We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.10 | 9.70 | 10.50 | 10.10 | 9.975 | 10.10 | 211,828 | 08:00:21 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.83 | 93.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/12/2017 15:16 | condemn agreed would be better fact remains Ivy intervention incited VAL trolls ... who then posted on SCLP along with Ivy Gloating on SCLP BB issue for Boom how does he smack down Ivy .. his mate ouch ! without appearing Biased replying from every angle is easy when people only think in the 2 dimension. which is why John G could not answer , ie You may have efficacy but is that efficacy commercial against other products coming on stream. This is the problem ONW has, not only does he have to show its commercial, but against other science that is in the market ... oh dear back to the science problem again | inanaco | |
19/12/2017 15:15 | I don"t think this conversation would be taking place if it wasn"t inanaco, and scooby-doo and Yoda hadn"t posted on SCLP BB, now there is history. A few of the VAL LTHs also said they were very poor RNSs too. There have been many occasions where we have addressed ridiculous posts against Scancell on the VAL BB. | chelsea35 | |
19/12/2017 15:06 | BoB - You DO see where you made the error here, don't you ??? Your error is in treating HIM as an adult. | the real lozan | |
19/12/2017 14:57 | already explained suggest you get past your communication issues and read exactly what i have posted. complicity in law You stood by and watched, but actually only reacting to the innocent party, ie i was on topic with VAL, the posts are still there !! not removed. if you have any issues with the technical appraisal i have done, say so, Ivy had the opportunity to, your biased reading of the situation is easily highlighted. You failed to condone IVY | inanaco | |
19/12/2017 14:53 | Chamberlain? LMFAO. What did he say about foreign entanglements? ""How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is, that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas-masks here, because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing."" | goyathlay | |
19/12/2017 14:44 | Inan, biased - how so? | bermudashorts | |
19/12/2017 14:43 | panama7, well he has delivered a commercial deal, £s5m worth, with no further dilution, at the moment anyway. Hopefully this a prelude to very good news, after much clinical development. Every biotech start up raises funds, every share does until commercialisation. Pretty happy myself to get 40% of my holding between 10/12p. Or perhaps CRUK are just funding £5m for the sake of it?? | chelsea35 | |
19/12/2017 14:21 | Chelsea, why is it OTT, the science may well have moved on. Goodfellow is the Commercial CEO that has failed to deliver one single commercial deal in 5 years although stating on several occasions he would do so. He has raised funds at ever decreasing values therefore having to issue ever more shares. He pumped the share at 34p with his ridiculous video to allow Calculus an exit strategy to the detriment of PI's. He has left you out of pocket for 5 years and allows you to believe at every AGM and every email exchange that something is just around the corner to transform the Company and the share price only for him to fail to deliver every time. He accepted a 20k ie a 20% pay rise 18 months ago while Investors have seen their investment decrease by anything up to 80%. He has cynically manipulated PI's for 5 years, you being a prime example. | panama7 | |
19/12/2017 14:12 | Boomorbust You cannot reply because of Ivy, it was his posts that got exploited by the trolls and posted on SCLP bb ... as an attempt at Character assassination. sorry but the evidence got posted. its a pity your so biased .. | inanaco | |
19/12/2017 13:49 | ONW I have not claimed any expertise, that label comes from others. of course a high quality challenge to your aspirations of greatness, always ends with your departure .. you should bulk buy the tickets You want to be seen as the commercial expert but deliver nothing .... again why have you not mentioned Ivy ? | inanaco | |
19/12/2017 13:48 | Inanaco, Likewise, had typed a long reply to your 12886 but it's not helpful to you, me or anybody reading. | bermudashorts | |
19/12/2017 13:41 | Inanaco Sadly, I think you genuinely believe your self proclaimed expertise.... It saddens me to have to realise that your naivety appears to know no bounds! I've made my point, you yours, let's call it a day on this one! ATB | oldnotwise | |
19/12/2017 13:34 | ONW as i have already explained, attacks on Scancell are welcomed, its called find the negative which is why all the negatives that you have thrown at Scancell have been dismissed usually by me. same rules applied to Mr W ... he ended up buying some. you need to smarten up your act, if your going to post on the commercial aspects at least make an attempt at Value. I gave you all the data on the SCIb2 trials linked to PD1 linked to PD1 sales, and yet you never joined in... why is that ? are you Bluffing on your experience ? seems that way | inanaco | |
19/12/2017 13:23 | FWIW I believe Inanaco's foray to the VAL BB had nothing whatsoever to do with passing enlightening information. Anyone, but anyone, who favourably compares the VAL science to that of SCLP wants their head looking at..... BUT the recent share price Shenanigans gave an unusual Trading opportunity, so I suspect (as Bermuda implies) most of the VAL trading had absolutley nothing to do with VAL's future prospects... much less the science! IMO if Inanaco realised the situation with VAL's trading situation (ie not science driven) his posts Exhibited Gratuitous Obfuscation,and if he didn't the posts were Employing Grandiose Optimism. :-) Probably NEVER a good idea ever to go to a BB where you're not a holder and start preaching.... Unless you're looking for a specific reaction...... Whatever the case those cross border posts did no service to Scancell nor the poster! AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
19/12/2017 11:13 | panama7..........""A They haven"t come up with ""absolutely nothing"",but one heck of a lot of clinical development. Hoping we now have our pipelines ready to trial now. With an external validation and a deal with CRUK, lets see what we do come up with it, now our timelines are more alligned to what others warned us, all dem years ago!! | chelsea35 | |
19/12/2017 11:08 | Gash F Y A { and anyone else interested} - Almost clear blue skies, full sun on south terrace = 15 C in the sun 2 days to go before WINTER However, that does mean the days begin to get longer, and the sun starts to return UNLIKE- any interest in ANYTHING Nappy and the SCAMMERS have to say.... There CAN be NO DOUBT that HE has 'Psychological / Personality Disorders' | the real lozan | |
19/12/2017 10:13 | Kreature, you need to catch up he shelved the Trade sale to concentrate on deals for both platforms, it's only taken him 5 years to come up with nothing. The bloke is a complete waste of space. All we get is lies, corruption and fraud. | panama7 | |
18/12/2017 23:12 | Kretchure,We already have one village idiot on this board, auditions for a replacement haven't opened yet. | gazza |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions