
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savannah Energy Plc | LSE:SAVE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BP41S218 | ORD GBP0.001 |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.00 | 9.50 | 9.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells | USD 227.04M | USD 31M | USD 0.0192 | 4.01 | 104.69M |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
15:02:31 | O | 4,184 | 9.475 | GBX |
Date | Time | Source | Headline |
---|---|---|---|
06/6/2025 | 14:28 | ALNC | ![]() |
06/6/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc FY 2024 Annual Results and Notice of AGM |
27/5/2025 | 17:20 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc Holding(s) in Company |
19/5/2025 | 21:34 | ALNC | ![]() |
19/5/2025 | 16:47 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc Director/PDMR Shareholding |
19/5/2025 | 10:34 | ALNC | ![]() |
19/5/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc Q1 2025 Trading Update |
17/4/2025 | 16:30 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc Holding(s) in Company |
04/4/2025 | 18:23 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc Director/PDMR Shareholding |
04/4/2025 | 17:01 | UK RNS | Savannah Energy Plc CEO Coffee Morning for Savannah's Retail Investors |
Savannah Energy (SAVE) Share Charts1 Year Savannah Energy Chart |
|
1 Month Savannah Energy Chart |
Intraday Savannah Energy Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
19/6/2025 | 15:11 | Savannah Energy - High Growth Sustainable Energy Specialist | 4,501 |
17/4/2025 | 08:53 | Savannah Energy | 245 |
23/1/2023 | 08:36 | New name, new hope? | 7,492 |
14/10/2022 | 05:23 | SAVE with charts | 11 |
28/3/2022 | 16:12 | Looks like zengas was wrong | - |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
14:02:32 | 9.48 | 4,184 | 396.43 | O |
13:57:31 | 9.43 | 50,000 | 4,712.50 | O |
13:56:37 | 9.10 | 12,036 | 1,095.28 | O |
13:55:32 | 9.00 | 4,680 | 421.20 | AT |
13:55:31 | 9.50 | 263 | 24.99 | O |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 19/6/2025 09:20 by Savannah Energy Daily Update Savannah Energy Plc is listed in the Drilling Oil And Gas Wells sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SAVE. The last closing price for Savannah Energy was 6.50p.Savannah Energy currently has 1,610,615,112 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Savannah Energy is £124,017,364. Savannah Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 4.01. This morning SAVE shares opened at 7p |
Posted at 18/6/2025 16:20 by jungmana This will rise back soon imo especially if we get some good news from 1 or 2 of the many fronts.I hold SEA at an average in the high teens and imo SAVE also offers great opportunity under 10p share price.Just have to work through the sellers ( distressed imo) who were stuck for 2 years when we were in suspension |
Posted at 06/6/2025 00:34 by zengas I wonder if Lekoil is struggling ?We still have a SAVE Nigerian director on the Fenikso board so should know whats going on. Receipt of funds which are all 8.65% of their gross crude payments. 5th Jul 2024 $1.332m 15th Aug $838.5k. 24th Sept $690.9k. 28th Oct $403.9k. 12th Dec $543.2k. 31st Jan 2025 $417.9k. 19th Mar $676.4k 4th June $553.67k Over the last 12 months they'e paid $5m to Fenikso - meaning Lekoils gross for a year was under $60m revenue so even using a low of $60/barrel, production must be under 2800 bopd ? It's taken from 31 Dec 2022 to reduce the loan by $15.2m from $51.9m to $36.7m after a period of high oil prices or $6m/year average. In the last year it has reduced by only $4m so at the current lower oil price it will take another 9 years if production/investmen That seems to be Lekoils only income so how do they even begin to progress that big 700 mmbo discovery (even if they still have an interest). I posted on Optimum/Save a number of times here about that huge discovery ? Would Save be back at the negotiating table with Lekoil ( and/or Optimum) and sort out that hefty crippling loan and by doing so allow Fenikso to move on in some way also ? Fenikso will have only $1.5m including their energy investments valuation end of December 2025 and are looking for energy investments but they were also using some of their money buying up their own shares/reducing the number in issue which i didn't understand if they wish to grow. In the original deal, Lekoil would have gotten $50m deferred consideration (Fenikso pro-rata 8.65% ??) As part of the deal Lekoil was prevented from buying shares in Fenikso while their loan was outstanding. Save originally had the option to take on the assignment of the $135m loan between the company and Mayfair assets and Trust ltd. The original deal - "The Company entered into the Option Agreement with Savannah Energy granting it an option to be assigned the inter company debt owed to the Company by Mayfair, its associated security related to OPL 310 and all rights and benefits of the Company with respect to the Mayfair Loan. A US$1 million payment is payable by Savannah Energy to the Company upon such exercise and assignment (which has not currently been exercised). Pursuant to the Option Agreement, the Company would be paid deferred consideration in the event that Savannah Energy obtains a working interest in OPL 310 (for example, upon enforcement of security for repayment of the Mayfair Loan) and OPL 310 is developed. Such deferred consideration (capped at US$50 million) is structured as a royalty of 0.5% on crude oil sales attributable to Mayfair's actual participating interest in OPL 310 (being a 17.14% participating interest). " |
