Sareum Share Discussion Threads

[wolfofwallstreets] 28/3/2024 07:20

Ramp away CriticalStinker1...

10p a share...

Painful...

[criticalthinker1] 28/3/2024 07:18

up to 2,255,000 new Ordinary Shares via a direct subscription (the "Subscription Shares") by certain high net worth individuals (the "Subscription

[peaceandlove] 27/3/2024 23:15

You're correct Wolf. I'm invested in a few penny shares on AIM and comment on LSE as and when necessary. We all want to hit the jackpot on AIM, the problem is, it's similar odds to winning the lottery lol.

The ramping of the happy clappers though without a shed of evidence is shocking! And Robin is correct when he says people have lost money because the SOGS of this world. He by far is one of the worst rampers I've ever come across. Lastly, if you read previous RNS Sar always say things like 'potential', 'we believe', 'subject to financing' etc. interesting!

[wolfofwallstreets] 27/3/2024 23:06

You know what I find most sobering of all...the market cap at £10m is now less than synairgen!

Synairgen...VAL..Genedrive...sareum.
They have all followed the same path..

Massive growth in 2020..
Peaked in 2021
Tons of hype...
Now penny shares worth a few millions
Kept alive by the occasional ramp...a hopeful rns..and more placings...

All are going to fail...

Peaceandlove...again....bang on..
I'm sure they all top sliced..yet they all said in 2021 "I'm not selling a single share until we get to £14.."

To be fair.. the market cap will be £14 soon enough..

[wolfofwallstreets] 27/3/2024 22:36

Peaceandlove...

Just read potnak over on LSE...they are "living rent free in our heads"...and yet he's over here checking out the comments...

No doubt worried they have lost control of the narrative...

No more happy clappy ramping by rampers like crotchlessthinker and darkpoo and SilverGivesHead...

They can't pretend the titanic hasn't hit the iceberg...the ship is slowly sinking...

The LSE loons are struggling with the happy clappy rubbish...

Mamy happy returns chaps...

[wolfofwallstreets] 27/3/2024 19:02

Potnak has certainly been drinking his happy clappy ramping juice today...can't belive as the share price seems now settled at 10 million that any of them have the cheek to talk anymore about billion pound valuations. Its a shame...they obviously can't admit defeat. Its like paying a deposit for a trip on the titanic a year after it sank...

[peaceandlove] 27/3/2024 17:49

Potnak today - no word of a lie his posts start like this;

If the UK government
Out of all the scenarios
All we need to worry about
If this deal was on the table
To add to my list, and I'm not an expert here
And, seriously, I'd rather lose the lot
As dire as it feels
I think Tim and John are honest guys
GF, it's why I'm done with AIM
Another speculation
As far as I can see

Hahahaha sorry Potnak - poor chap.

I'll leave it now, but as you say the desperation...... Hopefully, we get that RNS tomorrow.

Cheers 🍻

[barkbooo] 27/3/2024 16:47

peaceandlove - “LOL, you're obviously a LSE poster” you are wrong again, I never read, post or have anything to do with LSE……..ADVFN have all the information that I need …along with large investor friends that tend to know things.

So you see - you are wrong again……knowing that you say so many things that are untrue….why should anyone take you as a legitimate poster.

Answers on a postcard - these guys simply do not, and could not know how this stock will do……claiming they do, and giving financial advice needs investigating imo.

I have not reported anyone - but I do have 22 full pages of content to date ..that is rapidly filling their folder…..maybe just for a rainy day. lol

[wolfofwallstreets] 27/3/2024 16:08

Peace...just had a look at lse and was about to comment same!

Potnak and his utter drivel!

Say this is worth 4 billion.. and 90% chance of failure and so 400 million..

It's like they don't see the share price had collapsed to 10 million..

Game over fellas..

Feel like the happy clappy rampers are just desperate now.

[peaceandlove] 27/3/2024 15:55

Potnak has lost the plot LOL

[barkbooo] 27/3/2024 13:12

peaceandlove - very commendable.

Two questions…and an answer to your question:

1) why have you selected specific stocks….have you inside information on those stocks, or is it just a hunch?

2) why do you spend so much valuable time persuading investors to sell….once anyone expresses their opinion or view…we understand their opinion. Keep saying the same thing forty times a day seven days a week - is bordering on insanity.

“What is your opinion on Sar Bark”:

The share price is now reflective of the current SAR position - however I have no way of knowing what will happen in the coming months….it is certainly not a lights out position and I doubt if there is a single person on the planet that knows that answer - you are suggesting you do??

