condone so don't take it to personal

[bermudashorts] 19/12/2017 16:26

"I appreciate that my character assassination by others, would benefit you in that your error strewn posts would not be highlighted so often .."

Ouch!

Inan,

This isn't a competition and I'm not your enemy. I know my own limitations and have never claimed to be an expert on the science, or anything for that matter. Of course you're free to post wherever you like and actually I have already said that I agree with much of what was posted on VAL. Don't expect SCLP holders to leap to your defence though when you continue to post knowing the impact it's having on the SCLP bb.

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 16:16

here for the money pal .. its an investment discussion BB, you spent nearly all of your days slagging off scancell with me defeating you in every argument so it says it all really. The question is, if i was not around would the trolls get the upper hand ? like on the VAL bb ... ie would you still be posting on Scancell LSE ... if i had not turned your aggression into the self destruct button.

You have history and back in the day on the LSE folks targeted you for your negativity same with Tosh.

so i don't have your issues.

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 16:03

And if you would actually engage 1st gear before you posted, you would realise that 99% of posters on all BB despise you. What the hell is wrong with you man? Do you get a kick from being a bell end? You have some serious issues that need addressing by professionals.

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 15:56

But you "now" hold Scancell Mr W despite Me posting .... think before you post . i know its hard

[wanderer1210_0] 19/12/2017 15:52

The mantra is "Find a negative about SCLP" The answer is blatantly obvious, Inanaco is the answer. If Prof.Durrant is on first name terms with this clown, ( which he claims ) then I would suggest it is of the best interest for all concerned with the company, that any further correspondence with this oaf be immediately axed.

[inanaco] 19/12/2017 15:49

Ivy posted on both occasions,

your just biased, as you have still to condemn Ivy ...

you have still to acknowledge that all my post on Val where on topic ?

And really who are you to even question what i should or should not post ?

I appreciate that my character assassination by others, would benefit you in that your error strewn posts would not be highlighted so often ..

However that is not how this works ... the fact that all of us are not perfect ie condone / condemn

highlights the need for constructive discussion and reasoned correction

[bermudashorts] 19/12/2017 15:39

Inanaco,

No, it was your posts on VAL which triggered the appearance of trolls on SCLP, not for the first time I might add.