Posted at 05/6/2025 20:17 by zengas In all fairness Seplat were blessed with initial oil production of 24k bopd and had net debt of $304m and IPO'd at 210p and a m/cap of £1.1 billion on 9th April 2014RNS Number : 4066E SEPLAT 09 April 2014 The Offer Price has been set at 210 pence per Ordinary Share for shares to be traded on the LSE's main market Chairman of SEPLAT, said: "We have a production target of 85,000 barrels of oil and condensate per day by the end of 2016 from our current assets, " How it went 2014 24.2k bopd + 39.4 mmcf/d = 30.8k boepd. Net debt $304m. 2015 29k bopd + 86 mmcf/d = 43.3k boepd. Net debt $573m. 2016 10k bopd + 95 mmcf/d = 25.87k boepd. Net debt $516m 2017 17.8k bopd + 114 mmcf/d = 36.9k boepd. Net debt $141m. 2018 25.6k bopd + 145 mmcf/d = 47.87k boepd. Net cash positive $135m 2019 23.9k bopd + 131 mmcf/d = 46.5k boepd. Net debt $456m. 2020 33k bopd + 101 mmcf/d = 51k boepd. Net debt $439m. 2021 29k bopd + 108 mmcf/d = 47.6k boepd. Net debt $426m. 2022 24.7k bopd + 112mmcf/d = 44.1k boepd. Net debt $365m. 2023 28k bopd + 114mmcf/d = 47k boepd. Net debt $305m. At the end of October 2024 prior to the Exxon acquistion completing they had 29.6k bopd + 103mmcf/d = 47.5k boepd. Net debt $270m. $690m paid in dividends from ipo to end October 2024 or about £500m given the exchange averages over those 11 years of yearly, half yearly and quarterly payments of 85-90p/share in total. Despite the goal at IPO of 85,000 boepd for 2016 they never got near it. They didn't clear their net debt ever bar for one year in those 11 years. Share price high 2 months after IPO at 266p. It consistently was down 50 -75 and 80% and has taken a full 11 years to get back over its ipo price. Yes the dividends of 85-90p help from ipo (paying it actually kept the company in significant net debt all those years bar 1) but is that anymore of a return since ipo than money invested in the bank unless you got a better entry point, sat through all the court cases, a $26m cost of an aborted acquisition, oil theft, pipelines out of action, targets not met on production, infighting, immigration case trying to expel the CEO 2023 etc. Share price Dec 2014 102p. Jan 2016 55p. Jan 2017 67p. Dec 2017 107p. Aug 2018 154p. Sep 2019 101p. March 2020 40.75p. Nov 2021 71p. Dec 2022 85p. Jan 2024 121p. April 2025 161p. Now 220p post 2.75 year deal completion of Exxon assets. As regards anyone saying this is how Save should have done it. I doubt those saying it would have been any happier along the way since their ipo. The lack of BB interest and discussion speaks volumes ie a combined 742 posts over 3 threads in 11 years showed not many brave enough or stuck with it - but it's seen now as a somewhat better example than Save by our chief complainant ? |
Posted at 05/6/2025 10:30 by rockyride The time to look forward will be if and when the share price surpasses the IPO price. Remember AK saying when I asked him about the 47p and 68p hurdle prices a few years ago:- "the share price will be multiples of those numbers"! Come on Andy my little pooch, time to deliver and forget giving us any more broken promises! |
Posted at 04/6/2025 11:46 by washingmachine Rocky exactly!Share price saying the complete opposite Still a large seller dumping even at this supposedly low share price It will be in the 5 s next |
Posted at 24/5/2025 13:39 by zengas A new update valuation report by McDaniels on all the assets (which the company estimates is worth $1.52 billion) is due in the next few weeks - so if there was a so called MBO why get that out to show investors the real value yet snap it up on the cheap ?. That's a 40p valuation after the deduction of debt.While at the same time as having a $1.4b approx including interest claim for the seized assets and which has been acknowledged that we are due some level of compensation - worth 60p or 4.3p per every $100m. Plus at some point a reduction in $500m receivables due - worth 22p or 4.3p per every $100m. A possible step change of up to 50% gas output next year on top of an already significantly rising Sipec increase (Sipec will contribute around $100m of dollar revenue). Likewise SAVE have just tapped existing and new shareholders by issuing 298m shares for almost $30m as seen in the holdings. The new strategic investor by Sept 4th up to 12-13 weeks away is to get 113.378m shares and take the shares in issue to c 1749.5m. Ingalls will fall to 10.25%, Blacksea down to 9.51% as the others will unless they buy in the current market. Even the new strategic investor for $10-$11m will hold just 6.5%. There's little difference in the holdings pattern amongst the cross section of major investors that i can see versus similar holdings and percentages prior to March that one could have said similar off re a buyout. The CEOs holding will increase to about 9.8% but the rest of the entire management hardly registers and will actually fall back to 1.3% come September. The CEO has 101m warrants that he has to pay 19.2p to exercise before any profit - is he going to lose all that ? The Chairmans recent buy at 9.8p brings his average since he came in barely 2 years ago to 24.115p. There were 9 key focus areas over the next 12 months from the update on the 3rd March, so whats in store next 9 months max if he wants to deliver on the acquisition front ? No 3 was deliver the Sipec acquisition (completed). No 9 was/is the delivery of further 'transformational' acquisitions (Plural). These must be on a different scale and separate to Sipec as Sipec was never described as transformational. You also wouldn't want to deliver these before or in the middle of a so called MBO. Actually bringing in the new investors was to 'Enable the potential acceleration of key business development opportunities under consideration' in reference to organic and inorganic growth. I think the reason the CEO has been buying is because we are understandably cheap, get the share price moving back up/accelerate the removal of shares in the market for sale and instill some investor confidence. |
