Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[nigelpm] 14/7/2023 22:21

Very true Ruck - I noted that £8 was pie in the sky many times also. Still, with a fair wind many multiples of 10p (£90m) are still possible but you're right it's risky.

[panama7] 14/7/2023 20:52

Wigwam, don't think you're in any position to call anyone out, none of your conspiracy theories have come true have they. In fact you have pretty much posted mis and disinformation for 2 years, surprised you haven't been censored.

[panama7] 14/7/2023 20:48

Dominic, why don't you do something useful and give the Covid enquiry your old bosses password.

[dominiccummings] 14/7/2023 20:44

C'mon 2tyke. Are you waiting for a wave or something? Off with you.

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 20:40

Just off dominic.
Now you're here convo has plunged to new depths.
Nurse your losses !
Wiggy sold some of his...in hindsight of course...lol

[dominiccummings] 14/7/2023 20:34

2tyke. Still here? Nurse will wonder why you are not tucked up in bed. C'mon now.

[wigwammer] 14/7/2023 20:28

It wouldn't matter whether they were fundamental, quant, hedge fund, absolute value, momentum, value, growth - they would all laugh at the deluded 2tyke... the understanding of knowledge and crowds has nothing to do with ellioticians - they are basket case behavioural finance wannabe's who haven't managed to prove any of it works.. Which is exactly why the big money doesn't use it! ... ATB

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 20:23

Well we've got 15 years of evidence that fundamentals and science work haven't we wiggy ?
Just look how that price has dropped.
You are so easy to toy with.
Now hang your head !

[wigwammer] 14/7/2023 20:03

"Understanding the nature and actions of 'crowds' is my business dude. It's what I do"... says 2tyke... no pal, its what you think you do.... But if you go for an interview in the city armed with EW as the asset, you will quickly learn it is just some little course you went on, before reviewing the serious stuff... ATB

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 20:02

It's like Ivy says really.
The likes of inane and the clappers on LSE are guilty of dissing anyone with a less than euphoric expectation of the prospects for the stock.
That does NOT result in balanced debate. In fact they stupidly stick to views that have been shown to be false.
Like the stock is cheap as chips at 20p and 15p.
The market doesn't understand.
It was NOT cheap it was very very expensive.
It was them that didn't understand.
The should all grow a pair and hang their heads for their foolishness.

[wigwammer] 14/7/2023 19:56

Didn't ivyspivey buy at 22p and then broadcast the decision here?Heaven help if anyone was led astray by that blooper...He would never ever ever be convinced by anything without a full data set (but is now a paid up believer in EW, despite not seeing any evidence supporting it)

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 19:08

Cornetto...
Yes ...and probably because of inane and the happy clappers I'm a few quid down ! Lol
No seriously.
Obviously I can anticipate their behaviour because I'm an elliottician. But like Ivy...I'm thinking of others who these charlatans have helped lead astray.
EW accepts risk..period
It understands the uncertainty of the markets in talking about probabilities.
Thus...my position is that the current price level may be close to a bottom and sentiment should turn positive.
It is NOT that there is NO RISK like silly inane.
The stock market is ALWAYS gambling. No 2 ways about it.

[amaretto1] 14/7/2023 18:57

Thought you had gone long here ?

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 18:42

Correct ivy,

Take a bow inane...and ALL the happy clappers over on LSE.
Bow your collective heads....in shame.

[ivyspivey] 14/7/2023 18:36

You are wrong Nana I do think of people not for oeople.There is big difference.
Why don’t just admit you were wrong to claim that the mouse data would be extrapolated in humans and also that the Modi 1 results were guaranteed to work based on the fantastic response to one of the very earliest trial lists.
Despite being told by several folk on here including me,Bermuda and others that you cannot take for granted that mouse data would be replicated in humans and that it is very unsound to try and extrapolate any wider conclusions based on one or two trial patients.
Even LD supported our position but you insisted that we were wrong and you were correct,
I am not interested in who has called the events correctly as they can turn out differently to how we may think they will.
But I do think you owe many people an apology for the mental suffering they may have suffered in “ believing” you’re all in no risk approach.
The one good thing that has happened in recent days despite the obvious suffering and pain of many SH is that any tiny morsel of credibility you may have had has been blown out of the water once again.
ATB

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 18:26

He's not used to shops Panama.
Just car parks...empty space.
Same between his ears...

[panama7] 14/7/2023 18:21

Inane, what happens to a shop that have products on the shelf that have a value that no one is willing to pay, now transfer that analogy to Scancell. They can have all the patents in the world but like a lot of the patents on Dragon's Den they are worthless.

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 18:14

Understanding the nature and actions of 'crowds' is my business dude. It's what I do.
I'm an elliottician.

[inanaco] 14/7/2023 18:08

you seem to think for a lot of people ...

Ivy does that

[2tyke] 14/7/2023 18:06

Inane,
Don't get angry....address the problem dude.
Stock investment is RISKY.
If you don't accept that STFU and stop posting.
Because most on these BB's are deluded. They really think your science posts mean the share price should go up.
Shame on you...