I am an ex. Bookmaker that invests with the same overround book in all markets - this stock has had a very tasty price in the past….those moves were managed and balanced by myself. I have zero emotion with any investment..just a mathematical one.

I thank you for your concern - but i truthfully feel you have a far less understanding in markets and this stock than me…..telling myself and others the same thing hour by hour, day by day is not necessary…but I have a feeling that you with others will continue this selfless act.

[wolfofwallstreets] 27/3/2024 13:03

Barkboo...dry your eyes Bono..

If you want an echo chamber of sareum hope and dreams..you aren't going to find it here..

This is the end of sareum...and the ramping happy clappers are now looking very stupid...

How people spend their time is none of your concern...

Why not tell us a sareum potential story...

[peaceandlove] 27/3/2024 12:22

Bark, not sad at all. I'm trying to STOP others from losing their monies in a company that in my eyes is on the way out.

My advice is to log on to LSE and tell SOG, Potnak, Rebs, Carter to STOP ramping - that is wrong and sad. SOG for instance has ramped 120 times in the last 30 days. Pot kettle and all that.

What is your opinion on Sar Bark?

I've only stated facts.

[barkbooo] 27/3/2024 11:56

You guys really have no value/importance of your time - posts from 3/4 contributors on here that claim to have no financial interest, are now working 24-7.

Wow - that is sad.

[peaceandlove] 27/3/2024 11:22

Potnak over on LSE "I will buy some more today in anticipation of getting a forward looking statement with a clear plan to progress".

In the real world see below.

1)There're no licence or take over deals in the pipeline.

2)GSK handed 737 back - they didn't want it.

3)For reasons we don't know the MHRA did not give authorisation to Sareum to commence with clinical trials in the UK.

4)Sareum need money to complete/further advancement of clinical trials.

5)There is a massive dilution coming to the detriment of existing shareholders.

6) The science isn't proven as of yet.

7) 1802 can't move forward because their is no money.

8) Sareum could go bankrupt.

How can anyone be bullish about this company?

The facts above are correct. Potnak and co are in a different universe to me. If, imagine, what if.... it's complete fantasy. They're all making wild assumptions. I get it, when you invest in a stock for a long period of time you almost convince yourself you're right and will make a life changing amount of money. In reality it rarely happens. If it was that easy everyone would be soing it. This ends in tears IMHO - hopefully the board will update the market soon.

[wolfofwallstreets] 26/3/2024 23:13

Peaceandlove your posts are bang on..

Too many people have been sucked in by this...many people posting on LSE that they have suffered huge losses..

I hope just one person reads your posts and gets put off ever investing...

They have had 20 years and achieved nothing.

No amount of sharing science data from America changes that..

[peaceandlove] 26/3/2024 22:21

Good evening,

SOG like all the happy clappers still think the science wins whatever obstacles are in front of them.

What he and others can't comprehend is Sar is a small bio in Cambridge that gave it a go, and perhaps failed?

There aren't any large pharmaceutical's interested in Sar's products, period. I just don't see it. In addition the funding of clinical trials has found them out. It's too expensive! They probably knew this years ago and gambled on a license deal. Sar hoped to be taken out pre clinical because of the cost, most probably why it took so long to get to clinical trials. Also, the MHRA weren't interested. Why do you think that is?

You're right also Wolf, the board have done well out of this over the last 20 years. However, no Cashflow = no business with any small cap company.

It's a fact 90% of pharmaceutical start ups do not make it to market. In addition the cost to bring a new drug to market has an average cost of $1.4 billion hence why large pharmaceutical takes its time before parting with $billions. The few we hear about that make it are few and far between.

Look, I'm not trying to be harsh to Sareum has a company, but they gave it their best shot, and I feel it hasn't worked out.

The happy clappers I have less sympathy. There constant bullying over the years is absolutely disgusting! Anyone over the last 10 years that questioned the science was ridiculed into submission. Even over the last couple days the language of SOG, Rebs, Carter, Blob etc is wrong! Innocent posters sucked in by these ramping thugs! As Mr T used to say, you lose suckers! Looks like the wombles were right all along!

[criticalthinker1] 26/3/2024 22:04

But who moved their offices to Guernsey?
And what benefits does that entail.
Massive ball buster of shorting and playing the markets incoming.

[wolfofwallstreets] 26/3/2024 21:26

Check at sog Post on lse just there..

Even he seems like he's worked out this is over...and he's tye biggest ramper of all...

[criticalthinker1] 26/3/2024 21:01

So they're clinical or not..ps the LinkedIn research also involves peel hunt and rf.