Posted at 12/5/2025 09:45 by zengas Not sure about the red flag.Save received around $1.7m in the last year from Fenikso. In the last 3 months mid Dec 2024 - mid March 2025 they got $316k. Lekoil pay 8.65% from their oil liftings to Fenikso which in turn pay a percentage of their gross to SAVE. Oil Price goes up or down it affects the payment level. If Lekoil gets into any difficulty then it affects the ability to pay Fenikso and ultimately SAVE. We have a non exec in Fenikso. So perhaps $5.7m now to SAVE can be put to much better use rather than smaller long term payments and the risk of non payment. It's a 50% haircut on the outstanding balance but at the current rate it would take 8-10 years to get it all. Fenikso has no other assets other than about $1.7m cash and some minor green energy interest projects in S.E Asia and dependent on continued payment from Lekoil. They want a clean break too from their obligation to us. With the oil price haven fallen it could put pressure on the ability to repay and it would ultimately reduce the level of payments. Seperately, On the original deal by late 2022 via Fenikso we were to have an option interest in OPL 310/Mayfair loan. This was an estimated 780 mmboe recoverable discovery with potential far greater upside. Lekoil came away retaining that but there was still a later court case in 2023 concerning Lekoil/Optimum petroleum. Have Lekoil still got it ? OPL310 is one for development and i'm sure this government wants movement. Save must have been after it given the option was in the original deal for them. Likewise Optimum previously had involvement in the Agadem blocks where we now are. That might all be irrelevant. Personally i think it prudent to take that $5.76m now and before year end. Within 3.5 months we should learn who the strategic investor is, coming in by 4th September with an additional $12.5m to come in. (Total $18m). We are also producing double the oil element since deal closure with it set to rise further to circa 4700 bopd. |
Posted at 17/3/2025 15:25 by rockyride Email sent to the NOMAD team at Strand Hanson:-To the Savannah energy NOMAD team:-Can you please explain why Andrew Knott ignored multiple questions from PI's re the 7p placing at his recent WEBCAST post suspension being lifted?Judging by the bulletin boards his presentation raised more questions than answers and he simply presented SAVE to be in very fine fettle without addressing PI's main significant concerns. I've recently written to SAVE IR but they are not replying to anyone's emails,I along with other have lost a lot of money here while the CEO gets paid very handsomely whilst taking the share price from IO 10 years ago of 56p to todays price of 8p. Market Cap is below our IPO price and he have increased the shares in circulation by 533%. The CEO has also ensured he has taken part in multiple placing at ridiculously low prices in order to lower his average price but not allowing PI's to do the same. He then has the audacity to recommend to PI's on his recent call to average down and but at over 10p.I've recently written to IR myself with the following questions but I'm not hopeful of a reply. Can I ask that you mandate Andrew Know to take part in a live Q&A call with PI's where all PI's questions can be put to him by pressing *1 and that everybody hears all the questions and all of his answers. Waiting another 4 months or so until AGM is too long to wait to get answers to all our questions. Here are the ones I recently sent to IR:-Not copied my questions as I posted them earlier! |
Posted at 17/3/2025 11:29 by rockyride 2014 IPO 300m shares, share price 56p & market cap £150m.2025 1.6bn shares, share price 8p & market cap £128m.For all the muppets out there who stand by and defend AK - get real!What an absolutely disgraceful performance whilst paying himself a fortune and bagging a multi-million share holding at absolutely rock bottom prices! |
Posted at 07/3/2025 10:57 by rockyride And if we are the best placed small O&G company in Africa with amazing access to capital, why do we have to bring in another large holder, giving 10% of the company at 7p per share just to get a $200m facility.Q - If we have so much choice of lenders for similar capital, why did we not just let the share price find its own price and then do a deal in a few months when share price had risen after expected good news?A - Because AK could hide behind the smoke and mirrors and rape and pillage us in tandem.And if we had not bought them in we'd have nobody demanding that AK puts more in to have more skin in the game!IMHO- if we have world bank guarantees, there was no need for this disastrous dilution! |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions