Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 23:14

Inan - IMO very good advice to C7 - ''You should chill out, and stop taking every post to you as an attack, but rather as a basis for discussion. Its simple way out for you, and it creates no conflict.''

Lest we forget :-

From C7 2017 ''Morning TF, Yes I enjoyed reminding myself of so much good stuff. In fact i have enjoyed reading all of Inanacos posts again. They just make you think outside the box''.

Good to see you and Boom still discussing - that line needs to stay open. You are 2 important posters on LSE and here. Thanks for your efforts both.

ATB

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 22:31

Some new poster on VAL seems to be getting VAL and SCLP confused - thinks VAL's BOD are researchers from University of Nottingham. Mind you, have to hand it to him, some of the best ramping I've seen yet on VAL, and that's saying something.

[inanaco] 30/11/2017 22:20

lol ... no worries, i do it for fun enjoy the challenge of it, so i don't have any stress issues the benefit for me is that i can quantify the science to value, making investments then easy.

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 22:11

Inan - I have 'learned' much about the autoimmune stuff. Perhaps another time, I might try 'learning' some more but at the moment I have other stuff going on and just don't need the stress. You'll have to find someone else to reason with:)

[inanaco] 30/11/2017 21:54

Its a shame Boom, reasoning allows you to teach yourself at speed, pity you cannot get your head around it. Its great fun even with curved balls coming at you. For instance the auto-immune stuff,

[inanaco] 30/11/2017 21:49

i was just editing it

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 21:45

Inan - have clarified that post on the other bb. I have said this before, we seriously have a communication problem, I don't need the stress, nor do you and more importantly it's just boring for everyone else. So am going back to using the filter for sanity's sake (yours and mine).

[inanaco] 30/11/2017 21:29

Lol .. so Boom is nearly a scientist and I am the Professor LOL. problem is C7 its taken years to get to being able to post like that, nobody would expect somebody new to achieve that, However i then support that with external validation from other scientists work showing what Lindy is doing can be seen by other published papers, process has an over lap but it has to be identified and posted so that folks can understand it, Moditope is way more complex that immunobody because it has to break tolerance of a bulk tumor on its own forcing this state of inflammation which causing more citrullinated expression. Nobody is stopping any one from posting an opinion, your problem is nobody should have a discussion about it, including your own posts. As for Killing the BB, is a bit strong as your reply to posters are way more aggressive in behaviour than mine, you only have to read your posts on here, the language used is not the Queens English ... You should chill out, and stop taking every post to you as an attack, but rather as a basis for discussion. Its simple way out for you, and it creates no conflict.

[chelsea35] 30/11/2017 19:33

Tarquin,

Hopefully this will be the last time i have to correct you. I don"t have to repeat the constant digs in your post, yesterday, Ruck Rover, Barbelfisher and Rats felt the need to pull you up on it. After receiving 8 very quick recs you still failed to "hear" what Ruck was saying. It is obvious to all, but seemingly not for you. Each time i have topped up recently you say.....""IF you did buy"",,,,,You say you love discussions, BS....you just react with flaying red cards and the filter button........."a control issue, if ever" . It would be a welcome surprise if you ever ventured to start a discussion of your own, rather than disect every word i say and make it into an issue.

The comment re bluerose posted at 3 in the morning in the context of how the BB dismissed any negative comments was added with even Smilers comments about timelines were dismissed completely. I actually tongue in cheek said we should remember how 30 posters would descend on bluerose willing to cut his throat for suggesting we were over valued at this stage and there were many other biotech shares more attractive as an investment. Nobody will have forgotten how he provoked such a mass response, but the point is it is not whether it was 10 or 50, it was a reminder of how the BB responded to anything other than buy buy buy. Whilst i have been buying....and no i didn"t say i bought 50k yesterday!!!......wrong again, i have posted on issues that have seen our share price decimated and asked others for their opinions. I never get any, still people stray from saying anything honest as to their own opinions, largely. Now we have inanaco posting as a Professor and anybody that cannot debate the science with him is not worthy of having an opinion. Can you not see the parody in that alone?? Can you really not see how few "newbies" venture forward to the BB?? And do you think the BB offers any sentiment to others as to what the BOD are trying to achieve?? And have you not noticed just how many have fled from the share or the BB to Twitter just to discuss the share without inane outbursts from you and the Professor??

History just repeats itself, nothing is learnt. You agreeing with everything Inanaco posts is blind, you don"t even understand what he posts, nobody does.There are numerous other issues that drive the share price which are deemed as garbage. Very few people even claim a buy it means nothing as they are traded anyway..all of a sudden a few have returned to ramp the share. Let us all hope we are near to inflection based news and successful funding that will take us from the considerable clinical development that was essential before we venture back into trials, that is why i have decided to take my holdings past the 100k threshold and in doing so have slashed my average to a level where i am confident with the right news we can reasonably achieve. There have been some extraordinary rises across the AIM market this year. Although i am a "one trick pony" i do trade, i enjoy it.

Hopefully this request to reply to you is the last i have to do. Rather than looking for points to argue, you might just consider some of my points, as IMVHO you and Inanaco are killing that BB, we deserve better, at least Scancell as a share richly deserves.

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 15:59

DC Vaccines -

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 14:45

C7. If you want to play this game - you posted words to the effect that I was worse than a low life liar. I'm not on revenge - just trying to deal with the stuff as it goes on - day by day. I love discussions and finding out ? Irrespective. Calm down.
And TCOY.

