Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[nigelpm] 25/9/2023 07:26

Agree with Torquay. Time to stop the baiting and nonsense. Leave people with their views even if there's plenty of evidence against them.

[inanaco] 25/9/2023 07:19

seems to me those that lose the argument descend into verbal bully boys ....

tangible intangible

mt .... risky

then ramps the fk out of it .....

look in the mirror ....

hypocrisy gone mad

Moljen 20p never existed figment of imagination

TF i suggest you read all the thread

[torquayfan] 25/9/2023 01:10

Ruck, apart from Loz, you seem to be the main actor in this endless baiting back of Inan. We've had the same discussions hundreds of times in different forms and it brings no help to observers of Scancell. Sad to see others joining the fray now with Ivy again, thankfully though Tosh, was not around this time.

Wouldn't it be better to take the best of what Inan brings to the BB and try to ignore the rest ? Otherwise we'll have to put up with this until the £8 (?) arrives and we all go away somewhere else. Maybe give it a break ?

[dominiccummings] 24/9/2023 21:32

Dead right marking time..... fair does though, he does know the science well.

[markingtime] 24/9/2023 21:01

One of the most concerning things about holding Scancell shares in quantity is that the only person on these boards who has claimed he holds more than I do (though I am sure others also do) is a delusional car park attendant who suffers from verbal diarrhoea, a persecution complex and narcissism. He also has no understanding of risk or finance, despite repeatedly professing the opposite dozens of times a day, and an obsession about trying (though failing) to belittle everyone he interacts with (whereas I only do that with about a third of them ;-)) and continually big himself up to compensate for his clear inadequacies.If the company's value depended on its shareholder register, I'd be worried...

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 20:02

time will reveal all ...😂

[ivyspivey] 24/9/2023 19:55

Yep Ruck,
Investing all your share dosh in one AIM Biopharma years from producing any revenue and by its own admission likely need further dilution as it has done for years is pretty risky.
That is why he constantly dismiss’s anyone who questions his judgement either on the Science or his wisdom of going all in here.
He simply can’t afford to be wrong and his EGO won’t allow him to admit it.
Well we have seen the effect of one post by a postie on the share price here it had the same effect as his 70k of posts and he can’t stand being outdone which he constantly is.
Anyway more rugby to watch.

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 18:46

trouble is its not £140k anymore ....

atb

something called capital growth .....

😉

[the real lozan] 24/9/2023 18:42

" £140k as an investment fund is pretty small beer." -
Quite so
BUT
It's not bad for someone with the capability of a 12 year old
With the petulant nature of a 12 year old

[ruckrover] 24/9/2023 18:19

Inan, Ivy's right, £140k as an investment fund is pretty small beer. Most of us here likely have investments far in excess of that spread over several equities with 15-40k in each. Just because you have decided to invest a fairly modest pot in a single penny share doesn't make you some sort of investment guru, quite the opposite.

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 17:08

"""Why can’t you get it into your head that if me and many others wanted to have 1.4m shares in SCLP we would have acquired them.It is no big deal but you don’t seem to be able to come to terms with that fact.""""


with a subprime loan ...... 👏👏👏

really Ivy i don't care what you have .. you think you have ... might have

what i do know because you just told us ... you have a small holding that fell in value ... you bought some more and sold them before RNS

and you think its risky .....

You constantly tell folks how to trade, how to buy and sell as if we are all stupid

you tell folks HVO made a profit when it made a loss ... and would not accept it


stick with HVO .... yet to declare a profit .... value £130m and at best might make £6m Gross next year

i told you it was expensive at 30p .......... its now 20p

so what you do is up to you ...... but stop inflating yourself up as somebody important 🤳 Colin from accounts

then nobody can burst the bubble

[ivyspivey] 24/9/2023 16:58

I did not say I was bigger or richer than you but you are the one that seems to get off on repeated posts of saying how many shares you hold as if it sone kind of badge on honour.
Why can’t you get it into your head that if me and many others wanted to have 1.4m shares in SCLP we would have acquired them.It is no big deal but you don’t seem to be able to come to terms with that fact.
Your good mate C7 admitted that after 12 years of being involved here he sold out and basically just got his money back so you are likely to be in a similar boat so you probably would have been better off putting the money in a building society.
Mind you they don’t have BBs that you can spout your carp on but just think how your EGO coukd be stroked by you taking your big bag of coins down to the local Ilfarcombe Building Soc branch and loudly declaring these are my profits from my Car Park business and I am adding to my very big amount in my Regular saver Account.

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 16:47

what ever i cant be bothered with you ........... Ruck

you don't even understand the basics


😒

[ruckrover] 24/9/2023 16:45

"Ruck the ip's current value is not on the balance sheet"No, but the only relevant bit to the conversation is the net asset value which is - 15.4M. (1.8p per share)What we think, hope, wish the ip value is is of no relevance in the scenario under discussion.

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 16:25

watch the rugby .......

Ruck needs to consider what a tangible asset is ... and non tangible (intangible)

ATB

Ruck the ip's current value is not on the balance sheet

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 16:12

so what you are saying this is wrong then ..... ? your own post


RuckRover - 24 Sep 2023 - 13:50:08 - 6233 of 6250 Scancell - Pot of Gold or POS? - SCLP
Yes, these are included in 15.4M non tangible assets (1.8p per share)

[ruckrover] 24/9/2023 15:29

Page 32 of the accounts total assets 15.4 million (1.8p per share)

[ruckrover] 24/9/2023 15:28

Just to remind you, my original question was do you think Scancell are trading below their NAV? ) therefore no risk at 16p. With an share price of 16p and a NAV of 1.8p the answer seems to be no.Do you have ANY evidence to refute that?

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 15:28

or a link and a page number

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 15:27

2022 full accounts

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 15:27

inanaco24 Sep '23 - 14:11 - 6237 of 6244 Edit
0 0 0
what page have you discovered .... intangible assets Ruck ???

[ruckrover] 24/9/2023 15:24

Sorry, what are you still waiting for?

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 15:14

inanaco24 Sep '23 - 14:27 - 6238 of 6242 Edit
0 0 0
still waiting .........

🤷‍a94;️

RuckRover24 Sep '23 - 13:50 - 6233 of 6237
0 0 0
Yes, these are included in 15.4M non tangible assets (1.8p per share)

[inanaco] 24/9/2023 15:01

"" if my sole focus had been to acquire shares in SCLP then I would hold a hell,of a lot more than you currently have at a much lower average so I would be the happy one.""

I am bigger and richer than you Nana 🕵️205;♂️

i would take out another subprime loan to buy them 😂

not sure he can buy at my average ... but still let him dream 🤷‍a94;️


🧨

Colin know's finance