Rtc Share Discussion Threads

[eburne1960] 06/11/2015 16:54

Yes, a bit of late buying.....

[mr hangman] 06/11/2015 16:45

New high by the looks of things

[glennborthwick] 30/10/2015 21:06

Heading to new high. At least a few months till results though.

[ricgains] 28/10/2015 18:37

RTC mentioned here on Share Radio. Starts 6m 30 in.

[11023154] 28/10/2015 17:12

A quality sign £23ks worth

[shanklin] 28/10/2015 16:14

Well that director buy certainly seems to have renewed the share price :-)

[shanklin] 28/10/2015 08:00

Starts...

"Hundreds of British troops will remain in Afghanistan alongside their US counterparts as security deteriorates and the Taliban regains ground, The Times understands."

[ir35] 22/10/2015 15:07

Unfortunately on Morningstar the 1 month and 3 month change shows as 0 so it doesn't look like a big upgrade

[shanklin] 22/10/2015 11:53

I can live with that :-)

[davidosh] 22/10/2015 11:22

All correct now... but just watch. Next we will have a few innocent investors thinking there has been a huge upgrade to the forecasts ! lol

[shanklin] 22/10/2015 07:54

IR35

REFS is now correct :-)

Cheers, Martin

[ir35] 21/10/2015 23:42

Shanklin

I don't subscribe to REFS but looking on their website they get their data from Morningstar. I have had a few problems with Morningstar over the last couple of years so had a talk with the Team leader for the Premium Service last week. From that discussion I believe they are making some big changes to improve their support - and I guess they are looking a bit more carefully at anything I report in the near future :)

[shanklin] 21/10/2015 14:33

IR35

That is good. REFS is still incorrect; I will check there again tomorrow.

Cheers, Martin

[ir35] 21/10/2015 14:01

Morningstar forecasts now restored to the previous values.

[11023154] 20/10/2015 13:44

Saw this this morn, appreciate the update from DD & shanklin.

[mr hangman] 20/10/2015 13:41

Thanks for that Shanks/David, has put my mind at rest, just to think i had my finger on the sell button, Lucky i did not press it

[shanklin] 20/10/2015 13:38

davidosh

Per your post 686, I definitely disagree with the statement that...

... "Neither the analyst nor I have any idea where the corrupt data shown on Company Refs has come from but it is certainly not related to WH Ireland the company broker even though it is claimed to be their forecast."

Given past form in this area, I am 99.9% certain this is related to WH Ireland, albeit it is something technical in terms of their data feeds rather than being related in any way to their analysts.

Cheers, Martin

[davidosh] 20/10/2015 13:25

I do not think Allenby will cover RTC any more as they are no longer the company broker since WHI appointed in March .

[penpont] 20/10/2015 13:25

Thanks a lot for that dd.

[penpont] 20/10/2015 13:08

Was an updated Allenby note issued after the interims in July? Latest I can find on their website is from March.

[davidosh] 20/10/2015 13:03

Just to put your minds at ease I have spoken to the analyst at WH Ireland and there has not been any change to forecasts at any point in the last three months so the comment by the company in the interim results is based on the following forecasts and expectation in the market from WH Ireland....

2015 pbt £1.5m and eps 7.7p
2016 pbt £1.7m and eps 8.7p

Neither the analyst nor I have any idea where the corrupt data shown on Company Refs has come from but it is certainly not related to WH Ireland the company broker even though it is claimed to be their forecast.

I have a notifiable holding here so take my interest and sources with whatever confidence you feel appropriate.

[shanklin] 20/10/2015 12:58

I now have a copy of the (latest!!) WH Ireland note from July 15 and the numbers are not as they have published to REFS etc.

So for 2015 and 2016, Adjusted EPS is shown as 7.7p and 8.7p, with Divis of 2.2p and 2.7 respectively.

AIUI there is no new note or planned new note.

HTH. Cheers, Martin

[shanklin] 20/10/2015 12:45

MrH, I agree with your post, but AIUI it does not reflect what has happened which is that WHI appear to have mucked up (again).