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 14:40

C7. It was just a question. Try answering or explaining where you are coming from sometimes ? Your 'slitting 30 throats' exaggeration was odd - what was the purpose of that angle ? Please answer.

Actually I question any poster at all when I don't understand or if I disagree - even Inanaco who might remember. It comes from thinking I hope.

I have to tell you of a comment from your new Pal - Lozan. A few months ago, he posted that, you and I were simulating ( or similar) a disagreement for the purpose of the 'Club'. I don't think so. Relax and have a good sleep.

TCOY it's my bedtime. ATB

P.S. Who is Tarquin ? Who is Elsie ? Stop it.

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 14:27

Thanks Bermuda,

Not 'simply disagreeing' but thanks for reading and being interested.

MHO but the 'external' bit comes from outside - externally.
I.E. not 'provided' by SCLP but 'validated' by someone else . .
So maybe it does come down to semantics - t'was just a question.

Musing - NSCLC must be a nuclear attraction ? Which product from SCLP's vast potential will attract the 1st 'deal' - who knows ? I admit to thinking that a wider 'deal' or the Patent publication on Modi might be the first 'attraction'.
Externally that is.

(I nearly got lost in the 'jungle' today with my M8 - just happy to be here right now - that is NOT an analogy to any other problems !)

GLA and nice to see a bit of blue.

[chelsea35] 30/11/2017 14:24

Tarquin. You posted to me...............

"""Further, you posed the following wisdom - And ''I just wonder whether SCB2 could provide "external validations"" for the Immunabody platform as well''.

I asked - ''As SCIB 2 is part OF the Immunobody platform - how would that work ? Externally ?''. Fair question."""

Wisdom eh??? Unfortunately you are not even up to reasoned conclusions, even when confirming it is part of Immunabody. Not the reply you would have posted to any other poster, just demeaning, halting discussion, and personal. Actually just plain stupid!!

[inanaco] 30/11/2017 13:47

gooosed .. not me giving out false data on events and prepared to release more, check with c7leaks.com
As i don't know who you are, and your name is not mentioned why get involved ?
So as for tread carefully i am now intrigued .. are you now making threats ?
against my posts that actually try to protect all those that have been in private chats ?

filtered ? the secret little games you guys play . LOL

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 12:34

A quick reminder of a current partners presentation tomorrow ;



(found by boom)

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 12:22

ah OK thanks for that. So you accept that a deal on any one of the products provides external validation, you simply disagree on the most likely product to cut the first deal.

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 11:31

OK thanks for the chance to explain.

My recollection of the AGM recording and later comments on the LSE BB, was to the effect that JC was talking about a drive to raise the Scancell 'profile' again in the USA when we had some impliedly, shortly to be achieved, 'external validation' to offer in discussion.

SCIB2 - Commencement of the trial is some time away. It is part of the Immunobody platform belonging to Scancell and not 'external' atm of course.

IMHO and the impression gained from LSE comments, it seemed that the source of 'external' validation was hopefully to be the 1st 'deal', or a later 'deal', or possibly, SCLP's credibility having been raised by a handsome indication of award of Patents for Moditope. Both would be as referred to by JC, 'external' validations of Scancell's status IMO.

Whilst conceivably one day SCIB2 might be the subject of external interest and provide validation, I'd be surprised to see it as the next and imminent validation that JC is hoping for to add to the armoury of CH and RG in 2018. Maybe the semantics threw me a little - 'provide' is not the right word - maybe 'attract' external validation would describe it better. SCIB2 might one day be the source of a deal but I see many other more likely and imminent weapons in the Scancell armoury.

Thanks again for replying to my question. ATB

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 11:28

goosed - thanks for that, will have a listen

rHatton, yes.

[gooosed] 30/11/2017 10:52

May be of interest to some.

[bermudashorts] 30/11/2017 10:44

TF

What is your issue with the statement "I just wonder whether SCB2 could provide external validations" ?

Genuine question, why couldn't/shouldn't SCIB2 be the product that brings the 'external validation' talked about by RG and JC?

[torquayfan] 30/11/2017 10:31

C7 I just noticed your earlier allegation of 'revenge', (daily). Nonsense.
Absolutely none of this is personal at all.

Yesterday I politely pointed out your florid exaggeration on LSE 03.53, ''thirty howling posters ready to slit his throat'' about the reception to Bluerose's posts years ago - I never remember even ONE poster writing or implying such.

Further, you posed the following wisdom - And ''I just wonder whether SCB2 could provide "external validations"" for the Immunabody platform as well''.

I asked - ''As SCIB 2 is part OF the Immunobody platform - how would that work ? Externally ?''. Fair question.

Surely that is 'rational' discussion and part of what a Forum is about. That is not being 'torn apart'. Oh, unless you are unable to take any criticism at all ?
In which case, 'Man up' !


I enjoyed re-reading your 'Testimonial' Feb 2017 to Inanaco as reposted 12685 :-

''Morning TF, Yes I enjoyed reminding myself of so much good stuff. In fact i have enjoyed reading all of Inanacos posts again. They just make you think outside the box''.

I'd echo that. Now relax and TCOY.

[tosh123] 30/11/2017 08:52

Nappy continues to be outed ... thanks C7 for further proof of what a despicable individual he is... YUCK !
Horrible little man.